On Mi, 2006-09-13 at 15:23 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> When we do a "make crosstest" with mingw32msvc-gcc,
> the compiler give a warning about "-fPIC"
>
>
> Changelog:
> - configure.ac: Do not pass "-fPIC" to mingw for "make crosstest"
>
>
> Changes for configure are not included.
> I cr
Dimi Paun wrote:
>
> On Wed, September 13, 2006 1:18 pm, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> Offhand that looks like a more serious change than you thought.
>> You'd better either really understand the code, or
>> add a conformance test that shows this fixes a bug, IMHO.
>
> Agreed. But that is confusing code,
On Wed, September 13, 2006 1:18 pm, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Offhand that looks like a more serious change than you thought.
> You'd better either really understand the code, or
> add a conformance test that shows this fixes a bug, IMHO.
Agreed. But that is confusing code, it should have a /* fallthrou
On 9/13/06, Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 04:22, you wrote:
> Does adding the breaks fix conformance tests?
No, I haven't fixed anything with this patch: it was a neutral one, in that
respect. I just put it in because I perceived that those switch statem
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:57:13PM +0930, n0dalus wrote:
> Many people have their mail clients configured to filter emails
> into folders based on 'To:' fields, so it would be great if you
> could sort that out (your last few ones, such as this one,
> ended up in my inbox instead of my wine folder)
Hi,Slunt
Hmm as my thought you'd better read something about windows kernel
technology. If you got difficult in assembly , which I thought the very
low-level coding you refered to , to have a look at books about assembly maybe
the best choice. But I still think windows kernel technology
On 13/09/06, Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Changelog:
cabinet: Add breaks to switch statements.
diff -urN a/dlls/cabinet/fci.c b/dlls/cabinet/fci.c
--- a/dlls/cabinet/fci.c2006-09-12 11:55:48.0 +0100
+++ b/dlls/cabinet/fci.c2006-09-12 23:29:02.0 +01
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:57:13PM +0930, n0dalus wrote:
> On Wed Sep 13 10:57:33 2006 +0200, Marcus Meissner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Mention kernel 2.6.
> >
> >---
> >
> > documentation/README.de |2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >10857c3dbb8429ea599288ac
Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
Hi,
Your patch for RTL support in usp10.dll.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-September/030571.html
Only includes support for Arabic.
If you could include for other RTL languages esp Hebrew (other RTL
languages are Farsi and Urdu).
I think that would
On Wed Sep 13 10:57:33 2006 +0200, Marcus Meissner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mention kernel 2.6.
---
documentation/README.de |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
10857c3dbb8429ea599288ac93f4cecd8ffeff59
diff --git a/documentation/README.de b/documentation/README.de
ind
Hi Dmitry,
..thanks for looking into this!
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 12:10, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "David Gümbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure ;-) http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6191
>
> What's your screen resolution and WM? Are you using Wine from
> today's Git or any oth
Mikołaj Zalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When creating the wineprefix, create a directory for the menu and a
> configuration file that enables this menu in the freedesktop.org menu
> structure. As suggested on wine-devel the menu directory is a
> subdirectory of ~/.wine, so if the user delet
"David Gümbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure ;-) http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6191
What's your screen resolution and WM? Are you using Wine from
today's Git or any other version?
--
Dmitry.
"Matt Finnicum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The special cases handled by EM_EXSETSEL should also be handled by
> EM_SETSEL, so this patch moves that code into the common
> ME_SetSelection function. Before this patch, sending EM_SETSEL with
> any value less than -1 would crash richedit.
>
> Chang
Hi Dmitry,
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 10:38, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "David Gümbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In order to verify or falsify my guess, it would be extremely helpful
> > to find out which handle corresponds to the window showing the symtoms.
> > I've tried my luck with Pro
"David Gümbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In order to verify or falsify my guess, it would be extremely helpful to
find out which handle corresponds to the window showing the symtoms. I've
tried my luck with Process Explorer, but that tool doesn't show me the
information I need.
Could you uplo
Hi,
- I'm almost sure that question has been asked here before, but I can't seem
to find the corresponding post: I am trying to debug an application (Net
Support Manager) that has trouble displaying a window in fullscreen mode.
NSM enables you (among other things) to remotely look onto somebo
17 matches
Mail list logo
