Dan Kegel wrote:
No fair, Mike, you should have given the link to the PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19430
:) If you know a gcc person that has time, nagging them would be great.
Many similar errors will get caught, as long as you turn on the
optimizer with -O (otherwise the compiler can't detect
The problem is:
when in directx.c (Line 787, into the loop) try to Call function
HeapAlloc in the first iteration, it crash with the error invalid in-use
arena magic.
I found this errors:
stateLookup isn't allocated. It is a dword * [].
minLookup and maxLookup isn't initia
On 8/2/06, Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ["void *foo" is better than "void *foo = NULL", you want it
> to remain uninitialized because that way the compiler will warn]
gcc version 4.1.2 20060729 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-10)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wine$ cat foobar.c
void foo(int *);
Mike Hearn wrote:
And there are a few small style nits, for instance there's usually
no reason to change "void *foo" to "void *foo = NULL", you want it
to remain uninitialized because that way the compiler will warn if
it's ever used before being set to something: superior to blindly
using a NU
On 8/3/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The goal is to get rid of the service thread; the service thread was
just there as a placeholder. Once it's gone, signals are appropriate.
The realtime signal is just there as a placeholder until we figure out
how to squeze this down into SIGUSR1 a
Dan Hipschman wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to submit a patch which makes widl output forward declarations
to the header file for coclass definitions. Currently this is done only
if the coclass has its own forward declaration. For example,
[ uuid(...) ] coclass Foo;
[ uuid(...) ] coclass Bar { ...
On 8/2/06, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- The service thread seems like a good idea to me. But why use a signal
in this case, when there are simpler ways to achieve the same thing,
for instance with a named pipe?
- I'm not sure using the realtime signals will work. I don't remem
Dan Kegel wrote:
Piero Proietti wrote a nice demo app in VB6
which embeds a browser window. It doesn't
work in Wine. I think Jacek has been committing
patches that ought to help this
( e.g. http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-July/024993.html )
but it's not quite there yet.
Yes, it shoul
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:41:54 -0500, Thomas Kho wrote:
> This is an implementation of CreateRemoteThread and RtlCreateUserThread for
> remote processes that re-introduces a service thread for each process and uses
> a signal to flag pending operations. Operations are guarded by a global mutex
> for
I tried to hack on http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4848 and
dbghelp failed on me.
Log about the failure:
http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3151&action=view
Jan
Dan Hipschman wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to submit a patch which makes widl output forward declarations
to the header file for coclass definitions. Currently this is done only
if the coclass has its own forward declaration. For example,
[ uuid(...) ] coclass Foo;
[ uuid(...) ] coclass Bar { ..
Hi fellow Wine developers,
Our annual Wine conference is taking place in approximately 6 weeks
time. It is an opportunity for you to put names to faces and to talk
about projects that are too crazy to think about discussing on
wine-devel! It is also an opportunity to share knowledge and to share
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 13:52, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The actual problem is probably with the _execve symbol, because
> > FreeBSD doesn't have any of the spawn calls. So, how to solve this?
>
> The easiest is probably to rename ours to MSVCRT_
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:40:24PM -0300, Diego A. Degese wrote:
> 0009:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(0011,,0014) ret=7ec142bc
> 0009:err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x11: invalid in-use
> arena magic for 0x17c228
> Heap: 0x11
> Next: 0x3e3 Sub-heaps: 0x11
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 03:10 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> David D. Hagood wrote:
>
> > I've been posting my findings on this very matter to wine-users - look
> > for "cannot run under Fedora 6 tset 1".
>
> Alexandre has committed a patch that looks like it should fix the
> problem to the git t
On 8/2/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Piero Proietti wrote a nice demo app in VB6
which embeds a browser window. It doesn't
work in Wine. I think Jacek has been committing
patches that ought to help this
( e.g. http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-July/024993.html )
but it's not
Hi,
I noticed that winebrowser doesn't work with browsers/commands that
are more than one word. For example, the command to run konqueror
with the webbrowsing profile on kubuntu is:
kfmclient openProfile webbrowsing [url]
Setting that to be the first attempted webbrowser in the registry:
[HKE
On 8/2/06, H. Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02/08/06, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As for 3DMark 05 and 06, they don't seem to think we support Pixel Shader
2.0,
> > even when using GLSL, so I'm not sure how valuable those would be to
> > benchmark in that state.
I've come
Piero Proietti wrote a nice demo app in VB6
which embeds a browser window. It doesn't
work in Wine. I think Jacek has been committing
patches that ought to help this
( e.g. http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-July/024993.html )
but it's not quite there yet.
Piero's willing to tailor the te
Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The actual problem is probably with the _execve symbol, because FreeBSD
> doesn't have any of the spawn calls. So, how to solve this?
The easiest is probably to rename ours to MSVCRT_execve.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch adds a computer SID. A computer SID should be
> unique on a network but wine is a long way away from having
> network security working so this isn't a big issue. You can use
> a program like NewSID (http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/NewSid
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 01:21:57PM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
> My reasoning for reverting the change is that I'd rather have 5 more
> apps installing, than one app working (and it's Process Explorer of
> all things).
Indeed, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to kill all comment annotations
On 02/08/06, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for 3DMark 05 and 06, they don't seem to think we support Pixel Shader 2.0,
> even when using GLSL, so I'm not sure how valuable those would be to
> benchmark in that state.
I've come accross some sample programs that seem to use a refere
23 matches
Mail list logo
