I don't know if this was mentioned yet, but Alexandre had
an interview (in german) a couple weeks ago:
http://www.pc-magazin.de/common/nws/einemeldung.php?id=46304
The interesting bit for me:
Golem.de: Seit die erste Beta-Version von Wine im Oktober 2005
erschienen ist, gibt es nur 0.9.x-Veröffe
As I wrote earlier, I think it's worth polishing up Wine's support
for Lotus Notes even though IBM has a Java version of Notes.
And it seems that Stefan Seifert is actually trying to get
Wine working well in the next two weeks.
So I put together a wiki page to coordinate the effort, hope it's usef
Currently, using the Wine supplied print dialog, printing to a file
results in a file named "FILE:". In Windows (at least Win2k) a simple
one line dialog box is put up where the filename can be typed in. I
don't see a reason why a full Save As dialog would not be preferable;
some programs overr
Am Samstag, 15. Juli 2006 05:33 schrieb Mike McCormack:
> Christoph Frick wrote:
> > i build wine nearly every day from cvs. for the last to days i was not
> > able to do so as the first occurences of IID_IUnknown and
> > IID_IClassFactory the compiler thinks they are missing. i can also not
> > fi
On 7/16/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/16/06, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, kind of. Signals are only delivered when syscalls return, so
> > they won't work well if the thread you pick to molest happens to
> > not make any syscalls for a long time.
>
> Si
On 7/16/06, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, kind of. Signals are only delivered when syscalls return, so
> they won't work well if the thread you pick to molest happens to
> not make any syscalls for a long time.
Signals certainly don't need system calls to be delivered.
On 7/16/06, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cloning a new thread is not going to help with this at all, since it still uses
the
Win32 context of the original thread, so it only makes things worse.
What then is the solution? A service thread? I think it'd be OK to
have the hijacke
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, kind of. Signals are only delivered when syscalls return, so
> they won't work well if the thread you pick to molest happens to
> not make any syscalls for a long time.
Signals certainly don't need system calls to be delivered. IMO they
would be mo
It's not in CVS yet, but it's so close I can taste it:
with just a couple patches yet to be submitted,
my poster child Visual Basic app, ChurchWindows,
actually starts (see
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3628).
Wine is really starting to shape up!
On 7/16/06, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/16/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd rather not take the chance of doing anything that messes with the
> poor thread we're hijacking.Hmm... http://lwn.net/Articles/7577/ makes
> me think that converting a linux thread to a wi
On 7/16/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd rather not take the chance of doing anything that messes with the
poor thread we're hijacking.Hmm... http://lwn.net/Articles/7577/ makes
me think that converting a linux thread to a win32 thread might
require initializing the thread's TLS a
On 7/16/06, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I think calling CreateThread directly from the context of the
hijacked thread would be simpler, though I understand that gets hairy
as well if the hijacked thread is holding (say) the loader lock
I'd rather not take the chance of doing any
[forgot to hit "reply to all" instead of just reply ...]
On 7/15/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The right thing to do would be to promote the linux thread to
be a win32 thread, but as a temporary stopgap, Thomas
had the linux thread just do CreateThread and exit, hoping
that the newly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As of 2006-07-14, the CVS snapshot of Wine 0.9.17 broke MS Visual Basic
collections, when they ask for the _NewEnum in the _Collection interface.
This method is used for the For Each...Next language construct, when
applied
to collection interfaces implemented in external
Robert Reif wrote:
+static const WELLKNOWNSID WellKnownSids[] =
+{
+{ {' ',' '}, WinNullSid, SID_REVISION, 1, { SECURITY_NULL_SID_AUTHORITY },
{ SECURITY_NULL_RID } },
Two spaces isn't a very good way of making the entry not be parsed by
ParseStringSidToSid. Might I suggest using two
Am Sonntag 16 Juli 2006 10:35 schrieb Molle Bestefich:
> just in case anyone is interested...
>
> http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/07/12/geforce_and_radeon_take_on_linux/
Great, thanks for the link :-)
pgphsTgVc45aB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
just in case anyone is interested...
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/07/12/geforce_and_radeon_take_on_linux/
As of 2006-07-14, the CVS snapshot of Wine 0.9.17 broke MS Visual Basic
collections, when they ask for the _NewEnum in the _Collection interface.
This method is used for the For Each...Next language construct, when
applied
to collection interfaces implemented in external DLLs (that is, collections
18 matches
Mail list logo
