Re: wined3d: fix R8G8B8 texture upload

2006-05-27 Thread Ivan Gyurdiev
diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/utils.c b/dlls/wined3d/utils.c index 77b6b33..d15520b 100644 --- a/dlls/wined3d/utils.c +++ b/dlls/wined3d/utils.c @@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@ GLenum D3DFmt2GLFmt(IWineD3DDeviceImpl* /* color buffer */ case WINED3DFMT_R3G3B2: retVal = GL_RGB;

Re: void dispatch_rpc() returns a value

2006-05-27 Thread Robert Shearman
Bill Medland wrote: On May 27, 2006 03:51 pm, Robert Shearman wrote: Bang Jun-Young wrote: dispatch_rpc() shouldn't return anything since it's a void function, but it actually does. Thank you for reviewing the code. RpcRaiseException is also a void function. Rather than write

Re: void dispatch_rpc() returns a value

2006-05-27 Thread Bill Medland
On May 27, 2006 03:51 pm, Robert Shearman wrote: > Bang Jun-Young wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wonder how this has been possible so far: snip > >if (!params) return RpcRaiseException(E_OUTOFMEMORY); snip > > debugstr_guid(&ipid)); return RpcRaiseException(hr); snip > > > > dispatch_rpc() shouldn't

Re: comctl32_tests: Janitorial: write-strings warning fix

2006-05-27 Thread Andrew Talbot
Robert Shearman wrote: > > Absolutely. We should avoid regressions at all costs, but making literal > strings non-writable should help to uncover bugs. > Of course, what I am doing with the structure members is to say "These have been declared as writeable (LPSTR pszXYZ); I don't know whether th

Re: void dispatch_rpc() returns a value

2006-05-27 Thread Robert Shearman
Bang Jun-Young wrote: Hi, I wonder how this has been possible so far: static void __RPC_STUB dispatch_rpc(RPC_MESSAGE *msg) { struct dispatch_params *params; APARTMENT *apt; IPID ipid; HRESULT hr; RpcBindingInqObject(msg->Handle, &ipid); TRACE("ipid = %s, iMethod = %d\n", d

Re: Release Information on Fedora Extras!

2006-05-27 Thread Neal Gompa
I just noticed that the mailinglist thing sent thru all the older mail i sent before i reregistered! I didn't know it would show it after I registered! Sorry again!On 5/27/06, Neal Gompa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I noticed that my post on wine-devel seems to have revealed that I accidently added

Re: comctl32_tests: Janitorial: write-strings warning fix

2006-05-27 Thread Robert Shearman
Andrew Talbot wrote: Because I have had at least one patch like this accepted, I assumed what I was doing was OK. I guess another way of preventing this warning would be to use: x.pszText = (LPSTR) "string"; Assuming there is no danger in using this method, then it is neater for a single as

Release Information on Fedora Extras!

2006-05-27 Thread Neal Gompa
I have noticed that since my post about how Fedora packages are inaccessible, you have added the string "Currently official Fedora packages lag behind, but you can get Wine-0.9.10 by running yum install wine from Fedora Extras." Well, that is not totally correct. Usually about a week after Wine

Re: Release Information on Fedora Extras!

2006-05-27 Thread Neal Gompa
Ok, i just checked the release information for Wine-0.9.13, and it only took 3 days to release it. It is a good idea to assume anywhere from 3-5 days for Wine to be updated in Fedora Extras. On 5/27/06, Neal Gompa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have noticed that since my post about how Fedora package

Re: Release Information on Fedora Extras!

2006-05-27 Thread Neal Gompa
I should probably start thinking ahead ;)Ok, just for reference, I am adding in the repository information for x86_64Fedora Extras for Fedora Core 5: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/x86_64/repodata/repoview/W.group.html Fedora Extras for Fedora Core 4: http://download.f

Re: Release Information on Fedora Extras!

2006-05-27 Thread Neal Gompa
I noticed that my post on wine-devel seems to have revealed that I accidently added in the Fedora extras hyperlink to have i386 on one of the x86_64 links, sorry! Gmail interface isn't easy to work with... On 5/27/06, Neal Gompa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have noticed that since my post about how

Release Information on Fedora Extras!

2006-05-27 Thread Neal Gompa
I have noticed that since my post about how Fedora packages are inaccessible, you have added the string "Currently official Fedora packages lag behind, but you can get Wine-0.9.10 by running yum install wine from Fedora Extras." Well, that is not totally correct. Usually about a week after Wine P

Re: comctl32_tests: Janitorial: write-strings warning fix

2006-05-27 Thread Andrew Talbot
Hi Vitaliy, I am having a go at the janitorial project of fixing certain compiler warnings suggested at http://wiki.winehq.org/CompilerWarnings/. When the -Wwrite-strings flag is set, code like this: char *a = "string"; produces the message "warning: assignment discards qualifiers from poin

Re: comctl32_tests: Janitorial: write-strings warning fix

2006-05-27 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 11:57:33 AM, Andrew Talbot wrote: > Changelog: > comctl32_tests: Janitorial: write-strings warning fix. > diff -urN a/dlls/comctl32/tests/tab.c b/dlls/comctl32/tests/tab.c > --- a/dlls/comctl32/tests/tab.c 2006-05-27 17:25:57.0 +0100 > +++ b/dlls/comctl32/

Re: writing 0xdeadbeef directly is the worst case we did

2006-05-27 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When you reach "0xdeadbeaf" in a Bug/Crash, you can change the Value of > MAGIC_DEAD in the possible files and reach the bug. > (But this does not work anymore for "winspool.drv/tests/" after the > Tests from Dmitry.) This may be useful in some cas

void dispatch_rpc() returns a value

2006-05-27 Thread Bang Jun-Young
Hi, I wonder how this has been possible so far: static void __RPC_STUB dispatch_rpc(RPC_MESSAGE *msg) { struct dispatch_params *params; APARTMENT *apt; IPID ipid; HRESULT hr; RpcBindingInqObject(msg->Handle, &ipid); TRACE("ipid = %s, iMethod = %d\n", debugstr_guid(&ipid), msg

config.status: WARNING: Make.rules.in seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting

2006-05-27 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Starting last night, or the night before, I believe, my automated testers now issue the following warning on SUSE Linux 10.1/i386, and others: config.status: WARNING: Make.rules.in seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting Is this possibly related to the following? date: 2006-05-25 21

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
Dan Kegel wrote: On 5/26/06, Nick Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess I could create a symbolic link from the fonts directory in wine but where is the linux version of Picasa expecting to find these fonts Probably ~/.picasa/drive_c/windows/fonts, or something like that. The directory

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
Another quick note just saw the mistake I made with the URL, so here it is again ... This URL will display the pages in English but will not allow the download to take place ... so read about it here http://www.freeproxy.us/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL3BpY2FzYS5nb29nbGUuY29tL2xpbnV4L2luZGV4L

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
I guess I could create a symbolic link from the fonts directory in wine but where is the linux version of Picasa expecting to find these fonts ? Sorry I should be able to find them with find but I seem to have folders with fonts in several locations. Dan Kegel wrote: On 5/26/06, Nick Law <

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
I 've loaded and installed the .bin version, installation went flawlessly, I told it to index the whole hard drive it started doing that then after 30 seconds or do a message box poped up --- FATAL ERROR -- "Picasa cannot continue", it completely hung, the OK button was unresponsive and I had

Re: bug irony - bug in firefox or xorg

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
Works ok for me, no crashes. ( Firefox 1.5.0.3, Xorg version 6.8.2, ATI graphics card 9550 driver V8.23.07 ) Nick EA Durbin wrote: While browsing the bug database I discovered a bug, in which my x server crashes when i use the side horizontal scrollbar in firefox. I was browsing this attachme

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
Dan Kegel wrote: On 5/26/06, Nick Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Having looked at both the linux version and the windows version running on 0.9.14 I must admit that I prefer the windows version running on 0.9.14 simply because the fonts look much better on my system Could it be that you had

Re: bug irony - bug in firefox or xorg

2006-05-27 Thread paul
EA Durbin wrote: While browsing the bug database I discovered a bug, in which my x server crashes when i use the side horizontal scrollbar in firefox. I was browsing this attachment in firefox http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=2517&action=view Can anyone replicate this bug?, I'm not su

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Cihan Altinay
Detlef Riekenberg wrote: New! Picasa for Linux Google's photo organizer now available for Linux users. The Link-Target: http://picasa.google.com/linux/ results in: Google Error Not Found The requested URL /linux/ was not found on this server. According to this (s

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
And here's a working english link for those outside the US, I wonder why the normal links don't work for those outside the US ? http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/thanks-other.html It takes you straight to the .bin download with it's selfextracting installer. Nick Law wrote: Having

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
Having looked at both the linux version and the windows version running on 0.9.14 I must admit that I prefer the windows version running on 0.9.14 simply because the fonts look much better on my system ( if anybody is interested I can send a couple of screen shots), i.e the font look more like

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread David Goodenough
Dan Kegel wrote: > Google has indeed been working on Picasa, and it's finally available for > download at > http://labs.google.com/ I tried this, and the link to the linux version apparently does not exist! David > > For the curious, here are a few tidbits about how it came to be. > > When Go

Re: Picasa for Linux available!

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Law
I spoke to soon, they seems to be a couple of show stoppers on the windows on wine 0.9.14 and on the linux versions, i.e. hangs or not wanting to run at all. Can somebody let me know where I should report these problems to ? I assume this this not the correct place.. Nick Nick Law wrote: And

Re: DEVELOPER-HINTS: Some directories are renamed / removed / added

2006-05-27 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi Detlef, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > Changelog: > > DEVELOPER-HINTS: Some directories are renamed / removed / added > > > @@ -192,11 +194,15 @@ DLLs (under dlls/): > Winelib programs (under programs/): > --- > > - avitools/ - AVI informati

writing 0xdeadbeef directly is the worst case we did

2006-05-27 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
Am Samstag, den 27.05.2006, 01:01 +0200 schrieb Andreas Mohr: > > I was using 0x00dead00 before, but Dmitry suggested 0xdeadbeef, as this > > is used in most Places in wine. > > First, then you should really write it as such... > Second, why does it *ALWAYS* have to be 0xdeadbeef? It was 0x00de

Re: rpcrt4: Implement NdrClientContext(Un)Marshall.

2006-05-27 Thread Saveliy Tretiakov
Mike McCormack wrote: Due to the methods and attitudes of some ReactOS developers, we believe that it would be better to avoid including ReactOS code in Wine. My methods are absolutely clean. I used testcode to uncover undocumented functions behaviour. Thats how all wine developers do things.