Pegasus Mail via Wine

2006-04-03 Thread James E. Lang
I have been using Pegasus Mail via Wine for nearly two years. Before that I used Pegasus Mail on a Win98 system for several years. Since Wine officially entered Beta category in late 2005, I have tried most of the releases (starting with 0.9.3). Pegasus functioned quite well with Wine Versions

Re: wine / fontforge regression

2006-04-03 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Tony Lambregts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This seems like a hard dependancy to me if a user can't run winecfg without it. That's not true. -- Dmitry.

Re: [opengl] Another possible fix for the BadMatch error

2006-04-03 Thread Tomas Carnecky
Willie Sippel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 2. April 2006 16:44 schrieb Leon Freitag: >> Someone mentioned earlier that the code in wgl.c in DescribeDrawable() >> violates the GLX specification and therefore causes bogus return values for >> the visualid. However this code has been already present before th

Re: winebuild: Add an "x86_64" flag

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alexandre Julliard wrote: >>Are there really enough functions that would need this to justify >>adding a new flag? >> > > Get/SetWindowLongPtr in user32, RtlUnwindEx in ntdll, NdrClientCall3 > in rpcrt4. These are the ones I have noticed so far. These

Re: AppDB email address obfuscation

2006-04-03 Thread Jeremy Newman
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 00:29 +1030, n0dalus wrote: > I am concerned that the email addresses on the appdb are too easily > harvestable. Is there a reason no effort seems to be made to hide the > email addresses of users on there? Probably the best thing to do is to set it up so the email addresses

Re: winebuild: Add an "x86_64" flag

2006-04-03 Thread Robert Shearman
Alexandre Julliard wrote: Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ChangeLog: Add an "x86_64" flag in winebuild so we can export 64-bit-only functions in a 64-bit build. Are there really enough functions that would need this to justify adding a new flag? Get/SetWindowLongPtr in

Re: wine / fontforge regression

2006-04-03 Thread Tony Lambregts
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: "Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's plenty of people who think they're qualified to compile from source (*cough* Gentoo *cough*), and don't realize that anything from missing dependencies to different compiler flags can cause trouble. If they like spe

Re: winebuild: Add an "x86_64" flag

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ChangeLog: > Add an "x86_64" flag in winebuild so we can export 64-bit-only > functions in a 64-bit build. Are there really enough functions that would need this to justify adding a new flag? -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AppDB email address obfuscation

2006-04-03 Thread Karl Lattimer
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 00:29 +1030, n0dalus wrote: > Hi, > > I am concerned that the email addresses on the appdb are too easily > harvestable. Is there a reason no effort seems to be made to hide the > email addresses of users on there? > Yeah it would be nice if my email address was hidden, I g

Re: [opengl] Another possible fix for the BadMatch error

2006-04-03 Thread Willie Sippel
Am Sonntag, 2. April 2006 16:44 schrieb Leon Freitag: > Someone mentioned earlier that the code in wgl.c in DescribeDrawable() > violates the GLX specification and therefore causes bogus return values for > the visualid. However this code has been already present before the > regression, but worked

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-03 Thread Mike Hearn
I might be wrong, but isn't a suid root winewrapper much more dangerous compared to the realtime-lsm solution? All realtime-lsm does is allowing mlock and realtime privileges for a given user or group, while a suid root wineserver would also have access to root-only files and device nodes, no?

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-03 Thread Willie Sippel
Am Sonntag, 2. April 2006 15:23 schrieb Mike Hearn: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 03:49:39 +0200, Willie Sippel wrote: > > Just tested Mike's patch with realtime-lsm. Running Wine as regular user > > now gives perfect audio with no stutter for every application I tried so > > far. So yes, realtime-lsm actu

Re: linux 2.6.16 and 2G/2G-split

2006-04-03 Thread Sven Köhler
>> since i upgraded my kernel to 2.6.16, wine segfaults immediatly after i >> start it. When i upgraded to 2.6.16, i also chose to use the 2G/2G vmsplit. >> >> Is wine supposed to work with that config? > > No, it won't work (and other apps will break too). Don't mess with > vmsplit. That message

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-03 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, [sneaked in another CC, JFYI ;] On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:29:43PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > And even then, SCHED_ISO is a long way off and may never be merged. > Waiting for it wouldn't be helping users today, which is a bad thing IMHO. I don't think SCHED_ISO is necessarily a long way of

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-03 Thread Mike Hearn
More on topic, does this simply change Wine's priority or does it act on a per-thread level? Most of the issues I've seen have been caused by the audio thread being starved by the others, and is often semi-solved by running Wine at nice 19 The latter. I did try renicing Wine first, but no joy.

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-03 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:04:05PM +0100, Aneurin Price wrote: > Anyway, surely the `best' way would be for the kernel to support > user-level `real-time' priorities like the ck kernels. Anybody know why > they don't like the idea of that kind of thing? Con Kolivas is doing some very active

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-03 Thread Aneurin Price
Mike Hearn wrote: I'm not convinced this is true. At least some (maybe most or all) of the games showing this problem work just fine if true OSS (ie. not ALSA-emulated OSS) is used as the sound driver. WoW and StarCraft spring to mind immediately. Plus apparently they work in Cedega without ne

Re: [Bug 4979] New: wine .9.11 make fails on AMD64

2006-04-03 Thread Tomas Carnecky
Robert Shearman wrote: > > You might want to find out why you have to add anything to LDFLAGS. I > don't know about other distributions, but on 64-bit Ubuntu passing the > -m32 flag to gcc will make it automatically add the standard 32-bit lib > directories to the lib path (i.e. /lib32, /usr/lib32

Re: You don't have administrator privileges on this computer ... (whats changed in 0.9.11?)

2006-04-03 Thread Vitaly Lipatov
В сообщении от 2 апреля 2006 11:40 Roland Kaser написал(a): > Hello > > I just tried to make my usual test installations on the new 0.9.11 release. > But at this time the setup responses (in german) Sie haben keine Please check system.reg -- Vitaly Lipatov, ALT Linux Team Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: What's uuid 33ad4ed2-6699-11cf-b70c-00aa0060d393?

2006-04-03 Thread Robert Shearman
Dan Kegel wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=33ad4ed2 turns up seven apps which fail with errors like fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_FindConnectionPoint no connection point for {33ad4ed2-6699-11cf-b70c-00aa0060d393} http://www.google.com/search?q=33ad4ed2-669

Re: [Bug 4979] New: wine .9.11 make fails on AMD64

2006-04-03 Thread Robert Shearman
Tomas Carnecky wrote: Robert Shearman wrote: This is a bug with the artsc-config utility, not with Wine. All of these types of utilities are fundamentally broken on 64-bit distributions when trying to compile as 32-bit. And what about fixing first wine instead of complaining about th

AppDB email address obfuscation

2006-04-03 Thread n0dalus
Hi, I am concerned that the email addresses on the appdb are too easily harvestable. Is there a reason no effort seems to be made to hide the email addresses of users on there? Also, when getting a notification of a post, you can see everyone's email addresses in the To: field. Should these be Bc

Re: [Bug 4979] New: wine .9.11 make fails on AMD64

2006-04-03 Thread Tomas Carnecky
Robert Shearman wrote: > This is a bug with the artsc-config utility, not with Wine. All of these > types of utilities are fundamentally broken on 64-bit distributions when > trying to compile as 32-bit. > And what about fixing first wine instead of complaining about third party utilities? $ ./

Re: [Bug 4979] New: wine .9.11 make fails on AMD64

2006-04-03 Thread Robert Shearman
Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin Navea) wrote: Wine Bugs wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4979 Summary: wine .9.11 make fails on AMD64 Product: Wine Version: 0.9.11. Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCON

Re: [Bug 4979] New: wine .9.11 make fails on AMD64

2006-04-03 Thread Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin Navea)
Wine Bugs wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4979 Summary: wine .9.11 make fails on AMD64 Product: Wine Version: 0.9.11. Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

Re: linux 2.6.16 and 2G/2G-split

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Sven Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i didn't get any response on the user-mailinglist, so i try the > devel-list. here's my problem: > > since i upgraded my kernel to 2.6.16, wine segfaults immediatly after i > start it. When i upgraded to 2.6.16, i also chose to use the 2G/2G vmsplit. > > I

Re: winhelp esperanto language update

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Julliard
f_sophia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, Folks > > Change Log. > autor: Antonio Codazzi > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Content: > /programs/winhelp/Eo.rc (Esperanto language) update n. 2. > - Added "short-cuts" support > > --- Eo.old2006-03-26 01:56:27.0 +0100 > +++ Eo.rc 2006-03-

Re: wine / fontforge regression

2006-04-03 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's plenty of people who think they're qualified to compile from source (*cough* Gentoo *cough*), and don't realize that anything from missing dependencies to different compiler flags can cause trouble. If they like spend their time looking at t

Re: wine / fontforge regression

2006-04-03 Thread Mike McCormack
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: It's OK that most people don't have fontforge installed, that just means that people who can't cope with compiling from source and can't satisfy all the required dependencies to create a working binary shouldn't do it. They need to use a prepackaged one from a confidenti

Re: wine / fontforge regression

2006-04-03 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem is that it's not immediately obvious that FontForge is required, and most people don't have it installed. How about we use one of the following solutions: * put a warning about this in configure * add the prebuild .ttf files to the sour

Re: wine / fontforge regression

2006-04-03 Thread Vitaly Lipatov
В сообщении от 3 апреля 2006 09:31 Mike McCormack написал(a): ... > * add the prebuild .ttf files to the source package and fall back to > those if we don't have fontforge (not many people modify the .sfd files) I think it is optimal solution. We can just pack .ttf files, it will not rebuild with f

PATCH: msvcrt: test: Allow environment strings longer than 512 characters

2006-04-03 Thread qingdoa daoo
Test case added New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates. attach_test.diff Description: 878948009-attach_test.diff