Dan Kegel wrote:
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=33ad4ed2
turns up seven apps which fail with errors like
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_FindConnectionPoint no connection point for
{33ad4ed2-6699-11cf-b70c-00aa0060d393}
http://www.google.com/search?q=33ad4ed2-6699
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Missing fontforge means that you don't have Wine builtin fonts which
leads to the above problems. The solution obviously is to install
fontforge or use a binary Wine package instead.
The problem is that it's not immediately obvious that FontForge is
required, and most
While looking for COM documentation for C programmers (i.e. for
when you want to do COM without helpers like MFC or ATL), I stumbled
across quite a bit for assembly programmers!
For the record, here are some of the interesting links on both subjects I
ran across tonight:
http://ript.net/~spec/ -
On Monday 03 April 2006 11:46, Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:58:26AM +1000, Troy Rollo wrote:
> Is there a case possible where neither can be constructed without
> hassle? Think something like: insurance against GPL violators.
The insurance company has to be able to demonstrat
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=33ad4ed2
turns up seven apps which fail with errors like
fixme:ole:OLEPictureImpl_FindConnectionPoint no connection point for
{33ad4ed2-6699-11cf-b70c-00aa0060d393}
http://www.google.com/search?q=33ad4ed2-6699-11cf-b70c-00aa0060
"Molle Bestefich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch from Mar 9:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-March/021502.html
causes all applications run with Wine to continually emit:
err:font:ReadFontDir Can't open directory
"/usr/local/bin/../lib/../share/wine/fonts/"
when fontfo
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:58:26AM +1000, Troy Rollo wrote:
> On Saturday 01 April 2006 18:43, Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> > To enforce the licence one doesn't need any copyright (asignment)
> > at the work at all. You just need to be appointed by (one of) the
> > copyright holder(s) to enforce it.
>
>
Molle Bestefich wrote:
> This patch from Mar 9:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-March/021502.html
> causes all applications run with Wine to continually emit:
> err:font:ReadFontDir Can't open directory
> "/usr/local/bin/../lib/../share/wine/fonts/"
> when fontforge isn't install
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 09:58 +1000, Troy Rollo wrote:
> This is correct - the only reason you would need to own the whole of
> the copyright is if you wanted to re-license in circumstances or under
> terms not within the existing licence.
Even more reason to assign only partly the copyright. That i
On Saturday 01 April 2006 18:43, Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> To enforce the licence one doesn't need any copyright (asignment)
> at the work at all. You just need to be appointed by (one of) the
> copyright holder(s) to enforce it.
This is not generally the case. If you don't own the copyright, you can
Gmail also:To: wine-develjust does any domain.On 4/2/06, n0dalus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On 4/3/06, Joao Inacio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> I use GMail, and i can filter by subject or by "to:" header... but not "cc:"...>> some emails get filtered, and some don't so i need to keep sorting them.>
On 4/3/06, Joao Inacio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use GMail, and i can filter by subject or by "to:" header... but not
> "cc:"...
>
> some emails get filtered, and some don't so i need to keep sorting them.
>
In my gmail I am only filtering by to. I think to works for cc as
well. The problem
> ChangeLog:
> d3dx: VertexBuffer should keep reference to the parent device object.
That's probably the best solution for the moment.
>+/* Parent reference */
>+LPDIRECT3DDEVICE9 parentDevice;
However, the name parentDevice is somewhat misleading, in particular
considering the meani
You're missing the point.
It can screw things up on multi-user servers where uptime is important
and you don't want just anybody to hang the box. I don't think it's a
big deal on a desktop where the absolute worst case is you have to hit
the reset button.
What we need is a mechanism that
i
On 4/2/06, Joao Inacio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use GMail, and i can filter by subject or by "to:" header... but not
> "cc:"...
>
In the To: line for the filter put "*) AND cc:(wine-devel@winehq.org"
to create a cc: filter.
--
Travis Watkins
http://www.realistanew.com
Hello,
This patch from Mar 9:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2006-March/021502.html
causes all applications run with Wine to continually emit:
err:font:ReadFontDir Can't open directory
"/usr/local/bin/../lib/../share/wine/fonts/"
when fontforge isn't installed.
Also, take a look
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:57:28PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm not sure it counts as easy. At least Fedora and SUSE already have an
LSM module loaded, for SELinux and AppArmor respectively. Some s
I use GMail, and i can filter by subject or by "to:" header... but not "cc:"...
some emails get filtered, and some don't so i need to keep sorting them.
just my 2 euro-cents
--
João Inácio
http://www.jcinacio.com
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 13:30 -0700, Duane Clark wrote:
> Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 15:18 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:07AM +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > ...
> >>> And finally, why does it take half a day for a post I've made to ping
> >>> ba
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:57:28PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm not sure it counts as easy. At least Fedora and SUSE already have an
> > LSM module loaded, for SELinux and AppArmor respectively. Some solution
> > based on making wineserver sui
I just updated the wine-wiki at "Building from GIT" to link to the new
version of my script.
see here: http://wiki.jswindle.com/index.php/Installing_Wine#Building_from_GIT
bye
On 4/1/06, Christian Lachner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more Version! It's time to test this script until it is on
Karl Lattimer wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 15:18 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:07AM +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
...
And finally, why does it take half a day for a post I've made to ping
back to my email inbox?
It likely was in the moderation queue for some reason
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 15:18 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:07AM +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having real issue with this list, I can't distinguish betweeen list
> > mail, other email and spam. Why is there no prefix [wine-devel] in the
> > subjec
Someone mentioned earlier that the code in wgl.c in DescribeDrawable()
violates the GLX specification and therefore causes bogus return values for
the visualid. However this code has been already present before the
regression, but worked somehow. So the regression can't be caused by this
violat
Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:07AM +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
Hi,
I am having real issue with this list, I can't distinguish betweeen list
mail, other email and spam. Why is there no prefix [wine-devel] in the
subject line?
The List-Id: header i
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm not sure it counts as easy. At least Fedora and SUSE already have an
LSM module loaded, for SELinux and AppArmor respectively. Some solution
based on making wineserver suid root might work but I didn't get anywhe
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure it counts as easy. At least Fedora and SUSE already have an
> LSM module loaded, for SELinux and AppArmor respectively. Some solution
> based on making wineserver suid root might work but I didn't get anywhere
> when I played with that.
You're
Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin Navea) wrote:
Segin wrote:
I never see ANY of the posts I make once I make them. Could be a
setting of my email client to not fetch email I sent myself, but
seems unlikey cause GMail's web interface never claims to have
anything from myself.
I think GMail
Kai Blin wrote:
* "Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin Navea)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/04/06,
09:36:53]:
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Also I don't particularly like the reply-to setup here, can't it just be
munged back to the list, rather than replying to an individual?
Everyone else is fin
Segin wrote:
I never see ANY of the posts I make once I make them. Could be a
setting of my email client to not fetch email I sent myself, but seems
unlikey cause GMail's web interface never claims to have anything from
myself.
I think GMail drops mails sent by your own account (does the same
* "Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin Navea)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/04/06,
09:36:53]:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >Also I don't particularly like the reply-to setup here, can't it just be
> >munged back to the list, rather than replying to an individual?
> >
> >
> >Everyone else is fine by it.
>
On 3/31/06, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone else have any objections or other thoughts on it?My $.02 is that it's necessary. Last year I had a chance for someone local to make a donation but they needed to do it to a registered 501c3 organization. Well, the money ended up going to
MF wrote:
configure:1862: gcc -m32 -V &5
gcc: '-V' must come at the start of the command line
configure:1865: $? = 1
configure:1888: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:1891: gcc -m32conftest.c >&5
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.
n0dalus wrote:
On 4/2/06, Karl Lattimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am having real issue with this list, I can't distinguish betweeen list
mail, other email and spam. Why is there no prefix [wine-devel] in the
subject line?
Use a mail client that can filter by To:
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Also I don't particularly like the reply-to setup here, can't it just be
munged back to the list, rather than replying to an individual?
Everyone else is fine by it.
Actually I'd prefer it to only reply to the list as well.
MF wrote:
Hi,
System: Dell Power Edge 830, Intel Dual Core, Linux Ubuntu 5.10, 64 bits
version
Tried to compile Wine with the ./tools/wineinstall as per recommended
procedure in readme file, from sources package downloaded with apt-get
build-dep wine and apt-get --build source wine wich did not
On 4/2/06, Karl Lattimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having real issue with this list, I can't distinguish betweeen list
> mail, other email and spam. Why is there no prefix [wine-devel] in the
> subject line?
Use a mail client that can filter by To: fields.
> Also I don't particula
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 03:49:39 +0200, Willie Sippel wrote:
> Just tested Mike's patch with realtime-lsm. Running Wine as regular user now
> gives perfect audio with no stutter for every application I tried so far. So
> yes, realtime-lsm actually does the trick - me happy! ;)
Wonderful!
> I load
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:47:07AM +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having real issue with this list, I can't distinguish betweeen list
> mail, other email and spam. Why is there no prefix [wine-devel] in the
> subject line?
The List-Id: header is the canonical way to do.
> Also I don
Hi,
System: Dell Power Edge 830, Intel Dual Core, Linux Ubuntu 5.10, 64 bits
version
Tried to compile Wine with the ./tools/wineinstall as per recommended
procedure in readme file, from sources package downloaded with apt-get
build-dep wine and apt-get --build source wine wich did not go 100%
wel
Hi,
i didn't get any response on the user-mailinglist, so i try the
devel-list. here's my problem:
since i upgraded my kernel to 2.6.16, wine segfaults immediatly after i
start it. When i upgraded to 2.6.16, i also chose to use the 2G/2G vmsplit.
Is wine supposed to work with that config?
Than
Hi,
I am having real issue with this list, I can't distinguish betweeen list
mail, other email and spam. Why is there no prefix [wine-devel] in the
subject line?
Also I don't particularly like the reply-to setup here, can't it just be
munged back to the list, rather than replying to an individua
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:40:03AM +0200, Roland Kaser wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just tried to make my usual test installations on the new 0.9.11 release.
> But at this time the setup responses (in german) Sie haben keine
> Verwaltungsprivilegien auf diesem Computer. Setup kann nicht fortgesetzt
>
Jeff L wrote:
This patch came about when I was looking at why single stepping seemed
to stuff up after a call. It breaks down the calls for 32 bit mode
calls but not necessarily 16 and not 64 bit calls. It is a fairly messy
area of knowledge and I could do with assistance as to how the 16/32/
44 matches
Mail list logo
