Hi!
I would like to report a regression made by commits issued 2006/03/23 at the
evening. Just now I don't have bisecting environment available, I've just made
a simple CVS regression testing and found the above commit (it modifies
multiple areas) guilty.
The problem is that DC++ gui is totally
Eric Pouech wrote:
> Grant Lewis wrote:
>> It's repeatable. I can launch the progam fine but when I click in certain
>> parts of the gui I generate the page fault and the program dies.
>>
>> wine: Unhandled page fault on write access to 0x001f at address
>> 0x7d62d6 (th
>> read 0009), startin
Hi
This patch breaks firefox-1.5 on fedora core 4 (x86-64).
err:ole:CoGetClassObject class {4955dd33-b159-11d0-8fcf-00aa006bcc59}
not registered
err:ole:CoGetClassObject no class object
{4955dd33-b159-11d0-8fcf-00aa006bcc59} could be created for for context 0x1
fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no cla
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any word on why this patch wasn't applied? There's a test marked todo_wine
> by Stefan Leichter that demonstrates this behaviour. And here's the relevant
> part of a relay log:
QueryDosDevice needs to be fixed to return real device names instead
of jus
Any word on why this patch wasn't applied? There's a test marked todo_wine
by Stefan Leichter that demonstrates this behaviour. And here's the relevant
part of a relay log:
0009:Call kernel32.QueryDosDeviceA(7fb0fe68 "a:",7fb0f8c8,0400)
ret=0100503a
0009:Ret kernel32.QueryDosDeviceA() ret
Deprived of patch-writing time lately I can do little more than cheer the
team on. And of course, take pot-shots at our partners over the wall,
the Windows team themselves ;) Hello there if you're reading this!
In the comments of this anonymous MS employees blogs post (great reporting
here huh) we
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 14:02 -0500, Segin wrote:
> Also note that most of Winetools prior usefullness was killed when we
> killed ~/.wine/config
Now we rely on winereg? is that correct (I should know this ;)
I've been making some steady progress today, managed to get CD auto
detection working (fr
Hi,
In short it wont work. In long see inline.
On 3/24/06, Segin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would Wine load the .dll.so's? Since Interix uses PE for it's native
> format (running on Windows, duh), Would Wine load the .dll.so's? Would
> it reject them being in PE format and having the 'POSIX Lay
