Just FYI here are some tests I made in November:
http://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-November/006273.html
Casper
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steven Edwards
Sent: 13. januar 2006 17:01
To: Rolf Kalbermatter
Cc: wine-dev
On 1/12/06, CS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the FAQ you write under "2.12. When will Wine be finished?":
>
> "Right now we are working on releasing Wine 0.9 our schedule has this
> release around September 30th 2005."
I'll update it tomorrow, thanks!
Tom
Hi,
Dan Kegel wrote:
In June '05, Tobias Burnus complained in
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2005/06/0536.html
that there seemed to be an 8kB size limit on rich text output from richedit...
but nobody replied to his message.
It was soon fixed. (I vaguely remember that the problem
In June '05, Tobias Burnus complained in
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2005/06/0536.html
that there seemed to be an 8kB size limit on rich text output from richedit...
but nobody replied to his message.
Tobias, did you ever resolve that problem?
- Dan
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http:/
I mentioned that the setup program of AstroWorld will not work any longer
since a few days. Regression testing resulted in the change of
ntdll/virtual.c between 3.1.06 and 4.1.06. I didn't find any related entry
in wine.patches, so here is the diff result:
37a38
> #include
837a839
> struct sta
In the FAQ you write under "2.12. When will Wine be finished?":
"Right now we are working on releasing Wine 0.9 our schedule has this
release around September 30th 2005."
maybe that should be updated or removed altogether so there don't need
to be updates to this entry in the future.
sorry
Hi,
On 1/13/06, Rolf Kalbermatter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This solution has been starting to form in my mind as well. It is even
> portable to MSVC it seems with a few small modifications to winapi/msvcmaker.
I came up with a much more generic solution that will work on all
compilers and doe
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:51:36PM +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> Changelog:
>
> - winspool: updated some traces for bug 4268
>
>
> --
> By By ...
> ... Detlef
> diff --git a/dlls/winspool/info.c b/dlls/winspool/info.c
> index 9b1771d..a4caa39 100644
> --- a/dlls/winspool/info.c
> +++
Michael Kaufmann wrote:
Changelog:
- Detect if the image of the current process has a manifest. If yes,
enable some Windows XP-specific features (as described in MSDN)
- Destruction of the control window: Destroy bitmaps loaded at control
creation time (removed a resource leak)
- Always st
Hi Uwe,
I and maybe David planned to help you with the Wine booth. One of us will be
there, probably for all 4 days.
cu,
Stefan
Am Freitag, 13. Januar 2006 13:25 schrieb Uwe Bonnes:
> Hallo,
>
> has anybody interest in activly participating in a Wine booth in Linuxtag
> 2006 (http://www.linux
On 1/13/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm aware of that. We just have different approaches. Mine is from
> higher level functions to lower level, yours the other way round. Our
> approaches are not exclusive, we can simply meet in the middle (I know i
> took the easier way :-)).
Hallo,
has anybody interest in activly participating in a Wine booth in Linuxtag
2006 (http://www.linuxtag.org/2006/de/home/cfpro.html) in Wiesbaden from May
3 to May 6? Please let me know. Projects should have applied before
Feb. 3. 2006.
If needed, I can provide a place to sleep here in my fla
James, I just saw your advpack patches.
Only patch 4 (* Add stubs for the file save/restore functions),
Makefile.in gets a merge conflict with mine first 1 (Move inf install
functions to install.c ). The rest applies fine (some offset warnings),
and builds without warning. Should I rediff again
James Hawkins wrote:
On 1/12/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ChangeLog:
Implement LaunchINFSection on top of DoInfInstall
I'm afraid this implementation isn't correct. DoInfInstall calls
SetupInstallFromInfSection which only concerns the Install section of
an INF file.
> Hmm, perhaps use a CFLAGS "-include autogenerated.h" trick.
>
> Generate "autogenerated.h" by collecting all possible includes via
> a script on "make depend", then force it into every file with
> -include autogenerated.h (previously compiled to pch).
>
> Has the advantage that the magic is al
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:47:43AM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:02:42PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> > > Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> > >
> > > > We've been using PCH with GCC for a long time in ReactOS,
> > it's been
> > > > working very well and relia
* On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Kai Blin wrote:
> being a fairly new contributor to the wine project myself, I can point
> at the following web pages to get involved:
>
> http://www.winehq.org/site/fun_projects
* On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Glad to meet you :-)
> I have a page that might help
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:02:42PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> > Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> >
> > > We've been using PCH with GCC for a long time in ReactOS,
> it's been
> > > working very well and reliable. Compiling ReactOS is *a lot*
> > > faster with
> > > PCH enabled.
> >
> >
On 1/12/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> Implement RunSetupCommand on top of DoInfInstall.
>
The same comments for LaunchINFSection apply here as well. If these
three APIs just call DoInfInstall, then what's the point in having
them? We need to implement these correctl
On 1/12/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> Implement LaunchINFSection on top of DoInfInstall
>
I'm afraid this implementation isn't correct. DoInfInstall calls
SetupInstallFromInfSection which only concerns the Install section of
an INF file. SetupInstallFromInfSection a
On 1/12/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> Implement LaunchINFSectionEx on top of DoInfInstall.
>
The same comments for LaunchINFSectionEx apply here as well.
LaunchINFSectionEx also needs the backup and restore capabilities that
DoInfInstall can't provide.
--
James Hawk
Aaron Conole wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what's going on with my system, as I'm looking
Wine 20040813
This version of Wine is over a year old. Testing with the current CVS
version of Wine would be much more useful.
=>2 0x401dce63 .L133+0x23 in ntdll (0x401fecf8)
3 0x401dbc17 usr
22 matches
Mail list logo
