Re: Are Visual Basic install problems common?

On 10/21/05, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just sent the 2 patches to wine-patches. Those patches aren't work in > progress as the real fixes would be to rewrite the functions VarDiv() > and VarCmp() based on extensive tests (Basicaly permutating through all > possible combination

Re: Are Visual Basic install problems common?

Dan Kegel wrote: On 10/20/05, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan Kegel wrote: The installers of the most VB applications i have played with installed fine. One failed though due to bugs in VarCmp() and i think it was VarDiv(). I have quick fixes for those bugs in my tree but ha

Mystery solved: acoc breaks Wine's configure!

Here's the strangest thing I've seen for a while. I was tracking down why I could build Wine, but another guy on the same machine could only build a slightly broken Wine that gave the error Wine cannot find the FreeType font library. To enable Wine to use TrueType fonts please install a versio

Re: Final call for bug fixes

From: "Vincent Béron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I won't be home this week-end, so it'll go to Monday night at the > earliest. Release will be Tue night anyway, so we should be good. -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.

Re: Final call for bug fixes

Le ven 21/10/2005 à 10:05, Dimi Paun a écrit : > From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to > > release on Tuesday. > > Speaking of which, what's the status for our FC builds? > We really need binary builds for Fedora for

version: updated trace for VERSIONED_PRINTER (v3)

Changelog: > - updated trace to support VERSIONED_PRINTER > This time without deleting the TRACE for the flags. Informations on the Web: "Specifying Printer Driver Version Numbers" > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/graphics/hh/graphics/prtinst_17e31a0a-7873-4141-bc53-69021b034003.

Re: Final call for bug fixes

On Friday 21 October 2005 23:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Folks, > > I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to > release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed > for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time > to speak up...

Re: Final call for bug fixes

Alexandre Julliard schrieb: > Folks, > > I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to > release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed > for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time > to speak up... > Yep! Remember the mem

Re: ActiveX controls in MSHTML?

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "wine-devel@winehq.org" > Betreff: ActiveX controls in MSHTML? > Datum: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:45:10 -0700 > > A systems integrator mentioned that many commercial ERP applications > use ActiveX terminal emulator controls em

Re: ActiveX controls in MSHTML?

Dan Kegel wrote: A systems integrator mentioned that many commercial ERP applications use ActiveX terminal emulator controls embedded in web pages. (I think http://www.zephyrcorp.com/terminal-emulator-activex-document.htm is an example of such an ActiveX control.) Presumably these will run in IE

Re: wine / Linux kernel interaction

Am Freitag, den 21.10.2005, 10:47 +1000 schrieb Troy Rollo: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:15, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > Because the scanner, like too many others, is > > unsupported by SANE. > > Which scanner? > Lexmark x5130 http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/lexmark-x5130.html -- By

Re: docs

Le jeudi 20 octobre 2005 à 00:28 +0200, Jonathan Ernst a écrit : > Le mardi 18 octobre 2005 à 09:55 -0600, Brian Vincent a écrit : > > On 10/14/05, Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > > One thing that would be nice to have is a complete list of registry > > keys and values. Bon

Re: Re[4]: Linking wine *dll.so libraries with Linux applications ?!

On 10/21/05, Alexander Efremov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you could provide me with avifil32.dll functionalities for Linux I > would really appreciate it. This library allows you to have different > types of streams (not only video or audio) inside an *.avi file. And > this is exectly what I n

ActiveX controls in MSHTML?

A systems integrator mentioned that many commercial ERP applications use ActiveX terminal emulator controls embedded in web pages. (I think http://www.zephyrcorp.com/terminal-emulator-activex-document.htm is an example of such an ActiveX control.) Presumably these will run in IE on Wine, but will t

Re[4]: Linking wine *dll.so libraries with Linux applications ?!

Hello Dan, Friday, October 21, 2005, 5:08:44 PM, you wrote: > Use the Web, Luke! google takes you right to the man page for > each of these. > I suspect you're getting in over your head here, but if you're a strong > swimmer, you *might* survive :-) > BTW, have you checked to make sure there a

Re: user/defdlg.c: Just restore focus to current control [Bug:430]

Vitaliy Margolen wrote: Hmm, reverting my change didn't fix it. So I would say it was broken before. Vitaliy Yes, it seems so

Re: Re[2]: Linking wine *dll.so libraries with Linux applications ?!

On 10/21/05, Alexander Efremov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > :-( What is "longjmp" exactly and how it should look like ? > ... > Is LoadLibrary a Wine feature or Windows feature ? Use the Web, Luke! google takes you right to the man page for each of these. I suspect you're

Re: GDI/tests: link to {G|S}etRelAbs() during runtime

* On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > * "Saulius Krasuckas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am sure FreeLibrary() call wasn't necessary, but that might change in > > future (if gdi.dll gets linked only during runtime). Because of this I > > didn't want to FreeLibarary() right af

Re: user/defdlg.c: Just restore focus to current control [Bug:430]

Friday, October 21, 2005, 5:40:43 AM, Richard Cohen wrote: > Vitaliy Margolen wrote: >> Restore focus should not select all text in edit control. Only tabbing into >> it >> should do that (according to msdn). >> >> Vitaliy Margolen >> >> changelog: >> user/defdlg.c: >> - Restore focus to the

Re: GDI/tests: link to {G|S}etRelAbs() during runtime

"Saulius Krasuckas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sure FreeLibrary() call wasn't necessary, but that might change in > future (if gdi.dll gets linked only during runtime). Because of this I > didn't want to FreeLibarary() right after last call to GetProcAddress(), > so added it at the end

Re: Compile documentation problem

Vincent Béron wrote: Le jeu 20/10/2005 à 20:34, gslink a écrit : [snip] Let me explain the problem. I took your source from May and it compiled correctly. When I looked at your source I found that you had supplied some additional code in the form of three patches. Among the other things su

Re: enhmfdrv: Return proper values from GDI APIs

Phil Krylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are there any problems to apply this patch before 0.9? I think it would be cleaner to simply fall through to the generic code after calling the driver for these operations. Also there's no need to add a FIXME on every single operation, this will cause a l

Re: [DOCS] winedlloverrides

- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Ernst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For more informations about DLL overrides, please refer to section 3.1.2.1 of this guide. This 3.1.2.1 is likely to change, can we have a symbolic reference instead? -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.

Re: Final call for bug fixes

From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to > release on Tuesday. Speaking of which, what's the status for our FC builds? We really need binary builds for Fedora for this release. It would be a pitty to fail to provide binar

Re: Final call for bug fixes

Alexandre Julliard wrote: I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up... What about the toolbar bug? It makes Front Pane

Re: enhmfdrv: Return proper values from GDI APIs

Writing some tests would probably help. Huw. On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:57:58PM +0400, Phil Krylov wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any problems to apply this patch before 0.9? > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:43:55 +0400 > Phil Krylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This patch fixes EMF ren

Re: enhmfdrv: Return proper values from GDI APIs

Hi, Are there any problems to apply this patch before 0.9? On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:43:55 +0400 Phil Krylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This patch fixes EMF rendering in some programs that depend on the fact > that SetTextAlign(), SetBkMode(), SetROP2(), SetPolyFillMode(), and > SetStret

Final call for bug fixes

Folks, I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up... -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wine / Linux kernel, TWAIN and STI: explained

> A lot of you seem to not understand... > > In Windows: > > Windows App > v > TWAIN > v > TWAIN backend (scanner-specific) > v > (other vendor-specific components) > v > STI (made by Microsoft) > v > STI minidriver (made by vendor) > v > KERNEL32.DLL (ReadFile, WriteFile, DeviceIoCont

Re: wine / Linux kernel interaction

> Yes it does, look at include/ddk/usbscan.h in mingw32, > or MSDN's STI/WIA documentation, the section on > USBSCAN.SYS. Reading and writing do raw bulk pipe > transfers, ioctl's do specific things: particular > ioctl's (USBSCAN_READ_REGISTERS, > USBSCAN_WRITE_REGISTERS, > USBSCAN_SEND_DEVICE_REQU

RE: wine / Linux kernel, TWAIN and STI: explained

> From: Saulius Krasuckas > > * On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > --- Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > May the ReactOS code tree help you? > > > http://reactos.geldorp.nl/dir_000323.html > > > > Nice! Why isn't this part of wine already? > > AFAIK, Some pa

Re: wine / Linux kernel, TWAIN and STI: explained

* On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > --- Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > > > I had a brief look at the Windows 2000 STI.DLL > > > import table: most of the SetupAPI functions > > > it uses are stubs on wine :-(.

Re: user/defdlg.c: Just restore focus to current control [Bug:430]

Vitaliy Margolen wrote: Restore focus should not select all text in edit control. Only tabbing into it should do that (according to msdn). Vitaliy Margolen changelog: user/defdlg.c: - Restore focus to the current control without selecting text As with Vijay's patch, this patch breaks TABbi

Re: wine / Linux kernel, TWAIN and STI: explained

--- Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > --- Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > You might have to have a userspace winelib > daemon > > > listening for requests from the kernel, and > > > fulfilling them by calling the

Re[2]: Linking wine *dll.so libraries with Linux applications ?!

Hello Troy, Thursday, October 20, 2005, 10:49:18 PM, you wrote: > OK, then you will need to use the longjmp method. I do not know what is "longjmp" method :-( > You should have an arrangement that looks something like this: > 1. Your DLL that wants to call the Win32 API links to a > "s

Re: bug 2398: OpenGL, child windows, and wine

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:25:42PM +0200, Lionel Ulmer wrote: > Ah I understand now. Do you know when the 'in DIB section' patch will be > sent to wine-patches (maybe after the 0.9 freeze) ? Ok, here's a patch for fun. It has one really nasty hack that needs to be sorted out - that's how to keep

Re: wine / Linux kernel, TWAIN and STI: explained

* On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > --- Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You might have to have a userspace winelib daemon > > listening for requests from the kernel, and > > fulfilling them by calling the registry API. > > I had a brief look at the Windows 2000 STI.DLL

Re: wine / Linux kernel, TWAIN and STI: explained

--- Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/20/05, Damjan Jovanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > *Changed CreateFile() to check for \\.\USBSCAN..., > and > > if so open /dev/USBSCAN... instead of calling > > VXD_Open(). Then it does > wine_server_fd_to_handle(). > > ... > > The kernel m

Re: wine / Linux kernel interaction

* On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > * --- Troy Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Microtek ScanMaker 3800 > > > > Have you looked at > > ? > > And tried it. The scanner protocol is virtually > identical, but a few little differences here and

Re: wine / Linux kernel interaction

--- Troy Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:20, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > --- Troy Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:15, Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > > > > Because the scanner, like too many others, is > > > > unsupported by SANE. > > > > > > Wh