Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 10:57:48 PM, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
>>On October 5, 2005 03:56 pm, Robert Shearman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There is a port of that function into
>>>
>>>wineserver in server/token.c called map_generic_mask that I
>>>used for the purpose of mapping generi
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
0x7ffe is SharedUserData that is present on all NT+ systems. It's format
only documented in DDK for kernel address space and only for some first several
values.
This structure keeps growing as I understand and no one except MS knows what's
all in it. We do need this s
You can see the start of what's there in include/ddk/wdm.h, it's the
KSHARED_USER_DATA struct.
It's meant to be read only memory for user mode.
Ivan.
Juan Lang wrote:
Index: dlls/ole32/compobj.c
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/ole32/compobj.c,v
retrieving revision 1.165
diff -u -r1.165 compobj.c
--- dlls/ole32/compobj.c3 Oct 2005 11:02:37 - 1.165
+++ dlls/ole
Dieter Komendera wrote:
Hi people,
I was hanging around in the winehq irc channel
for one and a half month or so.
I recognized that many questions are asked frequently.
Then a good FAQ should do.
Ivan.
Bill Medland wrote:
On October 5, 2005 03:56 pm, Robert Shearman wrote:
There is a port of that function into
wineserver in server/token.c called map_generic_mask that I
used for the purpose of mapping generic access rights in the
token functions. The problem with translating from generic
a
Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 9:24:00 PM, Robert Reif wrote:
> I am getting this exception:
> Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x7ffe02d8 in 32-bit
> code (0x51102a96).
> and I found this in winternal.h:
#if (_WIN32_WINNT >>= 0x0501)
> #define INTERNAL_TS_ACTIVE_CONSOLE_ID ( *((v
"Juan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, one more spam. I want to generate a new code page file for code
> page 20261, the T.61 (Teletex) code page. The comments in the c_*.c files
> in libs/unicode say the files are generated, so I was wondering.. by what?
They are generated by libs/unic
Okay, one more spam. I want to generate a new code page file for code
page 20261, the T.61 (Teletex) code page. The comments in the c_*.c files
in libs/unicode say the files are generated, so I was wondering.. by what?
There's no file for 20261 on the unicode.org web site, but I wrote a
Windows
I am getting this exception:
Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x7ffe02d8 in 32-bit
code (0x51102a96).
and I found this in winternal.h:
#if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0501)
#define INTERNAL_TS_ACTIVE_CONSOLE_ID ( *((volatile ULONG*)(0x7ffe02d8)) )
#endif /* (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0501) */
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 20:05, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Michael Ost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does this patch look dangerous in any way to those of you who know your
> > way around this code? It's done in NtCreateFile after a bunch of
> > non-file types (like mail slots, etc) are handled.
"Michael Ost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this patch look dangerous in any way to those of you who know your
> way around this code? It's done in NtCreateFile after a bunch of
> non-file types (like mail slots, etc) are handled.
While this patch may work for you it's certainly not correct.
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 21:08, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Michael Ost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My "solution" (polite term) was to force GENERIC_READ|GENERIC_WRITE
> > access in ntdll/NtCreateFile if the sharing type is FILE_SHARE_WRITE.
>
> Most likely sharing mode has nothing to do with acce
Just who is the bugzilla maintainer, anyway? Newman? It'd be nice if it
were easier to find that out..
Anyway, I'd like to have permission to accept bugs. Shouldn't all of the
hackers have that ability?
Thanks,
--Juan
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Maga
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 22:38 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
> Done, except for shdocvs as I don't have clean todo list
> for this one.
Great! This has been very helpful (at least for me) in
understanding better where we are.
> I have been looking at it while writing MSHTML. I'd like
> to have shdocvw w
On October 5, 2005 03:56 pm, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> >"Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>It is an additional flags to the rest of the file flags
> >> because they are transferred all the way to the kernel. And
> >> being translated into specific access righ
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is an additional flags to the rest of the file flags because they are
transferred all the way to the kernel. And being translated into specific access
rights by an object manager according to the object type. It has ar
Hi people,
I was hanging around in the winehq irc channel
for one and a half month or so.
I recognized that many questions are asked frequently.
So I want to ask you, what you think about an irc-bot in the
channel, that logs everything that's written.
The idea is to create archives (like the mail
On fedora core 4 and wine version 20050930 and CVS from 20051005 I get
wineesd error during make depend. Can anyone giver me hints on figuring
out whats making it hiccup. Sorry if this has already been discussed just
joined the list, I did look through the archive though and didn't see
any
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 04:38, Vincent Béron wrote:
> I posted the RH7.3 & RH8 to sf.net. I intended to make them available
> once all distributions would be compiled/uploaded, but since there's
> demand for them, go to
Thanks! That's a great help. ... mo
Hello.
A detailed and explicit TODO listing all the known missing
bits on the Wiki page would be golden.
Done, except for shdocvs as I don't have clean todo list
for this one.
Ditto for this one, with maybe a plan of attack (if you
have one) and some effort estimate (if you know).
I ha
> "Kuba" == Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Several years ago I had my programmer and one other device working
>> with dosemu and or bochs but after I updated from Mandrake 8.2 I
>> think I have not been able to get it working again. I think the
>> kernel has changed o
> Several years ago I had my programmer and one other device working with
> dosemu and or bochs but after I updated from Mandrake 8.2 I think I have
> not been able to get it working again. I think the kernel has changed on
> hardware access and will require special driver to allow simulated
> dire
please use '\r' and '\n' instead of their numeric values
A+
and grow the buffer of a count of 2 as you're adding two chars
A+
--
Eric Pouech
Jonathan Ernst wrote:
Again an old patch that was lost in bugzilla...
Fixes Bug 2509 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2509)
Changelog:
Joshua Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
It looks like windows is returning the length of the string, plus the CRLF
delimiters, whereas wineconsole is return
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:24:46AM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Wine has 2 DDraw drivers: An accellerated HAL driver and a software-based
> user
> driver. I've noticed that the HAL driver uses many basic functionality from
> the user + gdi driver, and that the hal driver is the prefered one.
On 10/5/05, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually I think a bunch of volunteers has gone over most
> of the issue manually now...
>
> This lead to more instantely closed bugs ;)
>
> So an automated approach is no longer necessary I guess.
There does seem to be a lot of progress rec
Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, fixed that but the linker still insists on including main() in the
> shared
> library. If I remove libwinecrt0.a from the link then the link goes OK and nm
> shows no references to main() in the shared library. Perhaps wine should have
> differe
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 21:44, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, thats the way I see it, from what I can see winegcc is being called
> > with -shared but is not emitting -shared in the subsequent gcc command
> > and includes libwinecrt0.a which wou
Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, thats the way I see it, from what I can see winegcc is being called with
> -shared but is not emitting -shared in the subsequent gcc command and
> includes libwinecrt0.a which would be wrong for linking a shared library.
> Seems winegcc is broke
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 21:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Under solaris I get some undefined references popping up from yesterdays
> > cvs (that I'm not used to seeing).
> > Undefined first referenced
> > symbol
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 21:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Under solaris I get some undefined references popping up from yesterdays
> > cvs (that I'm not used to seeing).
> > Undefined first referenced
> > symbol
Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Under solaris I get some undefined references popping up from yesterdays cvs
> (that I'm not used to seeing).
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> GetStartupInfoA ../../dl
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 07:27, Robert Lunnon wrote:
> Under solaris I get some undefined references popping up from yesterdays
> cvs (that I'm not used to seeing).
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> GetStartupInfoA
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:07:39AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >>http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html
> >
> >I am not sure that I like this approach.
> >It might appear to our users that we do not care.
>
> I bet we can word the message to avoid that appearance.
>
> We
Rob D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I built gcc with the recommended options, but still getting similar errors
> from the assembler pass of winegcc:
>
> ../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../tools/winebuild -shared
> ./d3d8.specbasetexture.o cubetexture.o d3d8_main.o device.o directx.o
> draw
> > I have seen one occurence in a program (SubtitleWorkshop) compressed by UPX
> > (an exepacker).
I correct myself, this is either a bug in the program, or "GetObject" should
memset(0) the passed buffer even on failure to look up the handle.
Ciao, Marcus
I have myself seen eMule crashing with BadMatch errors.
When I run it with richedit as native, the BadMatch goes away.
Maxime
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 08:00 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:17:02AM +0200, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
> > A lot of people are complaining about BadM
38 matches
Mail list logo
