* On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> > * On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:43 +0100, Richard Cohen wrote:
> > >
> > > Dont't you mean text/x-patch?
> >
> > Right, I added both. Since some pass it as text/x-patch, and some pass
> > text/x-diff.
>
>
On 9/5/05, Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Christoph Frick wrote:
>
> > i am currently trying rFactor with WINE. the config programm wants dx9C
> > - the current version with the last release version of wine is dx9B.
> > where would i find this so i can fake a higher version? a naïv
"Troy Rollo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even as things are now there is a disincentive to new developers. Some
> developers don't bother submitting patches because they feel it's too much
> work to get them accepted,
Right, if the patch is a pure hack, or of a bad quality, it won't be accepte
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
We need ntoskrnl to run some subset of drivers on wine. Notably cd protection
drivers. They are not a hardware drivers, but a means to access something that
is not accessible from user space. So in a sense ntoskrnl is just a process to
run those drivers in, and send/recei
Christoph Frick wrote:
i am currently trying rFactor with WINE. the config programm wants dx9C
- the current version with the last release version of wine is dx9B.
where would i find this so i can fake a higher version? a naïve grep
found nothing in my source.
Have a look at the file:
wine/d
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:59, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> committed. Also I've recently noticed that very few of the patches being
> submitted are being committed, mainly because Alexandre appears to be
> *very* busy with some work (mac support maybe?),
He may well be very busy with something else, but at
Troy Rollo wrote:
The process requires that
developers risk their work amounting to nothing because it won't be accepted.
How many times have you seen people say that "Alexandre doesn't always know
what he wants, but he knows what he doesn't want"?.
That's a problem vitaly and I now have, nto
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:30, Francois Gouget wrote:
> What makes you say that?
> What would need changing to efficiently accomodate more developpers?
I should preface this by saying that I don't mean any criticism or offence by
this. You asked the question and the following reflects my observation
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:30:41 -0700, Hiji wrote:
Firstly, Wine is not an emulator, it it a binary loader and an
implementation of the Win32 API.
Bingo. It irritates me when people call Wine an emulator. ALEX, did you
know that Wine stands for "Wine Is Not an Emulat
Eric Pouech wrote:
> I don't see why you need to return something. If NtTerminateProcess()
fails, then just call exit(status).
More importantls a function declared as void shoulnd't ever return anything,
I'll send a new patch.
Ivan.
Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
As NtTerminateProcess alredy exists in ntdll, there's no reason to call
wineserver directly.
Ivan.
I don't see why you need to return something. If NtTerminateProcess() fails,
then just call exit(status).
A+
--
Eric Pouech
Hahaha, Wine is just great, patch that just came in :
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020456.html
seems to fix the problem
___
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:30:41 -0700, Hiji wrote:
>> Firstly, Wine is not an emulator, it it a binary loader and an
>> implementation of the Win32 API.
>
> Bingo. It irritates me when people call Wine an emulator. ALEX, did you
> know that Wine stands for "Wine Is Not an Emulator"??
It's playing
Using native comctl32 makes the installer proceed; is
this also caused by theming patches that got in? See
for example http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3241
___
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holi
> What makes you say that?
> What would need changing to efficiently accomodate more developpers?
>
> I'm asking because I don't see a problem with the current organisation
> but I may be missing something. If there are issues it's best to get
> them out in the open so we can work on fixing them.
> Firstly, Wine is not an emulator, it it a binary
> loader and an
> implementation of the Win32 API.
Bingo. It irritates me when people call Wine an
emulator. ALEX, did you know that Wine stands for
"Wine Is Not an Emulator"??
Hiji
__
Do You Ya
Can anyone test PHP Expert Editor for install? It uses InstallShield
and install loop at message "File access denied."
http://www.ankord.com/download/phpxedit_33.zip
--
Vitaly Lipatov, ALT Linux Team
Russia, Saint-Petersburg, www.etersoft.ru
The patch to fix that error is at
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/attachments/20050903/636b08f6/protect-ff-status.diff
The headers are correctly detected but the use of the constants was
not protected.
--Daniel Remenak
On 9/5/05, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I got th
Hi I got this compile error from current cvs:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jesse/.local/build/wine/dlls/dinput'
gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -
We need ntoskrnl to run some subset of drivers on wine. Notably cd protection
drivers. They are not a hardware drivers, but a means to access something that
is not accessible from user space. So in a sense ntoskrnl is just a process to
run those drivers in, and send/receive requests to/from those d
Duane Clark wrote:
As of the current CVS, the problem seems to have disappeared for me. It
is not clear to me what patch fixed it.
Oops, spoke too soon. Still there.
hiho,
i am currently trying rFactor with WINE. the config programm wants dx9C
- the current version with the last release version of wine is dx9B.
where would i find this so i can fake a higher version? a naïve grep
found nothing in my source.
--
cu
pgpMCIsIXwxcJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le 02 septembre à 20:37:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| It is possible that you are getting caught out by a modal dialogue that is
| not being brought to the top of the z-order : ie not comming to the front.
>
| I wrote about this in one of my msgs earlier this year but you may have
|
On 05.09.2005 14:49, Michael Kaufmann wrote:
> I've found another problem: Reading the window proc address with
> GetWindowLong won't work for subclassed windows. We need to pass the
> window proc as a parameter to UnmapMsg32ATo32W (and probably also to
> other mapping functions).
>
> Maybe it's e
But apart from that, why is the patch not CVS-worthy?
Due how the WM_GETTEXT is "dispatched" (ie calling the proc) - but that
would be solved with SendMessageW().
I've found another problem: Reading the window proc address with
GetWindowLong won't work for subclassed windows. We nee
On 05.09.2005 11:23, Michael Kaufmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does Windows XP use Unicode controls too if theming is on?
Yes. (Technically, it uses Unicode controls when comctl 6.0 is used.)
-f.r.
On 05.09.2005 11:23, Michael Kaufmann wrote:
> I think you could use SendMessageW instead of calling the window proc
> directly.
Yeah... since UnmapMsg32ATo32W is used for both in-process and
inter-process communications, just using SendMessageW() is more correct
and less hassle than messing wit
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Troy Rollo wrote:
[...]
Secondly, even if there were sufficient manpower, the way the Wine project is
currently structured would prevent the manpower from being used efficiently.
What makes you say that?
What would need changing to efficiently accomodate more developpers?
Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hehehe, now I see it dies by cathing exeption when ir tries to read
> 0x, though "make test" doesn't say this is an error.
>
> Alexandre, is this intentional behaviour of an in-tree testing framework?
> (to treat crashes during "make test"
Alex Tanner wrote:
I can't understand why the members of the Wine project
are always complaining about lack of manpower.
The lack of manpower is probably due to there being
different flavours of Wine developed by different
companies.
[...]
I think you overestimate the real number of Wine forks
Hi,
Does Windows XP use Unicode controls too if theming is on?
Because the Delphi edit controls are now in Unicode mode, the messages
sent to them have to be translated from ANSI to Unicode and back. When a
program reads the "Text" property of a TEdit control, Delphi sends a
WM_GETTEXTLENGTH me
* On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Paul Vriens wrote:
> * On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 16:17 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> >
> > SHELL32.dll.ILFindLastID is exported by an ordinal on an older
> > platforms.
> ...
> > /* This test shows that Windows doesn't allocate a new pidlLast, but
> > returns a poi
32 matches
Mail list logo
