John Smith wrote:
As a Win developer, I want to make a suggestion (sorry if it was already
discussed - or if similar mechanism already exists):
What if some simple way will be provided for Win developers to say which
options they prefer for WINE to use for their application? While it may
seem t
As a Win developer, I want to make a suggestion (sorry if it was already
discussed - or if similar mechanism already exists):
What if some simple way will be provided for Win developers to say which
options they prefer for WINE to use for their application? While it may seem
to somewhat contradi
* On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
>
> This is my first X-perience. Does this look OK, folks?
Proabably I should post a diff with a larger context to get an answer.
Sorry.
Index: dlls/ddraw/device_opengl.c
===
RCS f
I was walking through a Lionel code (written in 2003) and stumbled at the
call to XGetVisualInfo(). The list of visuals it returns is never
released. Hence, three lines were added.
This is my first X-perience. Does this look OK, folks?
Index: dlls/ddraw/device_opengl.c
===
* Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21/08/05, 20:15:55]:
> -ret = SECUR32_makeSecHandle(phContext, package, &myCtxt);
> +ret = SECUR32_makeSecHandle(phNewContext, package,
> &myCtxt);
> if (ret != SEC_E_OK)
> packag
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:26:29 +0900
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Phil Krylov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh sorry. For some reason I thought that HIWORD(wParam) is used for some
> > other data. Here is a new patch, is it ok?
>
> Looks good to me, let's see if Alexandre l
Hello.
Kevin Koltzau wrote:
Changelog
Remove 'cast to pointer from integer of different size' warnings in
64bit
Index: dlls/atl/registrar.c
===
Robert Reif wrote:
Fix
mixer detection for multiple sound cards.
This fixes a bug with the
previous patch
and adds some more debugging info.
Index: dlls/winmm/wineoss/mixer.c
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winmm/wi
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 19:22, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> Paul Vriens wrote:
>
> > the subject says it all. If yes, I will start adding some for the ones
>
> IMHO that's a good idea.
I have added this one as a TODO on my list. What version-number should
we give our DLLs. Some of them have already v