Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Tom Wickline
On 7/30/05, Anssi Hannula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if you already read my post, but I see now some very > strange numbers, like -326%. That would mean Wine had negative 3D marks :S :-) > > Just use the above formula (e.g. Wine's score always first), no matter > if wine has a be

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Anssi Hannula
Tom Wickline wrote: Does this look presentable? Much better now. Any more recommendations? The % are apparently calculated wrong. You should use: (Wine score / XP score) - 1 For example in the first CPU Marks you say XP 650, Wine 786, +18% However, (786 / 650) - 1 = 0.2092307692307692 ~

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Tom Wickline
On 7/28/05, Holger Dell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > has anyone ever tried to use grpof or any other profiling tool to > analyze, which code eats most cpu time (=bottlenecks). > normally, if you develop something, you first go for functionality and > after that for speed. it's not good for wine to

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Tom Wickline
On 7/30/05, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks great! I must admit that having XP on the left side may be > preferable, if it's not too much work. Does this look presentable? Any more recommendations? Anyone other than Mitchell think I should change "Wine vs. XP" to "Wine Difference

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Dimi Paun
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 05:43 -0400, Tom Wickline wrote: > I'm not finished, but I thought I would ask if this going in the right > direction? > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark Looks great! I must admit that having XP on the left side may be preferable, if it's not too much work. -- Dimi Paun <[E

Re: LoadString problems

2005-07-30 Thread Felix Nawothnig
James Hawkins wrote: Maybe that only returns the hinstance of the process calling the module, and not the hinstance of the module itself. Ofcourse it doesn't do that, how should it know from what module the call came from? (Yes, there are ways. But they are hackish, wouldn't work always and

Re: LoadString problems

2005-07-30 Thread James Hawkins
On 7/30/05, Frank Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30.07.2005 09:06, James Hawkins wrote: > >TCITEMA tie; > >char text[MAX_PATH]; > > > >LoadStringA(NULL, IDS_CONTENTS, text, MAX_PATH); > >/* text should be '&Contents', but we get a GetLastError() */ > > Hm, wouldn't it be b

Re: LoadString problems

2005-07-30 Thread James Hawkins
On 7/30/05, Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 30 July 2005 09:06, James Hawkins wrote: > > >LoadStringA(NULL, IDS_CONTENTS, text, MAX_PATH); > > MSDN documents the use of GetModuleHandle(NULL) as the first > argument to LoadString to get resource strings from the current

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Mitchell Mebane
Tom Wickline wrote: On 7/30/05, Felix Nawothnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tom Wickline wrote: I'm not finished, but I thought I would ask if this going in the right direction? http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark Much better, although Windows should rea

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Tom Wickline wrote: I'm not finished, but I thought I would ask if this going in the right direction? http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark Much better, although Windows should really be on the left side. Why? its Wine against XP ... not XP against Wine. Maybe it's just me (no it's not, someone el

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Tom Wickline
On 7/30/05, Felix Nawothnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Wickline wrote: > > I'm not finished, but I thought I would ask if this going in the right > > direction? > > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark > > Much better, although Windows should really be on the left side. Why? its Wine against XP

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Tom Wickline wrote: I'm not finished, but I thought I would ask if this going in the right direction? http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark Much better, although Windows should really be on the left side. Felix

Re: wine/dlls/ntdll loadorder.c

2005-07-30 Thread Rein Klazes
On 28 Jul 2005 11:46:46 +0200, you wrote: > Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > | trace:module:load_dll looking for L"comm.dll" in > > L"E:\\bin\\gt3\\GTWin;.;d:\\win98\\system;d:\\WIN98;d:\\windows;d:\\windows\\system;h:\\shared;r:\\x86\\Setup" > > | trace:module:MODULE_GetLoadOrderW

Re: LoadString problems

2005-07-30 Thread Frank Richter
On 30.07.2005 09:06, James Hawkins wrote: >TCITEMA tie; >char text[MAX_PATH]; > >LoadStringA(NULL, IDS_CONTENTS, text, MAX_PATH); >/* text should be '&Contents', but we get a GetLastError() */ Hm, wouldn't it be better use wide strings? -f.r.

Re: LoadString problems

2005-07-30 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Saturday 30 July 2005 09:06, James Hawkins wrote: >LoadStringA(NULL, IDS_CONTENTS, text, MAX_PATH); MSDN documents the use of GetModuleHandle(NULL) as the first argument to LoadString to get resource strings from the current module. Maybe passing NULL is an undocumented synonym for it that

Re: Benchmark's on the Wiki

2005-07-30 Thread Tom Wickline
On 7/28/05, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wine XP Wine vs. Win > 3DMark Result (marks): 14,606 13,332 +10% > CPU Speed (CPU Marks): 786650 +21% > ... > > I personally like the last one the best. I'm not finishe

LoadString problems

2005-07-30 Thread James Hawkins
Hey, I'm trying to load strings from the hhctrl.ocx resource file to use as the text for tabs and toolbar buttons, but I can't get it to work. I've tried to get LoadString to work a couple ways, but it just won't work for me. I've attached the resource files and Makefile.in. Maybe something is w