Yes, I saw your (perhaps old) patch for adding FF support to joydev
while I was doing some research before starting this project. I was
under the impression that the current Sidewinder PID driver was
working, though...a bit of poking at the code tells me I was pretty
wrong :) I use a Wingman Forc
Daniel Remenak wrote:
The newer interface has working
iForce (logitech, guillemot, et al) and MS sidewinder drivers written
for it, so that's the one I was targetting.
Well, if you mean the Sidewinder Force Feedback 2, that driver seems to
be only a stub. I am currently working on a new PID FF
Different issue. The issue I fixed was the unable to upload images
larger than 512K. This other issue is because move_uploaded_file() is
returning false. I did some debug and saw that
$_FILES['imageFile']['tmp_name'] was null. Looking at the error code it
says: The uploaded file exceeds the upload_
Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
Felix, I have reverted part of your patch and tested this. Reversion is
doing fine on WinME -- zero failed tests. Didn't tested on XP or so.
Is this acceptable? If so, feel free to submit it under own name. Or
correct the code. :-)
This is not really correct, Se
* On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * Felix Nawothnig wrote:
> >
> > Tested on Wine and WinXP. I couldn't verify it on WinME since I don't
> > have it but since this is quite trivial... *crosses fingers*
>
> Though three tests are still failing:
>
> | thread.c:293:not restricted,
Has anyone checked if the performance improvement stays if only the
pointers are set to const?
I'd also suggest running the test multiple times and averaging.
Felix Nawothnig wrote:
Andreas Mohr wrote:
While I'm not too convinced in this case (1.5% improvement sounds like
within statistic no
Hi Jeremy,
Still doesn't work. Same error. :(
James
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 13:28 -0500, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> The error we are getting is:
>
> Requested content-length of 1419105 is larger than the configured limit
> of 524288, referer:
> http://appdb.winehq.org/screenshots.php?appId=1383&versio
Peter Oberndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a bit of both :-)
> The dbghelp shipped with WinDbg has a SymSetParentWindow entry point which is
> not (yet) available in wine.
> So it catches fire when the function is called.
> Adding a SymSetParentWindow stub is easy but shouldn't it load
On Thursday 28 July 2005 23:14, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Peter Oberndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Same thing happens here with WinDbg 6.5.3.7 which comes with dbghelp.dll
> > in app directory.
>
> If you mean it fails to load dbghelp completely then that's a bug. If
> it's loading the b
On 7/28/05, Joe Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/05, Oliver Stieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know this isn't going to be too big an issue with many people but it
> would be nice if winecfg
> was usable with a 640x480 desktop, at the moment
> it's 20 or so pixels to tall an
Hi,
Robbert Xerox wrote:
Hi , i know this is not a wine-bug channel, but this
bug is affecting quite some apps, and seems to affect
more and more ...
At least five apps from wine-bug mailinglist throw up
an exception which either reads: "Assertion Failed
!bogus context in Local_Unwind()" or "in
Joe Baker wrote:
Well, in KDE use the Alt key and the left mouse to click and drag the
window from anywhere in the window to move it higher. I think that
blackbox supports this style of Window movement as well if you're on a
lighter resource computer as your resolution suggests.
This doesn't
Peter Oberndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Same thing happens here with WinDbg 6.5.3.7 which comes with dbghelp.dll in
> app directory.
If you mean it fails to load dbghelp completely then that's a bug. If
it's loading the builtin dbghelp instead of the native then it's a
feature
--
Alex
Daniel Remenak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Executive summary: In order for effects to be played, the correct
> ff_effect structure will need to be present; if you can't play the
> effects it's better not to detect the joystick as FF, because it's
> really not.
Well, if the structure is required
On 7/28/05, Oliver Stieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this isn't going to be too big an issue with many people but it would be nice if winecfg
> was usable with a 640x480 desktop, at the moment it's 20 or so pixels to tall and you can't see
> the ok/cancel butto
Executive summary: In order for effects to be played, the correct
ff_effect structure will need to be present; if you can't play the
effects it's better not to detect the joystick as FF, because it's
really not.
The structure is not used *yet*, but will be. There was an older
version of force fee
Perhaps i found the begin of an explanation, in NetBSD and linux , error
codes for mincore() are :
[EFAULT] vec points to an illegal address.
[EINVAL] addr is not a multiple of the system page size.
[EINVAL] len is equal to 0.
[ENOMEM]
Hi,
The axis and allies 2 demo installer requires native ole to install.
(http://www.atari.com.au/games/downloads.do?id=24)
On the up side, The bards Tale and Juiced demos now install more-or-less
correctly.
The Bards Tale uses a WISE + MSI installer and has some problems with labels
being p
Yeah, this is a long standing issue of using HTML output in an XML
document. In reality, you should not embed HTML in XML. I've done some
tricks in our parser to get it to work, but it still fails in certain
areas. The XML parser will convert any < to < and that is returned to
the browser. Any text
Hello.
I've sent a patch that makes MSHTML use Gecko to render
HTML. Unfortunately, it uses Windows Gecko, not Linux
one. Alexandre wrote me that it's impossible to get perfect
support for XEmbed container, so, although my
implementation was enough for Gecko, it can't go to CVS
and I should use W
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:13:02PM +0100, Oliver Stieber wrote:
> repacking can be quite CPU intensive and warhammer 40k is the only game so far
> that needs nonpower2 texture repacking so it's turned off by default but can
> be turned
> on via the following registry key:
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Softw
Hi,
I've reported before that I still had an issue with the version of 16bit
windows applications (and hence 16bit resource) reported by Process
Explorer. I've emailed the developer about this. His answer:
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 00:20, Mark Russinovich wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I make no effort to s
The error we are getting is:
Requested content-length of 1419105 is larger than the configured limit
of 524288, referer:
http://appdb.winehq.org/screenshots.php?appId=1383&versionId=1873
Apparently, Apache 2 in Red Hat has it's PHP4 configured with a limit of
512K on uploads. I had to change the
Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> @@ -235,14 +249,18 @@ static void create_hardware_branch(void)
> int i;
> HANDLE handle;
> char drive[] = ".\\A:";
> +char drive1[] = "A:\\";
> +UINT uNumber = 0;
>
> /* create entries for cdroms (skipping A: and B:)
hi,
Christoph Frick wrote on 07/28/2005 11:55 AM:
or is there a way to not only test "functionality" with tests but also "speed"?
i guess this
would be nice to find bottlenecks.
(maybe this is already done - if so excuse my ignorance ;))
has anyone ever tried to use grpof or any other profil
On 7/28/05, Oliver Stieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this isn't going to be too big an issue with many people but it would
> be nice if winecfg
> was usable with a 640x480 desktop, at the moment it's 20 or so pixels to tall
> and you can't see
> the ok/cancel buttons.
>
>
I agree, al
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:29:53AM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
> And just add a third column with +/- %'s
can the test runs be automated like the winetests? and so have them
updated automatically with different machines? or is there a way to not
only test "functionality" with tests but also "speed
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Dimi Paun wrote:
[...]
Wine XP Wine vs. Win
3DMark Result (marks): 14,606 13,332 +10%
CPU Speed (CPU Marks): 786650 +21%
...
I would exchange the Wine and XP columns. That would make the percentage
c
On 7/28/05, Holger Dell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hm, ok.
> what about native-linux ut2004 and q3, do they have benchmarks on linux,
> too? would be interesting to have the native version vs. wine version as
> well, wouldn't it?
GentooDemo 1 Demo2
388.3fp
Frank Richter wrote:
On 27.07.2005 17:36, Robert Shearman wrote:
You could make the code to using RedrawWindow(... RDW_UPDATENOW),
assuming that the paint functions it is calling are for the whole
control, not a component of the control.
Occasionally it does... afaics mostly stuff li
On 27.07.2005 17:36, Robert Shearman wrote:
> You could make the code to using RedrawWindow(... RDW_UPDATENOW),
> assuming that the paint functions it is calling are for the whole
> control, not a component of the control.
>
Occasionally it does... afaics mostly stuff like just drawing the focus
On 7/28/05, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wine XP Wine vs.
> Win
> 3DMark Result (marks): 14,606 13,332 +10%
> CPU Speed (CPU Marks): 786650 +21%
> ...
>
> I personally like the last one the
Hi *,
although I am not quite sure if this is the right list for my question,
I will try it anyway as I did not find a better list (e.g. jobs)...
Being a software development company with limited wine know-how, we are
would like to request if there is any interest at any of the developers
a
From: "Tom Wickline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is this what you guys had in mind?
> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark
>
> And just add a third column with +/- %'s
>
> Any other Recommendations?
Why repeat the measurements? Something like this
would be more desirable:
Wine
I know this isn't going to be too big an issue with many people but it would be
nice if winecfg
was usable with a 640x480 desktop, at the moment it's 20 or so pixels to tall
and you can't see
the ok/cancel buttons.
_
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Anssi Hannula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So Codeweavers' email/list server delayed my email for 11 hours so that
Paul would beat me to it and propose the same idea before me? unfair :P
Are you a subscriber of the mailing list with the address you were writing
from?
hi,
Michael Stefaniuc wrote on 07/28/2005 12:37 PM:
I do not think that MacOS X runs on his hardware. Using an other box for
that would be like comparing apples with oranges.
hm, ok.
what about native-linux ut2004 and q3, do they have benchmarks on linux,
too? would be interesting to have the
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 00:35 -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
>
> What I would like to do in the end is have two benchmark pages. Wine
> against XP and Wine old-version against wine current and show our
> progression/regression each six months or so. And have the diff
> column with +/- %'s for both page
On Thursday 28 July 2005 11:46, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | trace:module:load_dll looking for L"comm.dll" in
> > | L"E:\\bin\\gt3\\GTWin;.;d:\\win98\\system;d:\\WIN98;d:\\windows;d:\\win
> > |dows\\system;h:\\shared;r:\\x86\\Setup"
> > | trace:module:MO
Reading WWN 284 I noticed the following line:
stabilizing for release &.
And sure enough the source XML is buggy:
stabilizing for release &.
I believe the intent was the following to deal with the double parsing:
stabilizing for release <g>.
But really this double parsing i
On 7/28/05, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mac OS X benchmarking results (where available) would be cool.
> I do not think that MacOS X runs on his hardware. Using an other box for
> that would be like comparing apples with oranges.
That's one reason why I don't list Win2k or Win
Daniel Remenak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Configure checks for the availability of a new enough linux/input.h
> to support force feedback. This pretty much means any kernel 2.6 or
> kernel 2.4.x with the ff patchset found at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/libff/. Some of the structures
Holger Dell wrote:
Tom Wickline wrote on 07/28/2005 10:29 AM:
Is this what you guys had in mind? http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark
I don't think so. The table format I had expected is:
$(benchmark name) | $(wine result) | $(XP result) | $([any other
interesting OS] result)
Any other Reco
hi,
Tom Wickline wrote on 07/28/2005 10:29 AM:
Is this what you guys had in mind?
http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark
I don't think so. The table format I had expected is:
$(benchmark name) | $(wine result) | $(XP result) | $([any other
interesting OS] result)
Any other Recommendations?
Ma
"jean-marc DETREZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I made a little correction of "try_mmap_fixed" because it's seems to me
> that the function didn't really test the result (vec).
That's the way it should be, we don't care if the page is in core or
not, we only want to know if something is mappe
Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | trace:module:load_dll looking for L"comm.dll" in
> L"E:\\bin\\gt3\\GTWin;.;d:\\win98\\system;d:\\WIN98;d:\\windows;d:\\windows\\system;h:\\shared;r:\\x86\\Setup"
> | trace:module:MODULE_GetLoadOrderW looking for
> L"E:\\bin\\gt3\\GTWin\\comm.dll"
> | t
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm pretty sure Windows NT doesn't allow you to have direct access to
> the video memory so surely Windows must be doing it like this too?
> How do you suggest to fix the problem?
Windows will certainly let you access the video memory, but since we
ca
On 7/27/05, Anssi Hannula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anssi Hannula wrote:
> So Codeweavers' email/list server delayed my email for 11 hours so that
> Paul would beat me to it and propose the same idea before me? unfair :P
:-)
Hello Anssi,
Is this what you guys had in mind?
http://wiki.winehq.
"Anssi Hannula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Codeweavers' email/list server delayed my email for 11 hours so that
> Paul would beat me to it and propose the same idea before me? unfair :P
Are you a subscriber of the mailing list with the address you were writing
from?
--
Dmitry.
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alexander Yaworsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://migusoft.ru/misc/trace.bz2
> >
> > with added ERR()s, see attachment
> >
> > I cut the tail of log just before the first err:listbox. Note that
> > there are two listboxes on the form. Bot
Anssi Hannula wrote:
Tom Wickline wrote:
I put the Benchmark results that I posted to wine-devel back in April
on the Wiki.
http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark
I would appreciate any constitutive criticism to improve this page.
I think it would be easier to read if the wine and xp results were
51 matches
Mail list logo