> Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
>
>> On some systems the tag window is created as modal, but
>> doesn't get focus until the user clicks on
>> the dialogue box or the winetest window. I've found this on
>> windows server 2003 service pack 1,
>> Michael Jung has confirmed this happens on windows server
>> 2
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> On some systems the tag window is created as modal, but
> doesn't get focus until the user clicks on
> the dialogue box or the winetest window. I've found this on
> windows server 2003 service pack 1,
> Michael Jung has confirmed this happens on windows server
> 2003
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:03, bala saravanan wrote:
> When I use wine in the default redhat 9 kernel
> 2.4.20-8,
> i see that the wineserver and wine-pthread binaries
> are running. Whereas when i use the vannila kernel
> 2.4.20,
> wineserver and wine-kthread binaries are running.
It's Posix threads
On 6/14/05, Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That means we have 1 more license up for
> grabs. It's open to anyone.
Gone! Dimi got it.
-Brian
Feel free to update the wiki page with the appdb ideas here:
http://wiki.winehq.org/AppdbInfo
Chris
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:48 pm, David Lee Lambert wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 08:32 pm, Mitchell Mebane wrote:
> > I'm putting together a Summer of Code proposal for working on the AppDB.
Christian Costa wrote:
Message du 14/06/05 15:43
De : "Marcus Meissner"
A : "Christian Costa"
Copie à : "Marcus Meissner" , "Alexandre Julliard" , "Brian Vincent" , wine-devel@winehq.com
Objet : Re: [QUARTZ] Add FFMpeg video wrapper filter (take 3)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:49:59PM +0200, C
It's me again. The latest WoW patch (1.5.1) broke stuff again, and now I'm
unable to click on anything outside of menu items in game. The issue seems to
be related to camera angle, as I am able to click on items/people when I have
my camera positioned just right. It's basically unplayable at
"bala saravanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using wine-20040309 on my rehat 9 machine.
>
> When I use wine in the default redhat 9 kernel
> 2.4.20-8,
> i see that the wineserver and wine-pthread binaries
> are running. Whereas when i use the vannila kernel
> 2.4.20,
> wineserver and wine-
bala saravanan wrote:
When I use wine in the default redhat 9 kernel
2.4.20-8,
i see that the wineserver and wine-pthread binaries
are running. Whereas when i use the vannila kernel
2.4.20,
wineserver and wine-kthread binaries are running.
Redhat's kernel support the Native Posix Threads Libr
Hello,
I am using wine-20040309 on my rehat 9 machine.
When I use wine in the default redhat 9 kernel
2.4.20-8,
i see that the wineserver and wine-pthread binaries
are running. Whereas when i use the vannila kernel
2.4.20,
wineserver and wine-kthread binaries are running.
Can anyone explain the
"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > @@ -89,7 +91,7 @@ struct test
> > void (*func)(void);
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct test winetest_testlist[];
> > +static const struct test winetest_testlist[2];
>
> This isn't correct, the size is 2 only for standalone tests.
The
On Monday 13 June 2005 11:49 pm, Jeremy White wrote:
> What happens if you change the snd_pcm_open
> line to tweak the 3rd parameter from 0 to
> SND_PCM_NONBLOCK?
With that flag set it does get past that point, however
it ends up not detecting any devices.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Winamp $ WINEDEBUG=+wa
Well, I just sent in my proposal. We'll see what happens. :)
--Mitchell Mebane
--
I find that a great part of the information I have was acquired by looking up
something and finding something else on the way.
-- Franklin P. Adams
Michael Jung wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:00, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Hello, I need a fairly simple test run for me on windows service 2003
*without* service pack 1, if you can do this please drop me a line.
I do have access to a windows server 2003. In the system pro
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi guys,
has ANYONE done any testing with my experimental SetThreadPriority patch
which I mailed on May 15?
So far I haven't received any replies, despite this probably being rather
interesting, given that it is implemented by many of our winmm threads...
Or should this rema
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Mitchell
Mebane wrote:
I'll install a plain 2003 in a VM right now.
What do you need tested?
Get the latest winetest build from test.winehq.com/data and tell me if
the tag window gets focus as soon as it's created.
Ivan.
.
OK, origi
Surprise surprise, some people have found this not to happen on some
installation of xp and win2k3.
I think I'll leave the debugging of this to someone else.
Ivan.
A few weeks ago Ivan asked me about getting him a VMWare Workstation
license. I contacted VMWare and they graciously donated 5
licenses to Wine. I thought that was pretty generous of
them.
I contacted some people off-list about it, so now Ivan, Jacek, Hannu,
and James all have a copy of VMWare
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Detailed information about the values and their contents
> should go in the documentation, the comments are only here to
> make it easier to check that the documentation is up to date.
Yeah, agreed. But it would be so much easier to keep the docs
u
"Dimi Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is obviously way better then before, but I guess at the
> end of the day we care about the values. How are we going to
> keep track of those?
The goal of the comments is to allow to find the relevant pieces of
code; once you get there it's fairly eas
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> They do, the magic comment is on the RegOpenKey above. I'm only adding
> comments for registry keys, not for every possible value under them.
This is obviously way better then before, but I guess at the
end of the day we care about the values. How
"Dimi Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Log message:
> > Merged palette option processing into the main configuration code.
>
> Hmm, these don't seem to have the magic comments,
> is this intentional?
They do, the magic comment is on the RegOp
I posted the same message on wine-user list , but got no help.
Hi,
I was wondering if someone could help me on this issue.
I use a windows program that print direct to the printer, but it uses
the printer from the printer list, it doesn't use the port directly.
On Windows, to use the program
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Log message:
> Merged palette option processing into the main configuration code.
Hmm, these don't seem to have the magic comments,
is this intentional?
--
Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lattica, Inc.
On 6/14/05, Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>
> Which games have this problem?
It's not the game its self GTA III its the installer Ive got it
installing now :-)
And after getting it to install now it crashes on SafeDisk.
One of the errors I saved was:
Error Number: 0x80
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 08:32 pm, Mitchell Mebane wrote:
> I'm putting together a Summer of Code proposal for working on the AppDB.
> I've been talking with Chris Morgan, and he has a few suggestions, but I
> was looking for more. Does anybody have any features they'd like added
> to the AppDB,
On 6/14/05, Alex Villacís Lasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While trying to isolate an AVIFile bug, this other bug showed up. The
> function TransformFilter_Release tries to decrement a reference counter
> on a NULL pClock, which inmediately segfaults. This patch corrects this bug:
>
> Changelog
On some systems the tag window is created as modal, but doesn't get focus until the user clicks on
the dialogue box or the winetest window. I've found this on windows server 2003 service pack 1,
Michael Jung has confirmed this happens on windows server 2003 and windows xp service pack 2. I
don'
Kristiaan Lenaerts wrote:
One day further, one day wiser...
I learnt how to write tests... Windows XP works exaclty like the
original (wine) code, setting last error = ERROR_INVALID_INDEX.
Windows 98 however sets it = ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER (1). So, the
"fix" that made civilization work for me
> Message du 14/06/05 15:43
> De : "Marcus Meissner"
> A : "Christian Costa"
> Copie à : "Marcus Meissner" , "Alexandre Julliard" , "Brian Vincent" ,
> wine-devel@winehq.com
> Objet : Re: [QUARTZ] Add FFMpeg video wrapper filter (take 3)
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:49:59PM +0200, Christian
One day further, one day wiser...
I learnt how to write tests... Windows XP works exaclty like the
original (wine) code, setting last error = ERROR_INVALID_INDEX.
Windows 98 however sets it = ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER (1). So, the
"fix" that made civilization work for me is not the right one...
I'l
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:49:59PM +0200, Christian Costa wrote:
>
> > Message du 14/06/05 13:24
> > De : "Marcus Meissner"
> > A : "Christian Costa"
> > Copie à : "Marcus Meissner" , "Alexandre Julliard" , "Brian Vincent" ,
> > wine-devel@winehq.com
> > Objet : Re: [QUARTZ] Add FFMpeg video wr
Alexandre,
If the possible (even rare) presence of a libavcodec.so lib can causes troubles.
Would it be acceptable to force static linking with a configure check such as
this one?
dnl Check for avcodec lib
AVCODECLIBS=""
LIBS="/usr/lib/libavcodec.a -lz -lm"
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(ffmpeg/avco
Alexandre,
If the possible (even rare) presence of a libavcodec.so lib can causes troubles.
Would it be acceptable to force static linking with a configure check such as
this one?
dnl Check for avcodec lib
AVCODECLIBS=""
LIBS="/usr/lib/libavcodec.a -lz -lm"
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(ffmpeg
> Message du 14/06/05 13:24
> De : "Marcus Meissner"
> A : "Christian Costa"
> Copie à : "Marcus Meissner" , "Alexandre Julliard" , "Brian Vincent" ,
> wine-devel@winehq.com
> Objet : Re: [QUARTZ] Add FFMpeg video wrapper filter (take 3)
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:05:37PM +0200, Christian
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:05:37PM +0200, Christian Costa wrote:
>
> What do you mean by dlls?
> A shared version of libavcodec or a quartz.dll with libavcodec linked
> statically?
I meant seperate DLLs (dll.so files for WINE actually).
Is all needed to be in quartz.dll directly?
Or can you sp
On Sunday 12 June 2005 18:47, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I need some help to implement the debugger under Solaris. In particular I
> > need help with how ptrace interacts with the threading model under Linux
> > which I understand uses processes for th
What do you mean by dlls?
A shared version of libavcodec or a quartz.dll with libavcodec linked
statically?
Bye,
Christian
> Message du 14/06/05 08:50
> De : "Marcus Meissner"
> A : "Brian Vincent"
> Copie à : "Alexandre Julliard" , [EMAIL PROTECTED], wine-devel@winehq.com
> Objet : Re: [QUAR
Glen Kaukola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I was looking over the Janitorial section on the wiki, and it seems
> like flattening dlls is something I could definitely handle. Is this
> something that's still needed or wanted?
No, there's no real need to work on it. I'm already work
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:00, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Hello, I need a fairly simple test run for me on windows service 2003
> *without* service pack 1, if you can do this please drop me a line.
I do have access to a windows server 2003. In the system properties dialog it
says "Windows Server 200
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:08:00AM -0600, Brian Vincent wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2005 18:11:14 +0200, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > If there's only a static lib then I guess it's fine. Is that the case
> > on all major distros?
>
>
>
> I just dug through a bunch of dis
41 matches
Mail list logo
