Joaquín Fernández wrote:
> With my application (Route 66), it enables me to start copying files,
> however the progress bar never moves. However, the installer is doing
> something but seems to be stuck somewhere. Maybe some deadlocks.
I have had many problems with InstallShield but i was able to i
> With my application (Route 66), it enables me to start copying files,
> however the progress bar never moves. However, the installer is doing
> something but seems to be stuck somewhere. Maybe some deadlocks.
Español:
Yo tuve varios problemas con algunos programas que usan InstallShield como inst
Le mer 30/03/2005 à 00:40, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
[snip]
> Other than that, are all strncpy() instances gone? If so we should
> also nuke strncpyW() from wine/unicode.h too.
No, they're not all gone yet (or are in not applied patches).
Vincent
Le ven 01/04/2005 à 17:06, Kuba Ober a écrit :
[snip]
> All that without touching the kernel in any way. And I mean
> here full support for *any* usb device, rain or shine. Network adapters
> (visible in wine only, but so what?),
Does that mean we'd need a database of USB identifiers?
For netwo
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 06:52:07PM +0200, Dietrich Teickner wrote:
> I have some weeks before reported, FlashFXP v3.02 loops with a
> message-loop in listview.c after login. It does this in Odin and in Wine.
> In Odin it stops in smaller time (deep 1000). Wine has a bigger stack,
> and so needs w
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 02:20, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> 2) What's almost never been brought up on wine-devel is the
> unit testing in the XP sense.
The problem is you need to write a stub interface for all of the
functions the function or library you are testing due to all the
cross-calls win32
> I am not trying to _load_ a Windows driver (that
> either requires kernel support for the Windows DDK,
> like ndiswrapper has, or emulation of an entire x86,
> like bochs does).
Not really. It just needs some sort of device-class-specific forwarding
protocol. usbfs and libusb already do that, a
> > I've been trying to add STI (still image) support to
> > Wine, and I've made some progress. However, I see a
> > deep and unsurmountable need to add (at least
> > user-space) device drivers to Wine, and I would like
> > some feedback on these ideas.
>
> Drivers belong in the kernel.
Not necess
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:31:33PM -0700, Brian Vincent wrote:
> I'm going to start this off with a huge apology - there's a very real
> chance I've asked someone to do a presentation and it's not on this
> list. If so, you need to email me to remind me. If you were
> definitely planning on prese
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:04:32 +0200
Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I think the reason for my boxes was that I didn't install
> symbol.ttf from Windows (I had only a "Symbol Set BT" and bitmap fonts
> before).
Yes, I also noticed some problems with font substitution...
-- Ph.
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hmm, I think the reason for my boxes was that I didn't install
symbol.ttf from Windows (I had only a "Symbol Set BT" and bitmap fonts
before). Anyway,
both displaying in the application _and_ (thanks to the patch) exporting
to RTF work now.
Wine can compile fonts from the sf
With my application (Route 66), it enables me to start copying files,
however the progress bar never moves. However, the installer is doing
something but seems to be stuck somewhere. Maybe some deadlocks.
Max
PS(specially for Mike): I'm a man :)
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 18:02 +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrot
Title: RE: WineConf Agenda
In presenting the commercial value of wine and why we chose to use it, etc. How much time do I have for the presentation?
-Original Message-
From: Jakob Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: W
Hello,
Phil Krylov wrote:
Before it showed a beta character from the Symbol font, now it only
shows a box ("[]").
Did you check later CVS? I tried to read an RTF containing beta from the
Symbol font both as 'b' (CP_SYMBOL codepage) and as 0xF062 (Unicode),
and both did look like betas on the screen
> "Mike" == Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:53:36 +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> nearly all recent install shield installer fail for me, similar like:
Mike> I debugged this a bit with Maxime Bellenge, she sent me a full
Mike> trace which reveal
> "Mike" == Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 12:03:46 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>>> nearly all recent install shield installer fail for me, similar
>>> like:
Mike> Which InstallShield version is this?
A "strings" on the installation file gi
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:54:12 -0500, you wrote:
> As for the initial problem that I've
> reported (http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/09/0748.html),
> you are correct, it's about interaction with the invalidated region.
> I've figured that while you have your hands wet in that code, ma
Brian Vincent wrote:
I think a full agenda would be about 11 items. If you would like to
present something let me know - there's definitely space available.
If you've been wondering, "There's a neat project I'd like to do if I
could only get a few more people interested", well, this is the
perfec
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Mitchell
Mebane wrote:
Hey there,
I ran it on my XP Pro SP2 desktop and Windows Server 2003 under VMWare
just fine, but when I ran it on Win2K Pro SP4 under VMWare, it told me
the log was too large (6.4 MB > 1 MB) and it would only send partial
results. I
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:53:36 +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> nearly all recent install shield installer fail for me, similar like:
I debugged this a bit with Maxime Bellenge, she sent me a full trace which
revealed that this is a known problem. Here is a quick hacky patch to work
around it:
Index: stu
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 12:03:46 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> nearly all recent install shield installer fail for me, similar like:
Which InstallShield version is this?
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:53:36AM +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> nearly all recent install shield installer fail for me, similar like:
> ...
> fixme:ole:RegisterTypeLib Registering non-oleautomation interface!
> fixme:sync:SetNamedPipeHandleState 0x1f0 0x42ad30e0 (nil) (nil)
> fixme:sync:S
Hello,
nearly all recent install shield installer fail for me, similar like:
...
fixme:ole:RegisterTypeLib Registering non-oleautomation interface!
fixme:sync:SetNamedPipeHandleState 0x1f0 0x42ad30e0 (nil) (nil)
fixme:sync:SetNamedPipeHandleState 0x214 0x42ddc0e0 (nil) (nil)
fixme:ole:RpcChannelBu
23 matches
Mail list logo
