Actually, I think the test is just the wrong way round. It should read
if (STGM_SHARE_MODE(grfMode) != STGM_SHARE_EXCLUSIVE)
I screwed it up in the following commit:
http://cvs.winehq.org/cvsweb/wine/dlls/ole32/storage32.c.diff?r1=1.71&r2=1.72&f=h
Mike
Troy Rollo wrote:
StgOpenStorage was failing
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
We should just get rid of the thread and the critical section altogether,
comctl32 6.0 is documented not to support it anymore. But before we do
that, let's try to fix this, so we have good code in CVS :)
If you get rid of the thread, programs that don't run a message loop o
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:31:24PM +0100, Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> The current CVS version has a regression in the animate control, causing
> a deadlock, most probably in WM_DESTROY handler, in the app I'm testing
> Wine with.
We should just get rid of the thread and the critical section altog
anyone know why this patch hasn't been accepted?
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2005/03/0328.html
Tom
Hi all,
Wine is ronning just fine, and our program.exe is working, I just want to
know if it is possible to create a shorcut of our program on our desktop
so that a end user will just click the icon on the desktop to run the
program.exe without typing on th text command "wine program.exe".
TYIA!
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Ouch. Of course, should have thought of that. Maybe we
need a patch penguin?
CVS actually handles 'vendor branches' fairly nicely. It should be
possible for Jakob (or whoever else decides to be the 'test penguin')
to maintain hi
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:35:25AM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
Will anyone demo CXtest? I think it would be great.
http://www.cxtest.org/
I think that's one of those topics that Brian is holding in reserve;
we'll be more than happy to demo it.
Nice stuff!
Will
Paul Millar wrote:
On Thursday 17 March 2005 11:54, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Maybe one could script something up so that a commit to
tests CVS would not be *possible* without a confirmed test
pass on Windows 95, NT, 2000 and XP.
That'd be the best thing since sliced bread.
CVS supports doing some ser
With the emulation mode set to "winxp" I can only TlsAlloc 64 indexes,
even though the MSDN docs say there should be at least 20 million.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/thread_local_storage.asp
Has anyone done any work on this? Any workaround/hackaro
The current CVS version has a regression in the animate control, causing
a deadlock, most probably in WM_DESTROY handler, in the app I'm testing
Wine with.
trace:message:SPY_ExitMessage (0x10038) L"{SysAnimate32}" message
[0047] WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED returned
trace:message:SPY_EnterMess
This patch adds multiple sound card support to the ALSA driver.
My system shows 3 sound devices: a builtin sound card,
a builtin modem and a usb sound card.
The wave regression tests have problems with the modem.
I'm not sure it is an ALSA problem or a problem with this
patch.
Could someone familia
> IStiDeviceControl are probably part of the Windows DDK
> (Device Driver Kit), and that you get separately from
> Microsoft (for a ridiculous price).
It's a free CD. You pay only for shipping. If you want, I've got two of those
and can transfer one of them to be taken care of by the wine folks.
Robert Reif wrote:
Use real names for wave device also.
Please disregard this patch. I will present a better one shortly.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Ouch. Of course, should have thought of that. Maybe we
need a patch penguin?
CVS actually handles 'vendor branches' fairly nicely. It should be
possible for Jakob (or whoever else decides to be the 'test penguin') to
maintain his own 'testing' CVS tree,
A bit OT, well kinda.
I'm trying to stabilize offscreen rendering in DirectX 9, I know Jason was
thinking of doing a demo.
Is there going to be another wine release before wine conf so I can merge
DirectX and do you still plan to do a demo Jason, if so what are you time-lines
for something st
Paul Millar wrote:
On Thursday 17 March 2005 11:51, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Paul Millar wrote:
[writing tests]'s a rather weary job, which no one enjoys doing
:^/
I do! Maybe I have a condition, but I really love doing it! :-)
Long may that continue!
Thanks, I hope so too! :-)
On Thursday 17 March 2005 11:51, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> Paul Millar wrote:
> >[writing tests]'s a rather weary job, which no one enjoys doing
> > :^/
>
> I do! Maybe I have a condition, but I really love doing it! :-)
Long may that continue!
[...]
> > [separate CVS tree]
> This makes sense. Win
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Maybe one could script something up so that a commit to
tests CVS would not be *possible* without a confirmed test
pass on Windows 95, NT, 2000 and XP.
That would be very hard to do and mostly pointless for drivers.
Sometimes hard is worthwile. At least
On Thursday 17 March 2005 11:54, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> Maybe one could script something up so that a commit to
> tests CVS would not be *possible* without a confirmed test
> pass on Windows 95, NT, 2000 and XP.
> That'd be the best thing since sliced bread.
CVS supports doing some server-side va
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:35:25AM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
> >
> >Will anyone demo CXtest? I think it would be great.
> >
> >http://www.cxtest.org/
>
> I think that's one of those topics that Brian is holding in reserve;
> we'll be more than happy to demo it.
Nice stuff!
Will you have de
Will anyone demo CXtest? I think it would be great.
http://www.cxtest.org/
I think that's one of those topics that Brian is holding in reserve;
we'll be more than happy to demo it.
Jer
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest to add the following janitorial projects for Wine:
> >
> > 1. Fix Wine to be compilable by a 64-bit compiler
> > 2. Fix wrong assumptions in Wine about endianess.
>
> I'd say go for it.
Dimi, could you please send a patch? I
Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is getting big enough I might as well float a patch by.
>
> ChangeLog: start of implementation of IPropertyStorage
This breaks the tests:
storage32.c:481: Test failed: failed to create property set storage
storage32.c:489: Test failed: failed to crea
This following patch breaks the file open dialog, so if your file open
dialog box crashes in the CVS, this is the thing to revert.
_dbg_ILGetNext doesn't seem to return NULL if pidl->mkid.cb is zero...
Mike
Filip Navara wrote:
_dbg_ILGetNext returns NULL if pidl->mkid.cb is zero, fix the
loops ac
Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Maybe one could script something up so that a commit to
tests CVS would not be *possible* without a confirmed test
pass on Windows 95, NT, 2000 and XP.
That would be very hard to do and mostly pointless for drivers.
Ivan.
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
I'll see if I can get it from the ReactOS people. Does
anyone else on this mailing list have the Windows DDK
around and a spare stiusd.h they want to share?
Are you planning to write an STI mini-driver or just trying to load one?
I don't think you'll have much success trying
On Thursday 17 March 2005 10:33, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> Apart from all of Wine, I'm always interested in the conformance
> testing. I believe it's crucial in speeding up Wines' development.
> For each bug found, it is often a good idea to write an automatic
> regression test.
Yes, although that's
Maybe one could script something up so that a commit to
tests CVS would not be *possible* without a confirmed test
pass on Windows 95, NT, 2000 and XP.
That'd be the best thing since sliced bread.
regards,
Jakob
Brian Vincent wrote:
PS - still looking for ideas for the agenda, if you have any, let me
know. Also let me know if you'd like to present something.
Will anyone demo CXtest? I think it would be great.
http://www.cxtest.org/
regards,
Jakob
Paul Millar wrote:
On Thursday 17 March 2005 10:33, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Apart from all of Wine, I'm always interested in the conformance
testing. I believe it's crucial in speeding up Wines' development.
For each bug found, it is often a good idea to write an automatic
regression test.
Ye
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:12:47 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
We only implement the first 4.
Some of those are only needed by Explorer/the shell though, I doubt it's
necessary to implement them to run the apps (unless you want to run
Explorer of course :)
Yes, probably, but
Brian Vincent wrote:
I
PS - still looking for ideas for the agenda, if you have any, let me
know. Also let me know if you'd like to present something.
Apart from all of Wine, I'm always interested in the conformance
testing. I believe it's crucial in speeding up Wines' development.
For each bug fo
Hi,
there are enough rooms left in the hotel. Please use "WineConf" as keyword.
See you in Stuttgart
Hans-Ulrich Schmid
Wirtschaftsförderung Region Stuttgart GmbH
Stuttgart Region Economic Development Corporation
FIR_st - Forum IT-Region Stuttgart
Friedrichstr. 10
70174 Stuttgart
www.first.re
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:59:09PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> I'd like to suggest to add the following janitorial projects for Wine:
>
> 1. Fix Wine to be compilable by a 64-bit compiler
> 2. Fix wrong assumptions in Wine about endianess.
I'd say go for it.
--
Dimi.
> The last patch I sent didn't have a full enough path to
> dlls/x11drv/clipboard.c
>
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:15 -0700, Ron Jensen wrote:
> > Stefan,
> >
> > You are smarter than me! I completely missed this function. I
believe
> > the error is because *visual is "0". I replaced vis
--- Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've noticed that STI.DLL uses the
> IStiDeviceControl
> > interface, which is defined by the STIUSD.H file I
> > haven't got (it might be part of the Windows DDK
> or
> > something). Any idea where to find it?
>
> I can't see any definition of I
Michael Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This should start allocating memory from below 0x4000, to windows
> processes after the area between 0x4000, to 0x8000, is full,
> right?
That would be nice, but unfortunately it's not what it does. Also even
if it worked it wouldn't help for
Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 16 March 2005 19:57, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > This is wrong, comments should have already been taken into account
> > when PARSER_string_substW is called. The right fix is to make
> > GenFormStrWithoutPlaceHolders16 properly split the line li
38 matches
Mail list logo
