Hi,
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 16:00, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Context is: app has a "send to recycle bin" option to delete photos.
> Doesn't work. Native shell32/shfolder fixes it. If anybody is up for
> what is probably an easy task, figure out why and fix it so c:\Recycled
> is used.
I've looked in to t
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 21:55, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 17:16 schrieb Paul Vriens:
> > mlang:
> > linked to missing export NTDLL.DLL:atoi
[...]
> > ole32:
> > linked to missing export NTDLL.DLL:atoi
> mlang.dll and ole32.dll can be linked against msvcrt.dll inste
Michael Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:38, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > The test fails for me:
> >
> > rsaenh.c:1383: Test failed: 0103
> > rsaenh.c:1391: Test failed: 0, 0103
>
> It doesn't fail for me on a clean .wine directory and a fresh wine cvs
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:00:10PM +, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Niceness Don. Of course, it'd rock more if this had worked out of the
> box. I expect we're missing some shell magic for the recycle bin.
> Wouldn't be hard to investigate but have a million other things to do so
> I'll CC this to wine-
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 17:16 schrieb Paul Vriens:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 16:59, Paul Millar wrote:
[snip]
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I've included wine-devel again as this must touch others as well.
>
> I wasn't able to run the shlwapi tests on my win98 box, by itself.
> Running this gives an error bo
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:24:39 +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I don't think you want that either, it won't really make things less
> confusing if you are adding extra heap calls. You may want to look
> into using RelayFromExclude instead.
Well, the key thing is that they occur before the trace.
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I realised the stack allocation might be a problem but only a while
> after I sent the patch. Here's another that uses the heap.
I don't think you want that either, it won't really make things less
confusing if you are adding extra heap calls. You may
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 15:34 -0500, Don Feliciano wrote:
> SUCCESS! Woo Hoo! You rock... now my wife can't tell me b*tch at me
> for ditching Windows. Thanks a ton.
Niceness Don. Of course, it'd rock more if this had worked out of the
box. I expect we're missing some shell magic for the recycle
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ChangeLog:
> Rearrange WINPROC_CallWndProc to give clearer tracing
>
> --- windows/winproc.c (revision 132)
> +++ windows/winproc.c (local)
> @@ -408,20 +408,25 @@ static LRESULT WINPROC_CallWndProc( WNDP
> {
> LRESULT retvalue;
> int iWndsLoc
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 16:57, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> In the first round winetest runs all the individual test
> executables to find out the names of subtests they contain.
> In case of a failure it obiously has no way to run those
> tests, so they are skipped. You have the freedom the run
>
> A Wine FAQ at the forefront of the appdb, or even linked to each
> application's overview page might be nice, too, for more general issues
> like the above comment-- an explanation of basic procedures such as
> exporting/importing registry entries, what common errors mean, like the
> "Warning: Th
>>> If I run winetest-200502091000-paul-mingw manually on my win98 box
>>> I get several messages "Can't parse subtests output of" for the
>>> following tests [...]
>>> just before the tests actually start.
In the first round winetest runs all the individual test
executables to find out the names
gt; Or just that
> > more tests are somehow not correct (in combination with mingw)?
>
> I've bundled the individual tests in:
> http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/winetest-bin-20050209.zip
> (its some 2.6MiB in size, though)
>
> I image you should be able
George Ginden wrote:
George Ginden ha scritto:
OK I'm trying to implement text alignment in the edit control.
Now, one question how do I know (in the EDIT_WM_NCCreate for example)
if the text alignment has been requested by the programmer ?
Nevermind, I've figured it out. Now I need to set the "c
Oh, that's mostly because I was lazy. I'm pretty sure the text says that "if
you are on windows95 you should install winsock2". I'm not sure how to detect
whether the user needs to install winsock2 or not by looking at dlls. I was
planning on adding detection of the windows version and using
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 13:38, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> The test fails for me:
>
> rsaenh.c:1383: Test failed: 0103
> rsaenh.c:1391: Test failed: 0, 0103
It doesn't fail for me on a clean .wine directory and a fresh wine cvs
install. I've attached a modified version of the patch
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:38:21PM +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Alex Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Changelog:
> > * configure.ac: Alex Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Handle host_cpu of x86_64 like other x86s.
>
> This will break the 64-bit build.
Unfortunately, the 64-bit
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Hello,
Changelog:
Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
More complete stubs for DuplicateTokenEx and NtAdjustPrivilegesToken.
I have an even more complete patch for this that implements the
necessary server calls. Alexandre, please don't apply.
Rob
Michael Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changelog:
> Implemented CPGetProvParam's PP_ENUMCONTAINERS parameter type
> Added corresponding test
> Removed some tabs that slipped in with the last patch
The test fails for me:
rsaenh.c:1383: Test failed: 0103
rsaenh.c:1391: Test failed: 0, 0
Alex Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changelog:
> * configure.ac: Alex Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handle host_cpu of x86_64 like other x86s.
This will break the 64-bit build.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 05:54, Paul Millar wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2005 22:14, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > the attached patch fixes the build problem for me.
>
> Thanks, Stefan, that seems to have fixed the problem.
>
> Test-build worked correctly, so the next "production" build cycle
> shou
Thanks again for your message.
Le lundi 07 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 01:16 +0100, Holly Bostick a Ãcrit :
> I had to go through 4 links just to get to the main application page.
> First, the sidebar link from the main site to the appdb front page. This
[FIXED] I sent a patch to replace "Applications" with
Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You shouldn't do that kind of preventive version check, you should
> > always call the function and then deal with failures appropriately.
>
> Sorry I am a little dense. If both functions are just n
23 matches
Mail list logo
