>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
> It appears that for whatever reason that call isn't implemented there. I
> did a clean install of Windows 98SE here from CD to make sure my install
> wasn't tainted and the test passes fine (save for the non existant
> Registry value). I have not done any updates thr
Paul Vriens wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 05:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
SPI_{GET,SET}ICONTITLEWRAP is not implemented on a standard Win98 SE.
Changelog
Check for availability of SPI_GETICONTITLEWRAP
Cheers,
Paul.
Hi Paul,
I agree we definately should not be leaving keys/values in use
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 22:28 +0100, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
> Le mardi 25 janvier 2005 à 21:13 +0100, Michael Drüing a écrit :
> > Here's something I noticed when I last wanted to find some info in the
> > AppDB. Browsing through the database is really well organized, but what I
> > find a bit confusi
Le mar 25/01/2005 Ã 20:03, Bill Medland a Ãcrit :
> On January 25, 2005 03:48 pm, Robert Shearman wrote:
> > Vincent Bïon wrote:
> > >Le mar 25/01/2005 ï11:51, Robert Shearman a ïrit :
> > >>+ * Copyright 2001 Ove KÃven, TransGaming Technologies
> > >
> > >Not sure we want UTF-8 in the source file
Le mar 25/01/2005 à 18:48, Robert Shearman a écrit :
> Vincent Béron wrote:
>
> >Le mar 25/01/2005 à 11:51, Robert Shearman a écrit :
> >
> >
> >>+ * Copyright 2001 Ove KÃ¥ven, TransGaming Technologies
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Not sure we want UTF-8 in the source files... At least we don't have it
On January 25, 2005 03:48 pm, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Vincent Bïon wrote:
> >Le mar 25/01/2005 ï11:51, Robert Shearman a ïrit :
> >>+ * Copyright 2001 Ove KÃven, TransGaming Technologies
> >
> >Not sure we want UTF-8 in the source files... At least we don't have it
> >(yet).
>
> I think it should
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:14:56PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> On January 25, 2005 08:03 am, Martin HEIN wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > I just upgraded to the most recent version of CrossOver Office 4.1
> > Professional, a nightly build as of January 25th, 2005, and wine
> > reports version 20050111.
>
Vincent Béron wrote:
Le mar 25/01/2005 à 11:51, Robert Shearman a écrit :
+ * Copyright 2001 Ove KÃ¥ven, TransGaming Technologies
Not sure we want UTF-8 in the source files... At least we don't have it
(yet).
I think it should be made policy that anything in the comments should be
UTF-
Le mar 25/01/2005 à 11:51, Robert Shearman a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> This time without alloca.
>
> Rob
>
> Changelog:
> Proxies/stubs for IRemUnknown methods, based on code written by Ove Kåven.
>
>
> diff -u -p -N -r -x '*~' -x '.#*' -x CVS -x Makefile -x '*.o' -x '*.spec.def'
> dlls/ole32_49
Bill Medland wrote:
On January 25, 2005 08:03 am, Martin HEIN wrote:
Bill,
I just upgraded to the most recent version of CrossOver Office 4.1
Professional, a nightly build as of January 25th, 2005, and wine
reports version 20050111.
(upgraded from Crossover Office 20040716)
So do the "trace
On January 25, 2005 08:03 am, Martin HEIN wrote:
> Bill,
>
> I just upgraded to the most recent version of CrossOver Office 4.1
> Professional, a nightly build as of January 25th, 2005, and wine
> reports version 20050111.
(upgraded from Crossover Office 20040716)
So do the "trace:odbc:." mess
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
[...]
"Rating with Windows" mean rating when using a real windows partition.
This rating might have good reasons to be here in the past (when most
apps needed many native dlls) but is now regarded as a bad feature by
some of AppDB hackers. Maybe some other
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 14:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:30:04 +0100
> From: Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Rein Klazes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Lionel Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>wine-devel@winehq.org
> Subject: Re: PerformanceC
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 11:19, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I resend it (resync from current cvs) as i haven't been commited yet
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raphael
> >
> > > Changelog:
> > > - VertexDeclaration device APIs
> > > - D3D9 declarations parsing
>
Le mardi 25 janvier 2005 Ã 21:13 +0100, Michael DrÃing a Ãcrit :
> Here's something I noticed when I last wanted to find some info in the
> AppDB. Browsing through the database is really well organized, but what I
> find a bit confusing was the "Rating with Windows" and "Rating without
> Windows" g
Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if the usage of the environment variable WINEDBEUG did not change you have to
> add the plus character between the equal sign and odbc in the export line to
> get the logging autput.
Actually the plus is optional.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROT
Am Dienstag, 25. Januar 2005 16:06 schrieb Bill Medland:
> On January 25, 2005 06:40 am, you wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > > You type, at the command line,
> > > export WINEDEBUG=odbc
> > > wine myprog.exe 2>odbc.log
[snip]
> Aha
> (There is still no indication that you are doing the WINEDEBUG;
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:30:04 +0100, you wrote:
> I'm quite certain that many programs use that function for extremely time
> critical code
> (games, anyone??), and that thus the Windows function is equally highly
> optimized,
> certainly much less slow than a gettimeofday() call.
> This should
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:24:48AM +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> If the appdb isn't good enough, we should fix it, not link to
> third party web sites.
Here's something I noticed when I last wanted to find some info in the
AppDB. Browsing through the database is really well organized, but what I
Hi,
If there are not objections I'll send the attached patch to
wine-patches.
Changelog
The Interlocked cleanup is completed.
Cheers,
Paul.
Index: templates/en/janitorial.template
===
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/templates/en
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:30:04 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> and that thus the Windows function is equally highly optimized,
> certainly much less slow than a gettimeofday() call.
These days gettimeofday() is very fast because the kernel vDSO system is
used to optimize the syscall overhead.
thanks -
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:44:04PM +0100, Rein Klazes wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:08:56 +0100, you wrote:
>
> > > How bad is it to use the gettimeofday() method?
> >
> > In my opinion, the RTDSC method should be suppressed from the code and we
> > should always use the 'gettimeofday' met
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:08:56 +0100, you wrote:
> > How bad is it to use the gettimeofday() method?
>
> In my opinion, the RTDSC method should be suppressed from the code and we
> should always use the 'gettimeofday' method (despite the penalty hit of a
> syscall).
I was more concerned about the
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Hey, you did it! Thanks very much!
As a side note, the shell32:shlfolder test leaves an empty
testdir directory around when run under XP. I tried to
trace it, but suddenly it ceased to do so... Does anybody
else experience this?
I have this pattern too.
Jakob
Hi,
just saw that our entry for the default user is .Default while on at
least win98SE,Win2K and WinXP it's .DEFAULT.
Not a big deal but should this be changed? The registry functions all
seem to be case-insensitive.
Cheers,
Paul.
On January 25, 2005 06:40 am, you wrote:
> Bill,
>
> To verify an ODBC connection from a Windows-based application I'm using
> 'odbct32w.exe' and 'odbcte32.exe', both from the Microsoft MDAC 2.8
> SDK. The former crashes (see attached log), the latter runs fine except
> it doesn't display my unixOD
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/gdi32:metafile.txt
>>
>> This fails. It shouldn't, because I ran winetest manually.
>>
>> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_Ja
Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been a bit busy lately so haven't gotten around to
> fixing it, but should have some spare time tonight,
> fingers crossed ;)
Hey, you did it! Thanks very much!
As a side note, the shell32:shlfolder test leaves an empty
testdir directory around whe
Hi,
now that the test results are current again :-) I can see why some of
the shreg tests failed before. The error we are getting back for
RegCreateKeyA is ERROR_CHILD_MUST_BE_VOLATILE on most of the XP boxes.
We need to either:
- Use a different key to write to (a non volatile parent)
- Use Reg
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:36:10AM +0100, Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> > From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> >
> > what is my incentive to do that?
>
> Ehm, perhaps because it's fun? There must be something with opensource that
> makes all those volunteers want to contribute.
yes - that and being p
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:52:08PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
>
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> >what is my incentive to do that?
>
> If you have no motivation to write patches on your own time, then you're
> unlikely to be hired, and unlikely to be listened much either.
until i h
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +memcpy(&cIids, buf, sizeof(USHORT));
> +buf += sizeof(USHORT);
> +ir = (REMINTERFACEREF*)buf;
> +pResults = alloca(cIids * sizeof(HRESULT));
You shouldn't use alloca, it's not portable, plus the space may not be
available since the ap
Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I resend it (resync from current cvs) as i haven't been commited yet
>
> Regards,
> Raphael
>
> >
> > Changelog:
> > - VertexDeclaration device APIs
> > - D3D9 declarations parsing
> > - a little better APIs (trying to avoid compil problems)
You forgo
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
what is my incentive to do that?
If you have no motivation to write patches on your own time, then you're
unlikely to be hired, and unlikely to be listened much either.
If you write the patches, get familiar with the code and what we're
trying to achieve then
> From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>
> what is my incentive to do that?
Ehm, perhaps because it's fun? There must be something with opensource that
makes all those volunteers want to contribute.
Were you asking for funding as many times on the samba mailing lists as on
the wine mailing lists?
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:29:03PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
>
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> >hi, in case you looked at the number of emails exchanged on FreeDCE
> >and freaked out, here's a summary. if you feel that there are any
> >relevant points missing or incorrect, please _do_
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 02:22, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 01:26 +0100, Raphael wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I resend it (resync from current cvs) as i haven't been commited yet
>
> Gosh I hope you don't get committed, it would be a shame to lose another
> Wine developer to insanity!
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 07:44, Paul Vriens wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 01:26, Raphael wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I resend it (resync from current cvs) as i haven't been commited yet
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raphael
> >
> > > Changelog:
> > > - VertexDeclaration device APIs
> > > - D3D9 declaratio
"Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/gdi32:metafile.txt
>
> This fails. It shouldn't, because I ran winetest manually.
>
> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/version.txt
>
>
> what's up with that?
Th
39 matches
Mail list logo
