Re: Best DLLs to write conformance tests for?

Dan Kegel wrote: That's a small enough list that I can start guessing at which ones are worth writing tests for. Let's see, how 'bout the following 12: amstreamatl cabinet crypt32 dplayx dpnet icmpimagehlpitss mswsock winaspi wsock32 Are any of those obvio

Re: [LOSTWAGES] Add regedit janitorial project

Michael Stefaniuc wrote: Regedit lacks a few features. We need to improve regedit to: * Allow display and editting of binary (REG_BINARY) values. * Allow display and editting of multi-string (REG_SZ_MULTI) values. * Import registry files regerated by Windows 2000 regedit Are you sure th

Best DLLs to write conformance tests for?

Recently, I helped a student at Harvey Mudd college write and submit a conformance test for the lzexpand dll: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2004/11/0164.html I picked lzexpand.dll since (lacking a GUI) it seemed simple to test. Now I'm putting together a reusable lab project for other co

Re: [LOSTWAGES] Add regedit janitorial project

Mike McCormack wrote: ChangeLog: * Add regedit janitorial project Janitorial Projects Any self respecting project has a Janitorial project (e.g. Kernel Janitor's List ), and it's high time

Re: dcom95.exe removed from sf.net

Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Jer tells me it's deleted now; anyone still pointing to SF > needs to update ASAP. Sorry to jump in late, but maybe the problem could be mitigated somewhat by putting a redirect at the old location which would automatically send users and scripts

Re: German language files

Thanks for the translations, however please read: http://www.winehq.org/site/sending_patches You should send patches, not zip files. Diff against the current WineHQ CVS, not ReactOS. Diff new files against /dev/null. eg. diff /dev/null dlls/shell32/shell32_De.rc Your changes are unlikely to be ac

Re: Janitorial : Use Compiler Warnings ( -Wmissing-declarations ) ( #1 )

Rémi Assailly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- include/wine/library.h2005-01-07 19:41:26.0 +0100 > +++ include/wine/library.h2005-01-07 19:49:41.389057824 +0100 > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ > extern void *wine_dlopen( const char *filename, int flag, char *error, int > errorsize ); > ext

Re: USER32: result of ScrollBar functions review (4th try)

Vitaly Lipatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > :( How I can send changes as separate patches if I do all fixes > in the same time? Really, I will try do as you tell me when it > is possible. > The patch we talk about has too few chances to be separated... It's pretty easy, just get a fresh copy

Re: Wine(server) priority inversion on CK kernel mailing list

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:20:46 -0600, Jeremy White wrote: > On my todo list is an item to start a conversation with > the Kernel guys about these scheduling differences, > and to see if we can ask for a few tuning hooks to help > us better match Windows. But I keep trying to goad > Alexandre into do

Re: Wine(server) priority inversion on CK kernel mailing list

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 13:25:00 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: >> I have been running photoshop under wine >> with 2.6.8.1-ck9 and 2.6.9 and it was good. >> Is there any workaround for 2.6.10-ckx and wine >> to get normal speed? We had great fun with wacko scheduling problems in CrossOver for iTunes and

Re: dcom95.exe removed from sf.net

Hi, On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:44:44PM +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote: > Hello, I replaced the sdk redistributable installer with the actualy > installer, as the licence > allows redistribution of the installer for end users only. It also makes > the installation easier. > The file contains a Micro

Re: Wine(server) priority inversion on CK kernel mailing list

These could just be the usual known slow wineserver communication effects at work here, but I wanted to make sure you know about these issues on the CK list. I suspect that the issue is much deeper than just the wineserver effects; Windows scheduling requirements are fundamentally different than th

Re: [winegcc] Include .so files when calling winebuild

Alexandre Julliard wrote: I'm not sure I follow you, if your .so files have been built correctly they shouldn't contain undefined references to Windows APIs. Could you please show an example of the situation that causes a problem? .so that are not compiled as dll or fake dll (fake dll is when th

Wine(server) priority inversion on CK kernel mailing list

Hi, I'm following CK kernel development, and the mailing list had the following posting: -- Message: 19 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:16:14 +1100 From: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ck] wine is bloody slow with 2.6.10-ck2 To: Michal ?erav?k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: CK Kernel <[