Re: UNICOWS: stub implementations

2004-12-28 Thread Stefan Leichter
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 16:22 schrieb Hans Leidekker: > On Tuesday 28 December 2004 15:30, Stefan Leichter wrote: > > you missed to send the implementations of the stubs! > > Well, yes and no. Our unicows doesn't have any implementations itself, it > just links to the dlls that do have them

Re: lotus notes regression

2004-12-28 Thread Paul R Streitman
Mike, Sorry about that, I edited away the notes level at some point! This is with notes 6.5.3. I can easily reproduce it if you would like me to try anything. Thanks, Pa

Re: another build problem on current cvs

2004-12-28 Thread Vincent Béron
Le mar 28/12/2004 à 09:24, Joris Huizer a écrit : > Hello, > > For the past week or so, building from cvs on a debian/stable system w/ > alsa installed (using a custom kernel Linux debian 2.4.18.041216) breaks > on alsa-specific code in wine; > I attached the log; note that I did a `cvs update -

Re: lotus notes regression

2004-12-28 Thread Mike Hearn
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:21:27 -0500, Paul R Streitman wrote: > Patch 14725, applied 2004/12/07 11:31:53, breaks lotus notes. The symptom > is a hang with the CPU at 100%, and it happens immediately if you try to > click on a notes 'bookmark', or shortly after you try to do much of > anything else i

lotus notes regression

2004-12-28 Thread Paul R Streitman
Patch 14725, applied 2004/12/07 11:31:53, breaks lotus notes. The symptom is a hang with the CPU at 100%, and it happens immediately if you try to click on a notes 'bookmark', or shortly after you try to do much of anything else if you try to avoid the 'bookmarks'. Sorry that it took me so long t

Re: Windows Admionistrator Rights

2004-12-28 Thread Mark Knecht
I see that the file .wine/user.reg has a line in it that reads "USERPROFILE"="c:\\Windows\\Profiles\\Administrator" but my Windows directory has no Profiles subdirectory in it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows $ ls -al total 40 drwxr-xr-x 9 mark users 4096 Dec 28 10:46 . drwxr-xr-x 4 mark users 4096

Re: Windows Admionistrator Rights

2004-12-28 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:46:58 -0800, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:39 PM -0800 Mark Knecht > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm guessing this means WIne is compiled on this machine in a way that > > doesn't output debug information? > > > >If so

Re: build problem on current cvs

2004-12-28 Thread Jacek Caban
Stefan Leichter wrote: Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 11:15 schrieb Jacek Caban: Hi. Stefan Leichter wrote: Hello, i hope you all had nice Christmas. Now back to business :-) trying to build current cvs (~7:45 AM UTC) i get the error: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/wine/wine-build/in

Re: Windows Admionistrator Rights

2004-12-28 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:39 PM -0800 Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm guessing this means WIne is compiled on this machine in a way that doesn't output debug information? If so (please let me know) then I'll have to look up how to compile to include this output. I installed

Re: Windows Admionistrator Rights

2004-12-28 Thread Mark Knecht
Kenneth, There are no messages when I run Wine like this: WINEDEBUG=+all wine setup.exe I'm guessing this means WIne is compiled on this machine in a way that doesn't output debug information? If so (please let me know) then I'll have to look up how to compile to include this output. - Ma

Re: Windows Admionistrator Rights

2004-12-28 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM -0800 Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How can I tell Wine to trick an install program into thinking the user has administrator rights under Windows XP? I've switched the windows type in the config file to winxp but the install program for Autocad 20

ptrace + Warcraft 3 issues remain (2.6.10)

2004-12-28 Thread Jesse Allen
Last I reported on Warcraft 3 with the ptrace changes in 2.6.10-rc3 is that it made some improvement, but still doesn't work. I'll will describe in detail what I know now. Since the changes in 2.6.10-rc3, Linus made a very good clean up of ptrace.c and signal.c in arch/i386/kernel. I don't want

Windows Admionistrator Rights

2004-12-28 Thread Mark Knecht
Hi - Sorry for cross posting to both winde-devel and wine-users but I need to try and get an answer today on this. I'm at my dad's house and using Wine on his computer. How can I tell Wine to trick an install program into thinking the user has administrator rights under Windows XP? I've switched t

Re: [OLE #16] Comment out an assert, as we don't yet implement IRemUnknown

2004-12-28 Thread Mike Hearn
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 13:28 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > It may look better in a comment, but it's easier to spot and grep for > if it's all uppercase. Also, if it's not often called, I think it's > better if we have it as a FIXME(); That's true, though it's not hard to find fixmes in this cod

Re: [OLE #16] Comment out an assert, as we don't yet implement IRemUnknown

2004-12-28 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:21:30PM +, Mike Hearn wrote: > Hmm? I'm not sure what you're saying, sorry. The lowercase fixmes just > look better inside a comment, IMHO, and there are so many that spamming > the user with debug chatter is silly: we already know that we have to fix > it :) It may

Re: [OLE #16] Comment out an assert, as we don't yet implement IRemUnknown

2004-12-28 Thread Mike Hearn
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:30:42 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > $ find|xargs grep FIXME|wc -l > 11011 > $ find|xargs grep fixme|wc -l > 83 > > Might be good to keep it that way... Hmm? I'm not sure what you're saying, sorry. The lowercase fixmes just look better inside a comment, IMHO, and there

Re: [AppDB] Get rid of value fillers in appSubmit.php for a new version

2004-12-28 Thread Chris Morgan
Ok, thanks Paul. Chris On Tuesday 28 December 2004 5:49 am, Paul van Schayck wrote: > Chris, > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:56:26 -0500, Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So is this patch good to go in? > > No disregard it. You applied the other appsubmit.php patch. The > changes in here

Re: [OLE #16] Comment out an assert, as we don't yet implement IRemUnknown

2004-12-28 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 03:37:17PM +, Mike Hearn wrote: > Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Comment out an assert, as we don't yet implement IRemUnknown > > --- dlls/ole32/stubmanager.c (revision 9) > +++ dlls/ole32/stubmanager.c (local) > @@ -171,8 +175,10 @@ int stub_manager_unref(stru

wine: could not load kernel32.dll, status c000007b

2004-12-28 Thread Serge S. Spiridonoff
Hi, I've compiled a Win32 GUI app under Linux using WineLib but it fails to start. Any ideas what's wrong with the program? [test]WINEDEBUG=+loaddll ./dlg1 trace:loaddll:load_dll Loaded module L"c:\\windows\\system\\msvcrt.dll" : builtin trace:loaddll:load_dll Loaded module L"c:\\windows\\system\

Re: UNICOWS: stub implementations

2004-12-28 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 15:30, Stefan Leichter wrote: > you missed to send the implementations of the stubs! Well, yes and no. Our unicows doesn't have any implementations itself, it just links to the dlls that do have them by creating dummy references. For those dlls I sent patches earlier,

another build problem on current cvs

2004-12-28 Thread Joris Huizer
Hello, For the past week or so, building from cvs on a debian/stable system w/ alsa installed (using a custom kernel Linux debian 2.4.18.041216) breaks on alsa-specific code in wine; I attached the log; note that I did a `cvs update -dPA` and `make distclean` so this can't be any problem with th

Re: UNICOWS: stub implementations

2004-12-28 Thread Stefan Leichter
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 13:16 schrieb Hans Leidekker: > This one removes most remaining spec file stubs from unicows. It depends > on my previous patches to winspool, kernel, user, gdi, rasapi and shell. > > -Hans > > Changelog: > Stub implementations for AddMonitorW, AddPortW, AddPrintPr

Re: MSI: free allocated buffers

2004-12-28 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Joris Huizer wrote: Mike McCormack wrote: ChangeLog: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * free allocated buffers The other daty I saw a lot of patches changing things like if (buffer) HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); To HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); Why are you adding new code with the if() st

Re: build problem on current cvs

2004-12-28 Thread Stefan Leichter
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 11:15 schrieb Jacek Caban: > Hi. > > Stefan Leichter wrote: > >Hello, > > > >i hope you all had nice Christmas. > > > >Now back to business :-) > > > >trying to build current cvs (~7:45 AM UTC) i get the error: > > > >make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/wine/wine-bu

Re: Unicodify System Metrics

2004-12-28 Thread Mike Hearn
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:26:36 -0500, jchevrier wrote: > --- sysparams.c.orig 2004-12-27 20:09:20.0 -0500 > +++ sysparams.c 2004-12-27 21:45:02.674627072 -0500 Hi, The patch looks OK at a first glance but in future please diff from the source root, preferably against CVS. thanks -mi

Re: [AppDB] naming convention

2004-12-28 Thread Jonathan Ernst
What type of conversion do we need if we don't use strings and integer as booleans but rather use if(isset($variable)) instead ? The only implicit conversion I see is when we do: echo "There are $iSomeInteger maintainers"; but that's not a problem I think. Le mardi 28 dÃcembre 2004 Ã 11:54 +010

Re: MSI: free allocated buffers

2004-12-28 Thread Mike McCormack
Joris Huizer wrote: The other daty I saw a lot of patches changing things like if (buffer) HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); To HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); Why are you adding new code with the if() statement in place again? Note all these patches were written by Aric, and I most

Re: [AppDB] naming convention

2004-12-28 Thread Paul van Schayck
Hey, On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:42:11 +0100, Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > constants will still be uppercase without prefix. > > Do someone object this ? If we really have to. And if you both think it's a good idea I'll use it. It's better than the original idea ($str_foo). And no one

Re: MSI: free allocated buffers

2004-12-28 Thread Joris Huizer
Mike McCormack wrote: ChangeLog: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * free allocated buffers The other daty I saw a lot of patches changing things like if (buffer) HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); To HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); Why are you adding new code with the if() statement in place aga

Re: [AppDB] Get rid of value fillers in appSubmit.php for a new version

2004-12-28 Thread Paul van Schayck
Chris, On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:56:26 -0500, Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is this patch good to go in? No disregard it. You applied the other appsubmit.php patch. The changes in here were included. Still we should rewrite the error handling to use those value fillers again. Paul

Re: build problem on current cvs

2004-12-28 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi. Stefan Leichter wrote: Hello, i hope you all had nice Christmas. Now back to business :-) trying to build current cvs (~7:45 AM UTC) i get the error: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/wine/wine-build/include' ../tools/widl/widl -I../../wine/include -I. -I../../wine/include -I../include

Re: free allocated buffers

2004-12-28 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Mike McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Index: dlls/msi/action.c > === > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/msi/action.c,v > retrieving revision 1.55 > diff -u -r1.55 action.c > --- dlls/msi/action.c 27 Dec 2004 19:12:35 - 1.55

build problem on current cvs

2004-12-28 Thread Stefan Leichter
Hello, i hope you all had nice Christmas. Now back to business :-) trying to build current cvs (~7:45 AM UTC) i get the error: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/wine/wine-build/include' ../tools/widl/widl -I../../wine/include -I. -I../../wine/include -I../include -h -H oaidl.h ../../