Grant Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) start notes whilst connected to home network. /etc/resolv.conf gets
> populated by home dhcp server
> b) start vpn connection to work /etc/resolv.conf gets populated with
> extra name servers
> c) try and connect to work notes, server fails, as it
> I know this sounds a bit unethical (maybe impolite would be a better word),
> but
> for practical reasons I think this is permittable. Or maybe I should
> specifically state (at wine-patches) that I "allow anyone else to fix the
> patch
> should it contain errors, and resubmit it"?
If you licen
> Ekush (http://www.ekush.com) published some binaries.
At time of writing the hoster has taken them down.
Ivan.
Libero ADSL: navighi gratis a 1.2 Mega, senza canone e costi di attivazione.
Abbonati subito su http://www.libero.it
Quoting Jeremy Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No this will not work. You need to keep the paths relative. Do not use
> full URLs as then if you have a development/test server running, it will
> take you back to the production site.
>
> If you look at index.php, there is an include("path.php"), whi
Hi,
is there a patch anywhere, which will allow wine to reread the
/etc/resolv.conf file.
i.e.
application lotus notes
a) start notes whilst connected to home network. /etc/resolv.conf gets
populated by home dhcp server
b) start vpn connection to work /etc/resolv.conf gets populated with
extra
Was there a problem with this one - Its really holding me up with progress,
so I need to ensure I resolve any issues asap.
Thanks
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Ann and Jason Edmeades [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2004 21:52
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [dx9-12 next try
Le mer 10/11/2004 à 10:45, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 04:47:15AM -0800, William Poetra Yoga H wrote:
> > I know this sounds a bit unethical (maybe impolite would be a better word),
> > but for practical reasons I think this is permittable. Or maybe I should
> > specifical
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 04:47:15AM -0800, William Poetra Yoga H wrote:
> I know this sounds a bit unethical (maybe impolite would be a better word),
> but for practical reasons I think this is permittable. Or maybe I should
> specifically state (at wine-patches) that I "allow anyone else to fix th
No this will not work. You need to keep the paths relative. Do not use
full URLs as then if you have a development/test server running, it will
take you back to the production site.
If you look at index.php, there is an include("path.php"), which defines
the static BASE. If you always inclide path
--- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Poetra Yoga H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Index: dlls/user/menu.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/user/menu.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.8
> > diff -u -r1
Hi,
In setupapi/setupx_main.c, function SETUPX_CreateStandardLDDs:
There is a FIXME("LDID_SRCPATH: what exactly do we have to do here ?\n").
It concerns the registry value:
SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Setup\\SourcePath.
AFAIK, this value defines the location where the setup o
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:16:06AM +0100, Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> > Ekush (http://www.ekush.com) published some binaries.
> > Surprise, surprise, it looks like ReactOS very much (Check
> > e.g. the radio buttons on the "Accept License" screen during
> > 2nd stage setup).
>
> This pisses me
I ran into the error
Oops, segment violation
while running make to build wine from cvs.
It failed on the command
../tools/widl/widl -I../../wine/include -I. -I../../wine/include -I../include
-h -H ocidl.h ../../wine/include/ocidl.idl
Turning on logging showed that it happened while processing
> From: Ge van Geldorp
>
> Ekush (http://www.ekush.com) published some binaries.
> Surprise, surprise, it looks like ReactOS very much (Check
> e.g. the radio buttons on the "Accept License" screen during
> 2nd stage setup).
> Some string searching in their binaries reveals:
>
> $ strings -a ve
14 matches
Mail list logo
