--- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And, is my second assumption correct, btw? I mean,
> > x = r.right - r.left + 1
> > y = r.bottom - r.top + 1
>
> I'm not sure what you mean, it seems you are trying to think too hard
> about it; just don't worry about doing +1/-1, that should
> The thing is that the old code wasn't entirely correct too.
> Here is a test case + fix.
Thanks a lot Dmitry, I got carried away with some other stuff.
--
Dimi.
I can't download the RH 20041019 packages either: "The mirror you've
selected, telia.dl.sourceforge.net does not currently have the file you
requested."
- Walter
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Bill Medland wrote:
> I am unable to download the RedHat 20041019 packages; any idea why? (Did they
> get buil
William Poetra Yoga H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, so:
>
> r.left = 10;
> r.top = 10;
> r.right = 60;
> r.bottom = 85;
> FillRect(hdc, &r, hbr);
>
>> > And for everything else when we have an x by y rectangle, we actually mean
>> > (x-1) by (y-1), is it OK to assume so? Am I correct?
>>
>
>
Hi Michael, some very brief feedback:
1. MD4, MD5, and SHA1 are now implemented in wine's
advapi32. Please use these instead of OpenSSL's.
2. The regression tests should be written so they
don't fail if OpenSSL isn't available.
3. Get rid of magic numbers: What do the values 0x36
and 0x5c mean i
--- Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Poetra Yoga H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Um... OK, so the correct code is to add 1 to the sides, right? I mean, to
> draw
> > the 50x75 rectangle we would do:
> >
> > r.left = 10;
> > r.top = 10;
> > r.right = 61;
> > r.bottom =
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +INT WINAPI WSAEnumProtocolsA( LPINT lpiProtocols, LPWSAPROTOCOL_INFOA lpBuffer,
> LPDWORD lpdwLength )
> +{
> + return WINSOCK_EnumProtocols( lpiProtocols, (WSAPROTOCOL_INFOW *)lpBuffer,
> lpdwLength, FALSE );
> +}
You cannot cast a WSAPROTOCOL_IN
Le lun 25/10/2004 à 13:57, Bill Medland a écrit :
> I am unable to download the RedHat 20041019 packages; any idea why? (Did they
> get built?)
>
> I can download a SuSE one (well, it at least asks me if I want to save it) but
> for all the Red Hat ones I've tried the mirror page keeps repeated
William Poetra Yoga H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Um... OK, so the correct code is to add 1 to the sides, right? I mean, to draw
> the 50x75 rectangle we would do:
>
> r.left = 10;
> r.top = 10;
> r.right = 61;
> r.bottom = 86;
>
> FillRect(hdc, &r, hbr);
>
> And for everything else when we have
Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do you feel it's reasonable just to turn on
>> ST_FIX_ALIGN, which *could* mask
>> errors both in wine and in the user's code?
>
> It may indeed. The masking problems in user code
> bothers me, though, since you're using winelib and you
> may not have a pr
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:38:01PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
>
> Hi Dimi,
>
> The following hunk of the patch below breaks the IE install. You should
> be able to press Alt-A to accept the license in the first dialog, but
> with this hunk applied it no longer works.
Thank you, I'll submit
I am unable to download the RedHat 20041019 packages; any idea why? (Did they
get built?)
I can download a SuSE one (well, it at least asks me if I want to save it) but
for all the Red Hat ones I've tried the mirror page keeps repeatedly coming
up and it never actually tries to download.
--
--- Eric Frias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did some more reading, and found there's a way to
> get the kernel to
> install a handler for unaligned accesses which will
> synthesize the unaligned
> access with two aligned accesses, and then jump back
> to the original point
> in the code.
Interes
Hello,
I've worked on an OpenSSL based implementation of rsaenh.dll in my spare time
over the last three months. Although it is by no means complete, I feel that
the coarse structure should be stable by now. The patch is appended to this
mail as a gzipped tape archive. I'm aware that small patc
Juan Lang a écrit :
> Yikes. That's a bad one. The trouble is MS loves
> this sort of return value. Even if the dll itself
> doesn't dereference an unaligned pointer, the caller
> might depending on how things are layed out. The
> trouble is i386 allows unaligned memory access, so we
> don't se
Hello... i am having problems installing program with MSI Installer. When i launch setup.exe, the
installer begin the process and when finish of copy files (progress bar is 100%), stay in endless
loop. I ran serveral programs using MSI installer but nothing, all hangs at end of copy files.
I test
--- Vincent Béron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're passing a struct by value. If you want the caller to have his
> structure to be modified, you need to pass it by ref.
>
> Vincent
>
No, I don't want the original structure to be modified. I want to return a
structure from the function, a st
--- "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is OK, the rect functions are consistent with the rest of the GUI
> functions
> (I would also add that not including the right and bottom borders is a good
> thing,
> but let's not debate that). Anyway, even if the standard APIs were awkward
James Hawkins wrote:
>> No, it will work. The cast probably there because the original author
>> didn't want to write two functions. Instead he added a bool to the
>> internal function that specifies whether the buffer is unicode or
>> not. The cast is then needed to keep the compiler happy.
>
>Th
Hi Dimi,
The following hunk of the patch below breaks the IE install. You should
be able to press Alt-A to accept the license in the first dialog, but
with this hunk applied it no longer works.
Mike
Index: wine/dlls/user/button.c
diff -u wine/dlls/user/button.c:1.2 wine/dlls/user/button.c:1.3
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
