On Thursday 02 September 2004 10:27 am, Juan Lang wrote:
> Greg, you still lurking around here?
Yes. But I am worthless atm due to being totally swamped in preparation for
going overseas to study. Unfortunately, I am not optimistic about how much
time I will have once I am a student... howeve
Jim White wrote:
> I think they were only converting the syscalls but I don't really
> remember Gav told me various stories of their Mac porting efforts
> at WineConf.
It would be interesting to chat with those folks indeed. I take it that
given that their product is dependent on Wine, wh
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:25:52AM -0700, Steven Edwards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The downside is that while OpenSSL is frequently going to not be
> > found
> > as it's the wrong version, GnuTLS is also not widely installed by
> > default so it might not get
On Friday 03 September 2004 17:40, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If your disassembly-fu is up to it, be my guest ... that doesn't solve
> > the problem of mysterious crashes for people using/compiling Wine
> > today though. So I'd still vote for a configu
Hi, i´m trying to access a MSSQL server (in a windows machine in the network) from a
Visual Basic Application running under wine, using an ODBC driver.
Since there aren´t any MSSQL drivers for linux i decided to use de native ones, so i
installed mdac_typ.exe . Then i configured the DSN using od
Hi, i´m trying to access a MSSQL server (in a windows machine in the network) from a
Visual Basic Application running under wine, using an ODBC driver.
Since there aren´t any MSSQL drivers for linux i decided to use de native ones, so i
installed mdac_typ.exe . Then i configured the DSN using odb
Chris Rankin a écrit :
--- Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HWND WINAPI GetConsoleWindow(VOID)
{
FIXME("stub\n");
return NULL;
}
no this returns the handle to the window (in USER32) which contains the
console. WHat you need is
So -- is there a unit testing or so or do all people just make a bunch
of extra files to make the function calls and make what they need compile?
If I change, say , dlls/winmm/mci.c: winmm: mciSendStringW , how will I
be able to verify the change didn't change the behavior of the function?
(rath
Hi,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - When I run winemaker in my project root directory, it runs
> successfully
> but in
> the end does not produce any configure script as said in the
> documentation
> but
> produces directly a Makefile
I build simple Winelib apps all the time. Try this
winema
Ok, I'll do some more research and see if I can come up with a better
solution.
Thanks,
/Ulrich
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Rein Klazes wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:28:31 -0400, you wrote:
>
> > ChangeLog:
> > Ulrich Czekalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Handle WM_BUT
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If your disassembly-fu is up to it, be my guest ... that doesn't solve
> the problem of mysterious crashes for people using/compiling Wine
> today though. So I'd still vote for a configure check.
You need to know what the bug is in order to write a proper
Mike Hearn wrote:
If you're just generally looking for things to do, W->A cleanup isn't
the only task. You could help extend the test suite :)
Or another possibility... since there is no longer a ~/.wine/config file
installed, we really, really need some serious work on winecfg. That
should be
Hi,
I have been trying to use Winelib to build a very trivial Windows Application
on
Unix just to test the working of winelib. But it does not work according
to the
documentation at all. Here are the problems I found:
- When I run winemaker in my project root directory, it runs successfully
but
Michael Buesch writes:
Quoting Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:07:18PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Audio runs as a separate thread outside of wine potentially through who
> knows how many layers as a combination of both process and kernel
> context so that's alrea
--- Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SetConsoleCursorInfo would do (if you're running the
> program under wineconsole).
/**
* GetConsoleWindow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
HWND WINAPI GetConsoleWindow(VOID)
{
FIXME
Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> Open Source is helping each other and if we just say 'oh well, it's easier
> for us to just remove the optimisation flag' and forget the issue, it's an
> opportunity lost to improve GCC.
We can report this to gcc developers, but, at least on my side, I don't know
enough how GC
> Heh, I always find it hard :)
Well, my example was on code generated for ARM which is unreadable when the
complier saves the frame pointer :-)
> If your disassembly-fu is up to it, be my guest ... that doesn't solve
> the problem of mysterious crashes for people using/compiling Wine today
> t
Hello,
im trying to run a program, but appear this error message:
Invoking /usr/lib/wine/wine.bin SVLGER.EXE ...
fixme:ole:CoRegisterMessageFilter stub
fixme:ole:GetRecordInfoFromGuids (0x40b8e0,2,12,0,0x40b8f0,0x4465e8),stub!
fixme:ole:CoRegisterMessageFilter stub
Wine exited with a successful st
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 01:18:42PM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Patrick Goupell wrote:
> [...]
> > Is there a repository where I can get some projects to test my changes to
> > winemaker?
>
> Here are a couple more ideas:
>
> * the Microsoft Platform SDK also comes wi
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Patrick Goupell wrote:
[...]
> Is there a repository where I can get some projects to test my changes to
> winemaker?
Here are a couple more ideas:
* the Microsoft Platform SDK also comes with a lot of samples that you
could use to exercise winemaker. However I didn't try the
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Patrick Goupell wrote:
[...]
> Is there a repository where I can get some projects to test my changes to
> winemaker?
What I've done in the past is grab the examples that come with Windows
programming books, typically the Petzolds.
Besides that you may try the open-source proje
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:28:31 -0400, you wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> Ulrich Czekalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handle WM_BUTTONDOWN operations before dragging test
> Don't eat WM_LBUTTONUP message
>
> Index: dlls/comctl32/listview.c
> ==
Well, I always found the resulting assembly of code compiled with
'-fomit-frame-pointer' much easier to read than without :-)
Heh, I always find it hard :)
Why not first try to search for the bug and report it to the GCC people ?
If your disassembly-fu is up to it, be my guest ... that doesn't solv
Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> Why not first try to search for the bug and report it to the GCC people ?
IMHO Wine has so much things to take care of that are more important than a
GCC bug that the better way to handle this for now is to filter off that
flag.
There're also other softwares which filter some
Mike Hearn wrote:
> Using this switch is almost always a bad idea, as it makes getting
> backtraces impossible. OK, without debug symbols, they are of only
> limited usefulness but I've still been able to track down problems
> before using a stripped backtrace.
I build quite everything in Gentoo wi
> -fomit-frame-pointer is one of those "optimizations" that does more harm
> than good in my opinion.
Well, I always found the resulting assembly of code compiled with
'-fomit-frame-pointer' much easier to read than without :-)
> If you are right and this is causing misbuilds, perhaps we should
So -- is there a unit testing or so or do all people just make a bunch
of extra files to make the function calls and make what they need compile?
If I change, say , dlls/winmm/mci.c: winmm: mciSendStringW , how will I
be able to verify the change didn't change the behavior of the function?
(rath
Seems like I found out which flags causes trouble with the scrollbars and
the mouse's scrollwheel: building wine without -fomit-frame-pointer flag
makes it work right.
Using this switch is almost always a bad idea, as it makes getting
backtraces impossible. OK, without debug symbols, they are of o
Well NSS has been stable for a long time and has a nice regression
suite from what I have read. I dont see why updating the browser would
break it.
I don't mean due to bugs in NSS, I'm sure they've done a great job. I
mean because the actual library location itself has moved, or can no
longer be
James Hawkins wrote:
However, I don't know how to make simple tests.. as I'd really need to
test wether the code I write works, and works properly :p
The best way to test the functionality of a certain api function
against windows is to read the msdn docs on that function. There are
certain easy
30 matches
Mail list logo
