Sanjay Connare wrote:
Hey All, I am proud and happy to announce the release of a new binary
labeled Darwine 20040820 DP. This binary is based upon the 20040813
wine release.
...
Thought I would post a follow-up as Sanjay neglected to include a link
to the new binary:
http://darwine.opendarwin.or
>Hence my confusion and my call for help.
The solution that comes in mind is write a test program and find out.
Ivan.
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> > So who's right? The platform SDK that says this is a cdecl function or
> > Wine's headers?
> If the SDK is wrong and is diffrent from the windows implementation, then
> programs calling that function will have
> problems bacause of imcompatible header
> So who's right? The platform SDK that says this is a cdecl function or
> Wine's headers?
If the SDK is wrong and is diffrent from the windows implementation, then
programs calling that function will have
problems bacause of imcompatible headers between the ones used to build windows
and the SDK o
Still looking in undocshell.h, I see we have:
BOOL WINAPI GetFileNameFromBrowse(
HWND hwndOwner,
LPSTR lpstrFile,
DWORD nMaxFile,
LPCSTR lpstrInitialDir,
LPCSTR lpstrDefExt,
LPCSTR lpstrFilter,
LPCSTR lpstrTitle);
But in the Platform SDK's
In the platform SDK's shlobj.h I find:
HANDLE _SHAllocShared(LPCVOID pvData, DWORD dwSize, DWORD dwDestinationProcessId);
Notice the lack of a WINAPI and the leading underscore. So this would
indicate a cdecl API. But in dlls/shell32/undocshell.h I see:
HANDLE WINAPI SHAllocShared(LPVOID pv, U
I just ran a test programming in windows to see how the registry is
changed by called CryptSetProviderEx with the CRYPT_DELETE_DEFAULT
flag. When the CRYPT_DELETE_DEFAULT flag is used, the Name value of
the Type XXX key is removed, but not the TypeName, which solves the
problem of not being able t
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I agree. In fact the patch actually decreases performance.
> Test: 10,000,000 calls to EnterCriticalSection & LeaveCriticalSection,
> simulating fast path on critical sections.
> Results:
> Win2k - 1000ms
> Wine w/ patch - 1346ms
> Wine w/o patch
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Has anyone got MS Project 2000 working in wine?
James
I tried it a couple times and get about 80%
into the install. It stops at the same spot each
time.
fixme:powermgnt:SetThreadExecutionState (0x0): stub, harmless.
fixme:ntdll:NtAdjustPrivilegesToken
(0x4c,0x
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Umm, this should go into a global header file, right?
The theory being that it would be useful at many more performance critical
Wine places...
But I have to admit that I don't know which header file
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Has anyone got MS Visio 2000 working with wine?
James
Yes.
Tom
Has anyone got MS Project 2000 working in wine?
James
Has anyone got MS Visio 2000 working with wine?
James
Jacek Caban escreveu:
But what about other languages, which nobody updates as you do?
I have one more question: where can I find this script? I see that
polish translation is far from complete and I thought I could work
aroun dit.
Thanks,
Jacek
Sorry for the delay. Atached is the patch to create
Forwarded Message
From: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: Threading issues? [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ck
Digest, Vol 3, Issue 16]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:39:21 +1000
Mailer: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/2004
> the program starts, but the difference between this and a regular
> non-static variable is that this static variable holds whatever value
> it contains
That wasnt very clear so I'll try to explain better. The bottom line
is that the value of the static variable is retained between repeated
fun
Tobias wrote:
> > +if (warned++ < 10 && lprgn != NULL)
Stefan wrote:
> for me this looks like
>
> if (0 < 10 && lprgn != NULL)
The variable 'warned' doesn't actually turn out to be zero all of the
time. It is a static variable, so it is initialized once to zero when
the program starts,
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. August 2004 18:37 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
> > +
> > HRESULT WINAPI Main_DirectDrawClipper_SetClipList(
> > -LPDIRECTDRAWCLIPPER iface,LPRGNDATA lprgn,DWORD pdwSize
> > +LPDIRECTDRAWCLIPPER iface,LPRGNDA
Am Freitag, 20. August 2004 18:37 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
> +
> HRESULT WINAPI Main_DirectDrawClipper_SetClipList(
> -LPDIRECTDRAWCLIPPER iface,LPRGNDATA lprgn,DWORD pdwSize
> +LPDIRECTDRAWCLIPPER iface,LPRGNDATA lprgn,DWORD pdwFlag
> ) {
> ICOM_THIS(IDirectDrawClipperImpl,iface);
19 matches
Mail list logo
