Re: Status of MSI

2004-07-11 Thread Tom
Mike McCormack wrote: Michael Stefaniuc wrote: how much of msi.dll do you think is now implemented? About 40%, I'd guess. Mike Nice, I plan to update the status pages in the next week or so. I'll change it to 40% and list both Aric and Mike as workers. Tom

Debugger bugs

2004-07-11 Thread Mike Hearn
Hi guys, I've got a few problems with various debuggers. Can anybody help? 1) gdb doesn't seem to catch signals to sent to Wine. In a crash, winedbg is invoked without gdb ever being aware of it. 2) winedbg can't locate files anymore, the paths seem to be stripped: 0x401cdb48 fixup_imports [loa

Re: Add a 16-bit pair DLL for TWAIN

2004-07-11 Thread Mike Hearn
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:35:07 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > nedump.exe or exedump.exe or so. Do you have copies of these programs? I've been unable to locate them. NE is a format that was current a decade ago, tools to work with it are rapidly becoming arcane. thanks -mike

Stack blowout in _w95_dump_dke

2004-07-11 Thread by way of Troy Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _w95_dump_dke has code in it that processes sibling keys in the registry recursively. This results in a stack blowout for large registries (in my case in the Software\CLASSES key). It's trivial to stop the stack blowing out by changing this not to be

call to unimplemented function secur32.dll.GetComputerObjectNameW

2004-07-11 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
I stuck at this while trying to install "Microsoft Visual C++ Express 2005 Beta" (large package for offline installation): trace:module:process_attach (L"secur32.dll",(nil)) - END fixme:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException call to unimplemented function secur32.dll.GetComputerObjectNameW trace:module:GetMod

Re: Status of MSI

2004-07-11 Thread Vincent Béron
Le sam 10/07/2004 à 14:15, Mike McCormack a écrit : > > Hi All, > > I've completed the merge of the work Aric and I have done to date on > MSI. Some programs that use and do not package the MSI installer may > start to work. We still have no implementation of msiexec.exe, so there > is still

Re: Status of MSI

2004-07-11 Thread Mike McCormack
Michael Stefaniuc wrote: how much of msi.dll do you think is now implemented? About 40%, I'd guess. Mike

Re: Status of MSI

2004-07-11 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Hi Mike, how much of msi.dll do you think is now implemented? For http://www.winehq.org/site/status_dlls bye michael On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:15:16PM -0500, Mike McCormack wrote: > I've completed the merge of the work Aric and I have done to date on > MSI. Some programs that use and

Re: Marshal bug

2004-07-11 Thread Mike Hearn
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:24:00 +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: > I don't think it is a good idea > to back the patch out of cvs as it slightly improves InstallShield. How does it improve InstallShield? I only started looking at IS stuff again after the patch went in, so I don't have anything to compar

Missing SHLWAPI function

2004-07-11 Thread Flameeyes
Hi, I was trying a small program wrote in Visual Basic by a friend of mine. A part from missing ActiveX he used to display data, it seems to work, but when it's closed, there's an unhandled exception, and there're some errors about SHLWAPI: err:module:import_dll No implementation for [EMAIL PROTEC