Re: !LOSTWAGES! site misc updates

2004-06-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 07:35:23PM +0200, Ivan wrote: > As in subject. Jeremy, please let me know if there's anything wrong in this patch. Do you really think we need to switch from American to English spelling? What if someone else is sending a patch to convert back to American? I think the spell

Chasing Galactic Civilizations Unhandled Exception

2004-06-25 Thread Mike Kost
After sucking it up and realizing I'd have to learn how to navigate winedbg, I started playing around with the Galactic Civilizations unhandled exception. Some documentation and a few trips through winedbg later, it appears that Gal Civ is throwing a divide-by-zero -- Fir

Re: problem with linkage of so under RHEL3

2004-06-25 Thread Bill Medland
On June 25, 2004 12:59 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So for future reference is there an easy way to see what functions a so > > provides that don't show up in nm? > > Try nm -D. Thanks. > > > Then I guess the question will be a matter of why the dlope

Re: FILE_GetNtStatus Converting errno 38 to STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL

2004-06-25 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It just means there was some information loss in converting error codes > internally inside Wine ... you'll have to look elsewhere to figure out > *why* it failed. There is a table of errno codes on MSDN you can use or > look in winerror.h to find out what

Re: problem with linkage of so under RHEL3

2004-06-25 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So for future reference is there an easy way to see what functions a so > provides that don't show up in nm? Try nm -D. > Then I guess the question will be a matter of why the dlopen doesn't see the > existing functions when underneath Wine. Just a w

Re: FILE_GetNtStatus Converting errno 38 to STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL

2004-06-25 Thread Mike Hearn
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:16:14 +0200, Jürgen Leibner wrote: > # fixme:ntdll:FILE_GetNtStatus Converting errno 38 to STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL It just means there was some information loss in converting error codes internally inside Wine ... you'll have to look elsewhere to figure out *why* it failed. Ther

Re: FW: FW: WM_NEXTDLGCTL changes the default button ID and does not rest ore default control identifier

2004-06-25 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Krishna Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alexandre, > Is these changes looks good? Do I have to submit this patch to > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ? Well, I'm not really happy with it, that whole bSetDefID thing is fairly ugly IMO. I'd really appreciate if you could write a regression test that illus

Re: problem with linkage of so under RHEL3

2004-06-25 Thread Bill Medland
On June 24, 2004 05:46 pm, Bill Medland wrote: > Guys > > Command line application opens a dll using LoadLibrary. > That Dll links to odbc > odbc uses unixODBC to link to the new Oracle 10g Beta ODBC client. > That client so access rather a lot of Oracle libraries > > Relocation error occurs > > /u

Scrollbars, an application bug or a wine regression ? (#2314)

2004-06-25 Thread Gabriele Giorgetti
Hello, I've noticed a problem with scrollbars in the latest Wine's release (20040615). With wine version 20040505 everything was just fine. I've attacched a zip file with two screenshots (pls. see wine BUG #2314 @ bugs.winehq.org ) the first one is the correct behavior of the app using wine 2004050

FILE_GetNtStatus Converting errno 38 to STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL

2004-06-25 Thread Jürgen Leibner
Hi there, i'm trying to install a Software for Schools using wine-20040505-SuSELinux90.i586.rpm. After launching wine as user with: # wine setup.exe i get this message: # fixme:ntdll:FILE_GetNtStatus Converting errno 38 to STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Is anybody out there, who is able to explain wh

Re: appdb dump

2004-06-25 Thread Jeremy Newman
This is getting to be a common request. I think what I am going to do is make a script that tars up the appdb every night and puts it up for download. The only table it will not dump will be the userdb, for privacy reasons. I'll email you all again when I have something whipped up. On Thu, 2004-06