On April 22, 2004 7:26 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> The OS version section is already indented, although that's
> optional an it's defined instead as a series of equations.
> The only other section, Test output is not indented, and
> that would go against my design principle, which is to have
> the t
On April 22, 2004 8:38 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Why not to put this into a resource instead? I implemented
> the URL option because I thought the permanent archive URL
> may not be known at build time; it's surely not the case now.
Yes, but it seems easier like this. We handle winetest sources,
> - They will build this David thing in 6 - 8 weeks
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. I wouldn't touch this thing
with a thirty foot pole.
Hey,
I've had no troubles with Wine and OpenGL while developing my 3d
modelling tool. I've used both Red Hat (8/9) and Mandrake (9.x). Keep in
mind you'll need to install the NVidia OpenGL drivers as the generic X
drivers suck for 3D. =D When coding with OpenGL/Wine you cannot
initialize OpenGL
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Winetest will have to support a new option
> -B
> This will add a new section to the report,
> just before the test results, called "Build Info".
Why not to put this into a resource instead? I implemented
the URL option
Hello All,
I am going to work on a project that will rely heavily on OpenGL and Wine.
I wanted to get some of your opinions on which Linux distribution has the
easiest setup and install for dealing with OpenGL and Wine.
I will make a fresh install of the best latest version and build on it.
did
FYI, here's a press release from these jokers on Yahoo! Finance Singapore:
http://sg.biz.yahoo.com/040421/15/3jnea.html
Interesting that their web site is referenced in the release, but no link is
provided.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW Feri, can we indent the body of our current sections?
The OS version section is already indented, although that's
optional an it's defined instead as a series of equations.
The only other section, Test output is not indented, and
that would go
> From: Mike McCormack
>
> My guess is that they're going to try implement the NT Native API
> (system calls using INT 2F(?)) in the Linux kernel, then
> install Windows
> 2000 on top. That would make them somewhat similar to Win4Lin.
I guess you'd need a Windows license then, and they say on
I have seen some mentions of work on DirectPlay. Who is currently
working on this, and what are the implementation plans?
I am mainly curious if it is planned to be network compatible with
the same programs running on Windows. There could be some drawback to
this, because the old versions of Di
My guess is that they're going to try implement the NT Native API
(system calls using INT 2F(?)) in the Linux kernel, then install Windows
2000 on top. That would make them somewhat similar to Win4Lin.
Mike
Rein Klazes wrote:
Hi,
Somehow, we are doing something far to complicated:
http://www
> - the will use same time converted to UTC
> so it will mosty be MMDD1000, but it may be
> different when daylight-savings is in effect
If we are always explicitly using EST, daylight savings will never
affect it (its always UTC-5) as when in daylight savings,
the timez
On April 22, 2004 04:46 pm, R.U. Deranged wrote:
> Incidentally I wonder how Bill Joy would feel about his words and name
> being misused as a virtual endorsement of this company in their
> marketing spiel.
Overjoyed would perhaps be the term.
BTW: The very second their "demo" hits the wires, the
I'd also like to respond, as if their BS actually needs to be taken seriously,
that I have personally never had a Win32 application under Wine crash my
Linux kernel, nor have I experienced a Blue Screen of Death while running an
application under Wine. For me, that pretty much negates the "marke
Rein Klazes wrote:
Hi,
Somehow, we are doing something far to complicated:
http://www.specopslabs.com/david.htm
Rein.
I must be not getting something. Am I the only one who sees this as a
contradiction? First they say:
However, unlike our competitors, SpecOpS Labs has identified the flaws
And the thrist and last installment:
SERVING (Brian)
---
What we need to support:
-- multiple publishers
-- multiple files for the same build for each publisher
-- various distribution policies
What we need to do:
-- maintain a pool of releases as described in my
previ
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 14:38 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> JACK runs on OS X (and is proving very popular there). It is written
> in strict ANSI C and attempts to be strictly POSIX compatible. There
> is an OSS-API driver enabling it to be used on Solaris (at least).
Bingo :) OK, so I originally thoug
Now for the second installment:
USING (Feri)
---
A. winetest
Winetest will have to support a new option
-B
This will add a new section to the report,
just before the test results, called "Build Info".
The body of this section will b
> From: Paul Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One way this could work is if the general format for the BUILD_ID is
> MMDDhhmm [ "-" [ "-" ] ...]
> where is any metadata keyword that must not include a "-"
Right, I have reached the exact same conclusion over lunch myself. So here is a fresh
>On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:06:22 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>> if the freedesktop people have any intent of avoiding a split between
>> the music world and the "desktop beep" world, JACK is the only viable
>> sound server. if they don't care about such a split, then neither do
>> most of us in the music
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:08:11 +0200, Rein Klazes wrote:
> Somehow, we are doing something far to complicated:
Yeah, we're actually solving the problem instead of scamming investors out
of their cash - or was I the only one who watched Hustle ?
Of course it's possible that they found some amazing w
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:52:05 -0400
Kevin Koltzau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And on
> http://www.specopslabs.com/market_competition4.htm
> They mention just taking all the previous
> open source windows compatibility projects and
> "incorporating the best features" of them all
>
> I wonder what
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:06:22 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> if the freedesktop people have any intent of avoiding a split between
> the music world and the "desktop beep" world, JACK is the only viable
> sound server. if they don't care about such a split, then neither do
> most of us in the music/pro-
Looking on
http://www.specopslabs.com/david_development.htm
it doesn't sound like they've done much other then come
up with a business model based on theoretical goals
And on
http://www.specopslabs.com/market_competition4.htm
They mention just taking all the previous
open source windows compatibil
On Thursday 22 April 2004 12:08 pm, Rein Klazes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Somehow, we are doing something far to complicated:
>
> http://www.specopslabs.com/david.htm
If you can pierce through all that marketing hype, it seems to indicate
they're using some code from the Wine project. I hope they're in co
Lionel Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this a VERY verbose Changelog or the new way to see the patch in the
> commit log :-) ?
No, it's just the dumb maintainer hitting the wrong key at the wrong
time...
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As it was written in the Book of "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A few more thoughts on the multiple publisher idea,
> and what we need to do on the server side.
>
> So, let's assume we have a number publishers out
> there. On server side we need to:
> 1. Maintain a pool of published w
All, I am tracking a problem where an install program with an exception
trying to access 0x memory. I have tracked the problem down to
files/drive.c in DRIVE_GetCurrentDirectory where dos_cwd contains 0 and
is used in
ret = strlenW(dos_cwd) + 3; /* length of WHOLE current directory */
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Same here (GCC 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1)). It appears
> that this compiler defaults to --malign-double. When I
> specify --mno-align-double the test succeeds.
> ===
>
> Alexandre, can we add this flag to our makefiles? If so,
> I can pro
Hi,
Somehow, we are doing something far to complicated:
http://www.specopslabs.com/david.htm
Rein.
--
Rein Klazes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brian,
A few more thoughts on the multiple publisher idea,
and what we need to do on the server side.
So, let's assume we have a number publishers out
there. On server side we need to:
1. Maintain a pool of published winetest.exe's
2. Implement policy to serve from that pool (on a poll eve
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 05:21:36PM -0500, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> ChangeSet ID: 12085
> CVSROOT: /opt/cvs-commit
> Module name: wine
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/04/21 17:21:36
>
> Modified files:
> include: winternl.h
>
> Log message:
> Mike McCorma
===
From: Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Saturday 27 March 2004 02:20, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> generated.c:542: Test failed: TYPE_ALIGNMENT(*(LPWIN32_STREAM_ID)0) == 8
> (expected 4) generated: 842 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure.
Simple question : is anyone working on
WSALookupServiceBegin() and WSALookupServiceNext() in winsock?
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http
34 matches
Mail list logo