Hi,
I think there is a defect in the handling of EM_UNDO message for single
line edit controls. If you go by what MSDN says this
message should always return TRUE. But in EDIT_EM_Undo method
(controls/edit.c) we are checking whether the style of
the edit control is Read Only and returning FALSE i
hello all... been stumped on this one for
about a week now... been on the wine-users list trying to get this worked
out, and mr. pfeifer was even nice enough to lend some advice that yeilded some
build progress, but it (wine) seems to hate the idea of running on my
puter... here's the inf
On April 20, 2004 5:32 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> kernel32:file leaves a temp file behind
> kernel32:pipe loops forever on Win9x/Me (not included in my
> version of winetest)
> oleaut32:vartest takes too long to complete
> user32:dialog tends to hose Win9x
>
On April 20, 2004 5:15 am, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> The behaviour is the same as if the test had crashed. The
> timeout is not marked in the output now, although the info
> is available in winetest.
If it's not a big deal, maybe we can mark them as "timeout"
instead of "fail", it will help us figur
On April 20, 2004 7:50 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> That sounds good. Can we also ditch the zero (0), since it doesn't add
> any information.
> Naturally, 0 tests failed if it is OK.
Well, I kinda like the 0.
--
Dimi.
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
First of all, the report on http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/
is VERY pretty.
Hmmm, I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all but... I would
suggest reusing the same green, orange and red colors (1) as on t
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
And then winetest.exe can no longer pop up little dialogs
everywhen there is a timeout, that would kind of defeat
the purpose of having a service in the first place...
Winetest's main purpose isn't harassing nice users with
p
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
For consistency. But it's time to come forward with
ideas about what and how to show in the summaries!
Summaries? I don't understand... which summaries of what?
Oh man... Read the main hea
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
For consistency. But it's time to come forward with ideas
about what and how to show in the summaries!
Summaries? I don't understand... which summaries of what?
regards,
Jakob
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in
Wine. Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it
get misrepresented in for instance the XP column?
Yes, it will get misrepresented as the emulated Windows
v
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in
Wine. Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it
get misrepresented in for instance the XP column?
Yes, it will get misrepresented as the emulated Windows
v
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Thanks everybody for helping us testing this thing! There
is more to come: a program running as a Windows service in
the background, downloading and running new versions of
winetest as they come out: WinRash! Watch this place! :)
And then winetest.exe can no longer pop up
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> For consistency. But it's time to come forward with
>> ideas about what and how to show in the summaries!
>
> Summaries? I don't understand... which summaries of what?
Oh man... Read the main headline on the page we are tal
On Sunday 18 April 2004 18:23, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This is weird one. The Winelib build of AbiWord exposes an off-by-one
> error. However, the Win32 build of AbiWord works perfectly (without
> this very problem) under Wine/ReactOS/Windows. AbiWord builds flawlessly
> under Winelib,
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>>Thanks everybody for helping us testing this thing! There
>>is more to come: a program running as a Windows service in
>>the background, downloading and running new versions of
>>winetest as they come out: WinRash! Watch this
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another thing, why is it a zero "0" on all the green
> rectangles? Looks kind of sad to me...
For consistency. But it's time to come forward with ideas
about what and how to show in the summaries!
--
Feri.
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
>
> First of all, the report on http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/
> is VERY pretty.
Hmmm, I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all but... I would
suggest reusing the same green, orange and red colors (1) as on the
status page:
http://w
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in
> Wine. Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it
> get misrepresented in for instance the XP column?
Yes, it will get misrepresented as the emulated Windows
version. We simply use
Henk Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>
>> Can you please run this .exe on your Windows box:
>> http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/wine/winetest.exe
>>
>> We are trying to test the winetest infrastructure.
>
> On my (dutch) Windows 98 SE Lite (see www.litepc.net)
> insta
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Can you please run this .exe on your Windows box:
> http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/wine/winetest.exe
>
> We are trying to test the winetest infrastructure.
On my (dutch) Windows 98 SE Lite (see www.litepc.net) install it needed
quite a lot of user interaction. In the
Another thing, why is it a zero "0" on all the green rectangles?
Looks kind of sad to me...
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
On http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/ the "next build" and "previous
build" buttons are broken. I get a error message, saying "You don't have
permission to access /site
First of all, the report on http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/
is VERY pretty.
Almost get misty eyed here. ;-)
Things are coming along very nicely.
Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in Wine.
Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it get misrepresented
i
> 5. the icon of "winetest.exe" has a dark background, is it on purpose ?
> (my video card is configured to 16 bits/pixel)
It looks here like the background is the 'inverse' colour (invert the
underlying colour) -- in the app's title bar it shows up as a pale yellow
background, but on the taskbar
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Mehmet YASAR wrote:
>
>> 5. the icon of "winetest.exe" has a dark background, is
>> it on purpose ? (my video card is configured to 16
>> bits/pixel)
>
> Hmmm. Feri?
That icon behaves pretty strange: it has a transparent
back
Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> 2. With the GUI, a shell is created (it should display
>>> debug traces ??) but I see only some weird caracters
>>> like "abcdf g" and one line : "tests/process.c: 6 tests
>>> executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.??"
>>
>> That's expected. Windows jus
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Mehmet YASAR wrote:
> Test run on Win2K sp4 (French)
>
> 1. I have a error with comctrl32_test.exe (it's seems to occur during
> extraction).
> Translated from french : "Can't find PDA_Search entry point in
> COMCTL32.DLL" (I have version 5.81.4916.400)
Yes, expected.
> 2
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Mehmet YASAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1. I have a error with comctrl32_test.exe
>
> That's probably due to my old MinGW, newer versions
> hopefully won't produce this. Can anybody confirm this?
You could try with the auto-built versions here:
2. With the GUI, a shell is created (it should display
debug traces ??) but I see only some weird caracters like
"abcdf g" and one line : "tests/process.c: 6 tests
executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.??"
That's expected. Windows just can't do without this. :(
I'd say it's part of kernel32 tes
Mehmet YASAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. I have a error with comctrl32_test.exe (it's seems to
> occur during extraction). Translated from french : "Can't
> find PDA_Search entry point in COMCTL32.DLL" (I have
> version 5.81.4916.400)
That's probably due to my old MinGW, newer versions
hope
> 4. Programme stops on "user32:input" (the progressbar is at about 90%)
Sorry, I made a mistake.
I thought tests stopped on "user32:input" whereas there were running.
After waiting I see a timeout error and a dialog box asking to send data
to server.
"Ivan Leo Murray-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/ the "next
> build" and "previous build" buttons are broken. I get a
> error message, saying "You don't have permission to access
> /site on this server."
Yes, that's intentional. :-) (ie. not imple
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:28PM +0200, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> As in subject.
> License: LGPL
* An initial set of registry entries.
The current Wine standard is to use the regedit tool against
- the 'winedefault.reg' file to generate a default registry.
+ the 'wi
On http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/ the "next build" and "previous
build" buttons are broken. I get a error message, saying "You don't have
permission to access /site on this server."
Ivan.
Test run on Win2K sp4 (French)
1. I have a error with comctrl32_test.exe (it's seems to occur during
extraction).
Translated from french : "Can't find PDA_Search entry point in
COMCTL32.DLL" (I have version 5.81.4916.400)
2. With the GUI, a shell is created (it should display debug traces ??)
Krzysztof Foltman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Felipe W Damasio (Elipse Software) wrote:
>
>> PS: Did your patch got applied on mainline wine? I didn't
>> find any response to your post on wine-patches.
>
> Not yet. I hope it gets reviewed soon, but it seems
> Dimitrie is busy with winetest right
Just tried this on win98, XP and Win2k3
On win98 it totally locks my system up on user32:dialog
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 01:01 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Can you please run this .exe on your Windows box:
> http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/wine/winetest.exe
>
> We are trying to tes
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:11:04 -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
As such, I would like to have a "Weekly testing update" posted
to in the News section, with stuff like: how many tests were
added, how many failed/successed, etc. since last week. Maybe
a list of DLLs where changes we
Felipe W Damasio (Elipse Software) wrote:
My recent patch seems to fix that, as well as some other issues:
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/04/0320.html
Fixed it indeed.
Nice to hear that :-)
PS: Did your patch got applied on mainline wine? I didn't find any
response to your
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
But since you have not agreed to any license, you are free to personally
use your download however you wish.
Thanks to the new EU laws on copyright (Not the patent one, this is another
thing), this will soon change.
Hope is the last thing to die, but I am afra
Hi Krzysztof,
Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
My recent patch seems to fix that, as well as some other issues:
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/04/0320.html
Fixed it indeed.
Thanks a lot.
Felipe
PS: Did your patch got applied on mainline wine? I didn't find any
response to your p
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a forcing reason to have oldstdout initialized to
> -1 besides playing safe? Not that I object it, just want to
> avoid grave errors in the future.
No reason at all, it's just to avoid a compiler warning.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Good plan but I'd rather they were mailed to wine-devel. The news section
> on the website is more for end users.
Of course, the two are not mutually exclusive. I wanted it in the
News to keep it fresh in the minds of everybody, and hopefully to
attract ne
Folks,
Can you please run this .exe on your Windows box:
http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/wine/winetest.exe
We are trying to test the winetest infrastructure.
TIA!
--
Dimi.
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> winetest.exe from
>
> http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/
>
> works fine for me in Windows XP, but where is the stuff uploaded?
>
> "test.winehq.org", ok fine, but where is the info going?
Look into:
http://test.winehq.org/dat
Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
Just playing with ideas, but I thought that the Wine sub-system might
offer a great feature for this in that applications could not do
anything even if they were to "Break" Out" as they would be going
through a translation layer just like the Window applications but
winetest.exe from
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/
works fine for me in Windows XP, but where is the stuff uploaded?
"test.winehq.org", ok fine, but where is the info going?
regards,
Jakob
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:11:04 -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> As such, I would like to have a "Weekly testing update" posted
> to in the News section, with stuff like: how many tests were
> added, how many failed/successed, etc. since last week. Maybe
> a list of DLLs where changes were observed, a
Looks good, I will go ahead and put this in.
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 20:12, Chris Morgan wrote:
> * appsubmit.php, admin/adminAppQueue.php, tables/appdb_tables.sql
> Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It would be nice to know when entries to the appdb were submitted.
>
> Jeremy, you'll want to run
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 07:14, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
> 2.) What is the main differences between the WineX and Wine
> developments? Which is more stable?
I think we may need to put a page at winehq.org for this since it is a FAQ,
shortly wine project are:
wine - the open source thats the base
> But since you have not agreed to any license, you are free to personally
> use your download however you wish.
Thanks to the new EU laws on copyright (Not the patent one, this is another
thing), this will soon change.
Ivan.
OK,
So assume we get the show rolling, tests will run on various boxes,
results will be send back to WineHQ, nice colorful pages will be
generated, and a beautiful index page will put all these together,
being linked from the Status (http://www.winehq.org/site/status) page.
Are we done? I think n
Lonnie Cumberland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1.) Is wine thread save and can I run many instances
> without problems?
Yes. Your wine processes will belong to the same virtual
Windows by default.
> Also, can multiple users be running multiple instances
> without major degrades in system perfo
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On April 19, 2004 6:27 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> - force a 2-minute timeout on individual tests.
>
> Nice. I hope it's not too short. Does dissect & gather
> correctly recognize (and reflect on the HTML page) these
> timeouts? I'd be nice (and imp
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ChangeSet ID: 12069
> CVSROOT: /opt/cvs-commit
> Module name: wine
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/04/19 23:00:07
>
> Log message:
> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Change to console mode so that winetest runs un
On Monday 19 April 2004 23:28, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > 'make crosstest' would be more valuable if we didn't have to
> > build all of Wine first and this is the only thing blocking that.
>
> Ah, I see. But actually you don't need to build all of Wine for
> crosstests, a simple 'make tools' s
> Message du 20/04/04 02:54> De : Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> A : Christian Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Copie à : [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Objet : Re: [D3D8] Some vertex shaders fixes> Christian Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes:> > > + if ( !RegOpenKeyA( HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, "Software\\Wine\\d
56 matches
Mail list logo
