On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 10:58:44 +0200
Lionel Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you should just have to loop over all the rectangles and do the
> 'copy_on_screen' as many times as there are rectangles.
>
> Of course, if they overlap, this method will still work except that we would
> 're-Blit' som
On April 5, 2004 05:38 pm, Juan Lang wrote:
> I'd be rather nervous about the mixing of OpenSSL with
> the use of Winsock, at least as is. OpenSSL is itself
> using socket read/write calls, and it expects them to
> be the correct ones: in particular, the UNIX ones.
>
> I believe the only way to d
Hans wrote:
> On Monday 05 April 2004 19:24, Alexandre Julliard
> wrote:
> > There's no real reason that we cannot use Unix
> > sockets on Unix and Windows socket on Reactos with
> > the same code, it just needs a bit of header
magic;
> > and this will be useful for Winelib apps too.
>
> Hmm, I'd
Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> when a debugging thread is attached to several processes, the debug
> context (shared across all processes) is destroyed when the first
> process terminates. This patch destroys it when the last process
> attached terminates.
It seems to me this will caus
On Monday 05 April 2004 19:24, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> There's no real reason that we cannot use Unix sockets on Unix and
> Windows socket on Reactos with the same code, it just needs a bit of
> header magic; and this will be useful for Winelib apps too.
Hmm, I'd like to agree with that.
> Y
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, is this a problem? Depends on what's important to you, but I'd
> argue that it's more important for Wine to open up wininet (and
> consequently winsock) to more users and developers. That may eventually
> attract more developers to fix bugs or even
Hi,
I hope that we use Han's patch. It's going to make it easier to
implement thread safety (as we can use WaitForMultipleObjects on the
handles) and will make porting easier for Reactos.
IMO, wininet is not really performance critical, and we can probably
improve things in the winsock layer a
On April 5, 2004 1:57 pm, Mike McCormack wrote:
> IMO, wininet is not really performance critical, and we can probably
> improve things in the winsock layer a bit too.
I second that. Moreover, it seems that it's not that much of a performance
hit (as experienced by the user, 4.1s vs. 4.2s), but ra
>
> Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE?? If no mayby someone
> can give me some clues how to start... I am not bad i C++ I think, but I
> have never make thing like that. I don't promise I will do that, but I
> can try... :)
It depends on which part you are trying to implement.
For
Hi,
On April 5, 2004 10:57 am, "Jacek [KRunch] ChaÅupka" wrote:
> Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE??
I know that Juan Lang has already been making inroads into this.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/
Jacek wrote:
> Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE??
> If no mayby someone can give me some clues how to
> start... I am not bad i C++ I think, but I
> have never make thing like that. I don't promise I
> will do that, but I can try... :)
Hi Jacek, take a look at Wine's rsabase.dll
Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE?? If no mayby someone
can give me some clues how to start... I am not bad i C++ I think, but I
have never make thing like that. I don't promise I will do that, but I
can try... :)
On Monday 05 April 2004 05:21, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > Use #ifdef stuff so that when building on WINE, it uses unix sockets.
>
> We have to be smart about this, having #ifdefs all over the file
> is not acceptable. But from the look of the patch that was just
> posted, it certainly looks like
Quoting hatky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> No, no, no... read the patch again.
> Ok, sorry wasn't what I tought you are trying to do, this patch is ok
> p.s. I didn't think someone actually changed the urls in bugzilla. sweet :).
I have been going through them 100 at a time. I've got 1-400 done at t
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 21:01:06 +1000, Robert Lunnon wrote:
> BTW Has anyone experience with the Skype application under linux, does it work
> there ?
At one point it ran but I couldn't test whether it actually worked or not
as my soundcard doesn't work nicely in Wine. It is now apparently
protected
> No, no, no... read the patch again.
Ok, sorry wasn't what I tought you are trying to do, this patch is ok
p.s. I didn't think someone actually changed the urls in bugzilla. sweet :).
--
Hatky,
Worshiper of wine (http://www.winehq.org/),
Impossible is only an opinion.
What is the status of NtPulseEvent it emits a diagnostic messages
fixme:ntdll:NtPulseEvent (7c,0) yet it looks to me that NtPulseEvent is
implemented but the fixme is bogus
Anyone know about this ?
BTW Has anyone experience with the Skype application under linux, does it work
there ?
Bob
b
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Right. We need to support that case, but it seems that we need a way
to include stuff in the generated Makefiles. So, instead of adding all
these options, maybe we can find a way to simply allow the user to
include stuff in the generated Makefile. Something simple, like:
wi
"Santosh Siddheshwar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. Would you be able to share details of the changes you did for
> handling MDI windows?
The patch is here: http://cvs.winehq.com/patch.py?id=10783
I think that (almost) all that needs to be done about the problem is to move
most of the D
19 matches
Mail list logo
