On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:58:21AM +0100, Christoph Frick wrote:
hi,
im terribly sorry and hope this patch is not yet submited.
> - changed the mapping of the axis to a simplier formula, that ignores
> the middle of an axis
this code lacked the "shifting" of the result by ``wanted min''
also
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On March 23, 2004 2:46 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Probably in the version I was working on, when this fix was done, There
was something Screwy with the exceptions and the kernel code did not
catch them. But now it does and returns a proper error.
But if that's the case
On March 23, 2004 2:46 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Probably in the version I was working on, when this fix was done, There
> was something Screwy with the exceptions and the kernel code did not
> catch them. But now it does and returns a proper error.
But if that's the case, why is the test marked a
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> Excellent! Nitpicking, but could we publish winetest-MMDD0400.exe,
> UPX-packed? :-)
> As small as zip and no unpacking needed.
Sorry, just noticed your reply.
I've no particular preference for .zip or .exe; we can go with whichever
is easiest.
> "Stefan" == Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Hello Uwe, i fear your test will only test what you like to test
Stefan> if it is executed in the source directory. For "out of tree
Stefan> builds" your test case tests how LoadImageA behaves when the
Stefan> sp
Hello Uwe,
i fear your test will only test what you like to test if it is executed in the
source directory. For "out of tree builds" your test case tests how
LoadImageA behaves when the specified file does not exist.
Bye Stefan
Am Dienstag, 23. März 2004 21:29 schrieb Uwe Bonnes:
> > "C" =
"C. Daniel Mojoli B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 7) We hit L513 and cause an exception when executing the following
> expression: bits->idEntries[i]. The problem is that we are looping
> with our index bound to the garbage number of icon entries! That
> garbage is almost assured to be too large
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If Alxandre wants to do this, sure let's do it, but personally I
> don't want to burden him with the borring task of corking the
> commits every day. It adds borring, repetitive work jsut for
> saving a few hours of latency which I don't think ar
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > The rest is just a matter of agreeing what to put where and how to
> > register new binaries.
[Sorry, I was just meaning this was perhaps drifting OT for wine-devel]
> I thought Brian told you already how we're going to do this.
Yes I was told, bu
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
"C" == C Daniel Mojoli B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
C> Add minimal parameter validation to function
C> CURSORICON_SimulateLoadingFromResourceW(...). We check that the icon
Providing a test case for such special behaviour is a good idea...
I created this pat
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Paul Millar wrote:
> Hi Dimi,
>
> I guess we have to agree to disagree on this one. I still think that
> synchronous message-passing in distributed systems is a recipe for
> disaster (asynchronous is the only way to go). So schedule me a "told you
> so" email a few months a
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> If Alxandre wants to do this, sure let's do it, but personally I
> don't want to burden him with the borring task of corking the
> commits every day. It adds borring, repetitive work jsut for
> saving a few hours of latency which I don't think are a
Hi Dimi,
I guess we have to agree to disagree on this one. I still think that
synchronous message-passing in distributed systems is a recipe for
disaster (asynchronous is the only way to go). So schedule me a "told you
so" email a few months after the winetest.exe goes live ;^)
OK, so what I'll
ChangeLog
Dimitrie O. Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't adjust the extension for DLLs.
Index: tools/winegcc/winegcc.c
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/wine/tools/winegcc/winegcc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.21 winegcc.c
--- t
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> Is it not possible, somehow, for Alexandre to indicate when he has
> finished a run of commits?
If Alxandre wants to do this, sure let's do it, but personally I
don't want to burden him with the borring task of corking the
commits every day. It adds b
Excuse the late jumping in, but ...
On March 22, 2004 06:50 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> As for the issue of nighly build vs. randomly initiated build: we can
> argue till the cows come home. It seems that we have different points
> of view. If you want to have CVS-triggered builds for WRT, all t
> "C" == C Daniel Mojoli B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
C> Add minimal parameter validation to function
C> CURSORICON_SimulateLoadingFromResourceW(...). We check that the icon
Providing a test case for such special behaviour is a good idea...
--
Uwe Bonnes[EMAIL PROTEC
17 matches
Mail list logo
