Martin Fuchs wrote:
I see you found and could solve the problem.
If I understand correctly, this says, this part of IE installation uses PIDLs,
which are illegal in some way?
Is this the normal behaviour or only result of for example some
mis-convifured registry entries?
Actually, I added the ERR(
Hello,
> > This patch broke the installation of IE6.
> >
> > When running the command below during installation of IE6, a pathname is
> > scribbled over the stack...
> >
> > C:\windows\inf\unregmp2.exe /Shortcuts /IE5 /RegExts
> >
> > Any ideas why?
I see you found and could solve the problem
On February 7, 2004 04:32 pm, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> When I get a chance, I am going to write a quick script to put the man
> page up on the website as well.
Cool. While you're at it, make sure we can export all of our man
pages, we have a few already, with 3 more on their way...
--
Dimi.
This patch broke the installation of IE6.
When running the command below during installation of IE6, a pathname is
scribbled over the stack...
C:\windows\inf\unregmp2.exe /Shortcuts /IE5 /RegExts
Any ideas why?
Mike
Martin Fuchs wrote:
This patch is based on work of Ge van Geldorp <[EMAIL PRO
When I get a chance, I am going to write a quick script to put the man
page up on the website as well.
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 13:22, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On February 7, 2004 12:40 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > The canonical list is in the wine developer guide on WineHQ (well
> > actually it's the
Well, its probably related to URLMON.. I noticed that when I registered
that DLL sites that i put as trusted sites were giving me the green
checkmark in the status bar, but they were still giving me security
errors.. someone who is more familiar with urlmon's security manager
might know...
Med
Is there any fix for that ActiveX behavior on IE concerning security
settings to high, which aren't actually?
- Original Message -
From: "Abdul-Haseeb Ahmad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: IE6 Security Controls/URLMon;m
disregard these emails. the problem was due to a call to
DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Fade. I commented this out and now no
problems :) Only problem now is getting D3D to work
Abdul-Haseeb Ahmad wrote:
sorry, heres the error output that i get when urlmon is registered:
=>0 0x7800d14b (MSVCRT.DLL.
On February 7, 2004 12:38 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Not quite true. A few of us read wine-bugs and pull off patches
> occasionally, but there are no guarantees.
I know :) But it's better if people know that the only reliable
way of having a patch applied to the tree is to submit it to
the right foru
On February 7, 2004 12:40 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> The canonical list is in the wine developer guide on WineHQ (well
> actually it's the code).
In fact, I'd rather get rid of it from there as well. If anything,
it's easier (and more useful) to maintain it in the man page rather
then the guide.
--
sorry, heres the error output that i get when urlmon is registered:
=>0 0x7800d14b (MSVCRT.DLL._set_sbh_threshold+0x25f in MSVCRT.DLL)
(ebp=4084c100)
1 0x7800cc1c ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@@UBEPBDXZ+0x121 in
MSVCRT.DLL) (ebp=4084c144)
2 0x7800578c ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@Z+0x9 in MSVCRT.DLL) (ebp=4084c18c)
Okay when i use IE6 (installed by mike's script) any webpage that uses
an activex control says my security settings are too high, even if i
lower them (both custom settings and the slider have no effect), or even
if i make the site a trusted website... now i believe this might be what
be causin
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:19:34 +0100, cedric wrote:
> Hi, recently i upgraded from 20031118 to 20040121. I noticed a lot of bugfixes
> and speed increases. Thanks!
>
> However, i don't like the new man.1 page as much as i did the one from
> 20031118. The section about what debug channels wine has
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 00:27:51 +0100, cedric wrote:
> However, after each run of winedbg i have 4 more of these:
> 1797 pts/000:00:01 wine-kthread
Yeah, I don't think we've got the forking of the [kp]thread second stage
working right. There are messages from the kernel about wine being a buggy
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 01:06:50 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On February 6, 2004 12:26 am, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi wrote:
>> I'm new to the developers list. I have a question about patches in
>> bugzilla. Do developers usually read the bug reports to check for
>> patches? Or is it better to send
Eric,
I happily confirm that with your updates of elf.c, FreeBSD 4.x now
compiles that code without problems.
Thanks for your quick and effective response and the patch!
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
crossposted to wine-dev, and wine-users
Hi, I've done some more tests, and i found that when i run winedbg starcraft
and wine starcraft and then again winedbg starcraft etc. It works, but always
following this pattern:
winedbg starcraft :all runs perfectly
wine starcraft: all video cho
"Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log message:
> Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Use Win32 instead of Unix file functions.
> - Process files fully in Unicode.
> - Add Unicode file detection.
Profile test suite fails after this patch. Please either fix
or revert the patch.
On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 14:49, Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi Uwe, in NT the native (system call) interface is
> through ntdll. There are a number of subsystems
> implemented on top of that: the win32 subsystem, the
> posix subsystem, and the OS/2 subsystem. It's
> possible however to write an app that jus
Geoffrey wrote:
Sorry about the confusion...
1. I do not know if wineboot handles RunOnceEx\\Setup, I have no need
for any such programs anymore. IE uses its own utility for this.
2. Wineboot does not register the DLLs, because Steam gave "Could not
connect ..." errors without the R
20 matches
Mail list logo
