Le ven 16/01/2004 à 01:23, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
> On January 16, 2004 01:06 am, Mike McCormack wrote:
> > Since some people have been complaining that MSHTML is a useless
> > distraction in it's current form (there's some element of truth in
> > that), here's a small patch to redirect calls t
On January 16, 2004 01:06 am, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Since some people have been complaining that MSHTML is a useless
> distraction in it's current form (there's some element of truth in
> that), here's a small patch to redirect calls to Mozilla's Active X
> control. You need to add a "mshtml"="b
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I hit Google and found a page describing how to reduce flickering in
> FrontPage by writing a utility VB app using LockWindowUpdate and
> FindWindow, so clearly my initial implementation was wrong and this does
> need server support. The resultant code is a
"Ivan Leo Murray-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are win3.1 printer driver still supported by wine?
No, that code has been removed since it is incompatible with a 32-bit
GDI.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexandre:
>
> Do I understand your last sentence right?
>
> server/device.c should disapear?
Yes, it's a temporary hack. Devices should be normal file handles.
Eric's file management patch is going to take care of that I believe.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[
"Duane Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the window titled "Array1", if I double click one of those blue
> rectangles, another window should pop up (showing the contents of the
> blue rectangle). The window does pop up; it is the one labelled "Block".
> But it comes up "minimized" (sort of
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Duane Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With Xilinx fpga editor, I see one problem. When I double click one of
the blue squares in the array window, a block window shows up. But with
the patch, it is showing up sort of minimized, as shown.
Thanks for the testing. But
"Duane Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With Xilinx fpga editor, I see one problem. When I double click one of
> the blue squares in the array window, a block window shows up. But with
> the patch, it is showing up sort of minimized, as shown.
Thanks for the testing. But what do you mean by
Hello,
the attached patch fixes a problem when loading DOS exe files which have
4 bytes on the last page of the executable. There is no comment in the
code and i googled and couldn't find any reason or hint why having 4
bytes on the last page is special and why we should than load the full
512 byt
So, I saw in WWN mention of this website which I stumbled across by
accident a few weeks ago, and had another look. I couldn't believe how
useful it was, yet nobody seemed to use it and it's not a part of WineHQ.
A few questions, therefore:
1) Firstly, to Paul - could you hook things up so that w
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Hello all,
here is a result of my work aimed to merge MDI child creation
with common window creation code. The rewrite allows MDI children
to have WS_EX_MDICHILD style set on WM_CREATE and therefore properly
get lParam from MDICREATESTRUCT. MDICREATESTRUCT is now gets A<->W
Are win3.1 printer driver still supported by wine?
Ivan.
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> appended patch opens the devicefile connected to a drive as connected
>> by the user in ~/.wine/config [Drive X] "Device" = "/dev/yyy". The
>> appropriate actio
Hi,
>Running the oleaut32 tests shows that vartype and vartest are
>failing.
>Has someone an idea about these ?
Your (presumably early) version of oleaut32.dll doesn't support the
VT_DECIMAL type. I'll update the tests shortly.
Cheers,
Jon
=
"Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to
On Friday 16 January 2004 04:16, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is true, but it is not very time consuming. I had considered
> > caching the cpuid results which would eliminate the multiple handling but
> > didn't feel it was worth the effort. This f
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 15:23, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Robert van Herk wrote:
>
> > We (me and cmorgan) were thinking about dropping that tabsheet :-)...
>
> That's a good idea, the current UI for app-specific settings is terrible.
I agree it is horrible, but I wanted to try
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Robert van Herk wrote:
> We (me and cmorgan) were thinking about dropping that tabsheet :-)...
That's a good idea, the current UI for app-specific settings is terrible.
--
Dimi.
Hi...
I understand that you changed something about the app-specific tab-sheet?
We (me and cmorgan) were thinking about dropping that tabsheet :-)...
So I am not sure to what extend your changed are useful in the long term...
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:43:33 -0500, Kirk Ruff wrote:
> I forgot about that and I had wondered what those functions were, well
> now I know. I will try to make it work with that later today if I have
> some free time.
Yeah. In order to implement unlimited undo you need to operate in terms of
transa
Hi there:
I met with one problem. I try to send a simulated keystroke to another application (such as Notepad) to invoke one of its functions, but when I minimize the window of "Notepad", the message cannot be received even I used the SetFocus() and SetActiveWindow() function. When it is maximize
Hi all,
I'm getting this message over and over while attempting an update from the
wine cvs repository: "cvs server: [13:31:41] waiting for wineowner's lock
in /home/wine/wine" I'm guessing a CVS process has died and left a stale
lock in the repository. Could someone check it out?
Hello,
I am unsubscribing from wine-devel since I am no longer actively doing
any wine development work. However, if any question arise about the
patches I submitted recently, please feel free to email me.
Good luck and have fun at wineconf!
Jeremy Shaw.
Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After DLL separation is complete, adding these will no
> longer be necessary, right?
Well, it's really winapi_check that needs to be made smarter. 99% of
the contents of that file are redundant already and could be
determined automatically.
--
Alexan
Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is true, but it is not very time consuming. I had considered caching the
> cpuid results which would eliminate the multiple handling but didn't feel it
> was worth the effort. This function does not tend to get called often in
> windows programs
(sent this to the wrong email address, sorry)
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 07:08, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Why do you explicitly null terminate this string? It shouldn't be needed,
> right?
Not sure what the deal was but I was getting segfaults unless I null
terminated it myself. Now, it doesn't, so must have
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:36:17 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Just a long shot. I had a problem with my own program. where I would
> crush on a bug as so:
>
> in the code at global scope I had:
>
> SomeStruct table[] = {
> {1,2,3,4}
> {1,2,3,4}
> .
> {1,2,3,4}
> } ;
> // Note tha
Patches
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/01/0201.html
and
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/01/0202.html
fix the problem.
Ivan.
On Thursday 15 January 2004 16:07, Vincent BÃron wrote:
> Changelog:
> Yet another new spec file added to winapi_check/modules.dat, this time
> iccvid.spec.
After DLL separation is complete, adding these will no
longer be necessary, right?
-Hans
Hello guys.
I got CS running quite playable with and without Steam but with Steam
mouse movement gets dropped sometimes (the sensitivity feels much lower).
I experimented a bit and found out that this problem happens whenever
Wine is running more than just hl.exe (e.g. CS + Winamp).
In case th
Some good words for a happy user...
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Congratulations with your wine product.
Date: January 15, 2004 09:28 am
From: Pascal Pype <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello maintainers and developers of wine,
The performance and configuartion
Mike Hearn wrote:
IIRC keeper makes only one or two API calls before crashing, both of those
calls are trivial and succeed (setting a timer or something I think) so
it's more likely to be to do with the layout of an in memory struct or
something. Remember that the TEB is stored in %fs, if you se
After a cvs update, there is this lovely build error, while building gdi, is it
a problem with the recent gdi patches that have just got in or am I doing
something wrong?
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ivan/Development/Wine/CVS/wine/dlls/gdi'
../../tools/winebuild/winebuild -D__WINESRC__ -D_GD
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:00:32 +0100, Frank Schruefer wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I like to learn how to fix wine problems myself and am trying to track down an
> exception
> occuring while starting good old 'Dungeon Keeper'.
Good luck! Please don't be discouraged if you can't crack this one though,
bo
Yo,
The patch looks good except for this bit.
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:20:44 -0500, Kirk Ruff wrote:
> +sprintf(key, WINE_KEY_ROOT "\\AppDefaults\\%s\0", currentApp);
Why do you explicitly null terminate this string? It shouldn't be needed,
right?
> +return_if_fail(
> + RegDeleteKey(H
"Rein Klazes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [?? Probable Spam]
>
> Your spam filter needs to be educated about wine-devel ;-)
That's not my spam filter (it behaves differently), some host in
e-mail chain marks every e-mail from you on this list with that
addition in the subject line.
> > Appar
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:20:28 +0800, you wrote:
[?? Probable Spam]
Your spam filter needs to be educated about wine-devel ;-)
> >
> > Is there any reason why in this case MultiByteToWideChar should not do
> > w = c + 0xf000 ?
>
> Wine is using the following source for its Symbol to unicode m
"Rein Klazes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wine's implementation of MultiByteToWideChar() does something quite
> complicated based on standard unicode tables and returns Unicode
> characters in all kind of ranges.
>
> The loop above is basically what Win2K's charmap.exe does. Of course it
> does
Hi,
Trying to fix a problem with Win2K's charmap.exe, I have a question for
the unicode experts.
If I convert character code's 32 to 255 using codepage SYMBOL on a Win2K
system, like in this snippet:
char c;WCHAR w;
for( c = 32; c; c++)
MultiByteToWideChar(CP_SYMBOL,0,&c,1,&w,1);
I get that
38 matches
Mail list logo
