Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 9, 2003 12:43 am, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > On the contrary. I said that, except for Dimi (who doesn't like > attachments), everyone WERE interested. I was interested as well, it's just that I prefer inline patches rather than text/plain attachments. But if Alexandre likes attachments

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Geoff Thorpe wrote: On December 8, 2003 03:58 pm, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Lionel Ulmer wrote: 2) or even better, write a re-tabulator which produce source code following THE RULES (tool that would be applied to all source code on each commit). So it's certainly possible to have it working :

Re: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS

2003-12-08 Thread Gregory M. Turner
On Monday 08 December 2003 06:21 pm, Steven Edwards wrote: > http://cvs.reactos.com/cvsweb.cgi/reactos/ntoskrnl/lpc/ Neat. Does it work well enough in ROS to support NT's native rpcrt4? -- gmt "It is to be the assent and ratification of the several States, derived from the supreme authority in

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On December 8, 2003 03:58 pm, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Lionel Ulmer wrote: > > 2) or even better, write a re-tabulator which produce source code > > following THE RULES (tool that would be applied to all source code on > > each commit). > > > >So it's certainly possible to have it working :-) > > >

Re: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS

2003-12-08 Thread Steven Edwards
Hey Greg, --- "Gregory M. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wine doesn't have LPC per se. If ReactOS does, I'd love to see their > > implementation and talk to you all about stealing it :) http://cvs.reactos.com/cvsweb.cgi/reactos/ntoskrnl/lpc/ > Uhh... so in answer to your question, rpcrt4

Re: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS

2003-12-08 Thread Gregory M. Turner
On Monday 08 December 2003 04:44 pm, Casper Hornstrup wrote: > > -Oprindelig meddelelse- > > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Steven Edwards > > Sendt: 8. december 2003 23:05 > > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Emne: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS > > > >

Re: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS

2003-12-08 Thread Casper Hornstrup
> -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Steven Edwards > Sendt: 8. december 2003 23:05 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS > > > Hello, > Ok I know this going to start YALD (Yet Another Long > Discu

Re: Status of winealsa patch

2003-12-08 Thread Christian Costa
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On December 8, 2003 04:38 pm, Christian Costa wrote: Well, I will have soon some Wave In stuff to submit. Should I wait alsa 1.0 support is added? No need to wait, as Alexandre pointed out already, our code should compile with alsa 1.0. Ok. Fine. Thanks Christia

rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS

2003-12-08 Thread Steven Edwards
Hello, Ok I know this going to start YALD (Yet Another Long Discussion) that wont go anywhere right away but.. ReactOS is getting ready to do a major import of the WINE dlls as you guys know due to my repeated cross-postings to Wine-devel and ros-kernel. When we compile rpcrt and ole32 from WI

Re: Status of winealsa patch

2003-12-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 8, 2003 04:38 pm, Christian Costa wrote: > Well, I will have soon some Wave In stuff to submit. > Should I wait alsa 1.0 support is added? No need to wait, as Alexandre pointed out already, our code should compile with alsa 1.0. -- Dimi.

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Steven Edwards
--- Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And that was a non-controversial change (well, Dimi objected, IIRC. > Like > I said). There was a perl script that Patrik wrote the do the conversion of the whole Winehq source tree. We should really just run this script once a year or something. A

Re: Issues in typelib.c with installshield 7

2003-12-08 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:39:54AM +, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > > > e.g. in ITypeInfo_fnGetIDsOfNames, I have changed it to > > > if(This->TypeAttr.cImplTypes && > > >(This->TypeAttr.typekind==TKIND_INTERFACE || > > > This->TypeAttr.typekind==TKIND_DISPATCH)) { > > > > Do you ha

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Lionel Ulmer wrote: but this is still not feasible because a lot of people touch the code, and even the same person touches it using different editors, from different boxes, etc. How are you going to make sure everyone has their editors setup just so (if at all possible!)? Face it, there's no way

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Lionel Ulmer
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:30:57PM -0800, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > If I have to enforce a rule, the rule will be: no tabs allowed > whatsoever. So be careful what you wish for ;-) Well, this would really be the best solution I think. At 'real' work we have a no-TAB rule and it's the only real

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Lionel Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Of course we can : we have a nice quality gate called 'Alexandre' which > commits all the patches. So we just need to, either : > > 1) write a tool that checks the source code for correct tabbing and rejects > the patch if it does not follow THE RULE

Re: Status of winealsa patch

2003-12-08 Thread Christian Costa
Sylvain Petreolle wrote: Hi, My winalsa patch for alsa 1.0 support wasnt commited and there wasnt any feedback fo it. Another winealsa patch was commited after that, should I resubmit mine ? References : http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/11/0342.html http://www.winehq.org/hypermai

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 8, 2003 02:52 pm, Lionel Ulmer wrote: > 1) write a tool that checks the source code for correct tabbing and > rejects the patch if it does not follow THE RULES Again, not feasible -- I for one edit wine stuff from multiple boxes, multiple editors, I don't want to have to learn how to

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Lionel Ulmer
> but this is still not feasible because a lot of people touch the code, > and even the same person touches it using different editors, from different > boxes, etc. How are you going to make sure everyone has their editors > setup just so (if at all possible!)? Face it, there's no way it can > wor

Re: Question about libwine_unicode functions and others in WINE

2003-12-08 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe we should come up with a bit more obvious names that > are (1) easier to see are temporary and (2) easier to grep. > Maybe a wl_/wstr_/wine_ prefix of sorts? But then you'd need to rename all the existing uses of wine/unicode.h functions too.

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 8, 2003 01:09 pm, Lionel Ulmer wrote: > Just to flame a bit (the lists were a bit quiet lately) : the only sane way > to dealing with TABs is when TABs are used properly (ie by an editor that > uses them only to go to the current C indenting level and uses spaces for > everything that c

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

2003-12-08 Thread Lionel Ulmer
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:03:00AM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > Only whitespace changes. Unfortunately, the formatting was > all messed up by having tabs of 4 and 8 chars (I said it > before, and I'll say it again: the only sane way of dealing > with tabs is to always use the standard size of 8

Re: Problem with Access-mdb/DAO

2003-12-08 Thread Fabian Cenedese
>I have posted this problem already long time ago but I never found the >time to test it again. > >http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/11/1530.html > >But now I tried with the actual wine from cvs (2003-12-03) and it's still >there. The problem is that if I try to create a table in a A

Re: Issues in typelib.c with installshield 7

2003-12-08 Thread Andrew de Quincey
> > e.g. in ITypeInfo_fnGetIDsOfNames, I have changed it to > > if(This->TypeAttr.cImplTypes && > >(This->TypeAttr.typekind==TKIND_INTERFACE || > > This->TypeAttr.typekind==TKIND_DISPATCH)) { > > Do you have a sample installer for download? Bah, I can't find one thats (a) available ea