Andreas Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1844: Point Size in DLG_TEMPLATE may be negative (with DS_SETFONT)
>
> Within Windows the pointSize parameter (for the FONT in the DLG_TEMPLATE
> struct) may be a signed 16-bit integer. With WINE this integers get's
> converted to an unsigned int r
Actually I think the code would work better like this:-
if ((msg.message >= WM_MOUSEFIRST) && (msg.message <= WM_MOUSELAST))
{
mt.pt.x = (short)LOWORD(msg.lParam);
mt.pt.y = (short)HIWORD(msg.lParam);
ClientToScreen(msg.hwnd,&mt.pt);
-Original Message-
Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that I have IDA nearly sorted, I was wondering.. who maintains the
> imagehlp dll? It seems kinda empty, and I'm sure it was at one point more
> complete (I looked into wine some time ago).
No, it has always been fairly empty, and nobody has b
Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IDA *is* changing what has been captured. If I add a
> MENU_SetCapture(hwndOwner); just after the WM_INITMENUPOPUP is sent, this
> fixes the problem. Is this an acceptable solution?
That depends on what Windows does. This will probably require wri
On Friday 05 December 2003 00:16, Mike Jackson wrote:
> Actually I think the code would work better like this:-
>
> if ((msg.message >= WM_MOUSEFIRST) && (msg.message <= WM_MOUSELAST))
> {
> mt.pt.x = (short)LOWORD(msg.lParam);
> mt.pt.y = (short)HIWORD(msg.lParam);
>
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
[...]
> As a second thought, using CreateDirectory seems shaky for
> me. Doesn't it depend on /tmp (or whatever tempnam()
> prefers) being accessible as a configured DOS drive?
Or maybe it's the use of tempnam() that is shaky on Windows. Why not use
GetTem
Hi,
so we should start working out this one, too. First let me
sketch the present picture. I've got a directory structure
like this: |
+ 20030829 + 95
| + 95_michael
| + 98
| + 98_joel
| + 98_kevin
Now that I have IDA nearly sorted, I was wondering.. who maintains the
imagehlp dll? It seems kinda empty, and I'm sure it was at one point more
complete (I looked into wine some time ago).
I ask this because about a year or so ago I got about 3/4 of the way through
reverse engineering the Wind
On Thursday 04 December 2003 23:34, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, I'll keep looking. I've printed out the coordinates I get in the
> > tracking loop. As soon as the popup menu is displayed, they are
> > immediately "off" by the position of the men
Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, I'll keep looking. I've printed out the coordinates I get in the tracking
> loop. As soon as the popup menu is displayed, they are immediately "off" by
> the position of the menu on the top of the screen. Its fine on menus without
> popups.
P
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's a mingw bug, their handling of atexit is not
> compatible with the way Windows does it.
I hope they know about it and will fix...
As a second thought, using CreateDirectory seems shaky for
me. Doesn't it depend on /tmp (or whatever tempnam
On Thursday 04 December 2003 22:59, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem is that MSG.lParam is NOT necessarily in screen coordinates
> > (even though the comment I have removed says they are). As I can't trust
> > the MSG.pt either, this means us
Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that MSG.lParam is NOT necessarily in screen coordinates (even
> though the comment I have removed says they are). As I can't trust the MSG.pt
> either, this means using GetCursorPos() to determine the mouse position in
> screen coo
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I add this as a janitorial task?
I guess so, though I'm not sure how we should proceed. Maybe the first
step would be to get rid of the lstr* calls, and then to add them back
in a second step once every place has been checked.
--
Alexandre
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But we've got an error in the cross-configured tree:
>
> tba:/usr/local/src/wine/pe/dlls/msvcrt/tests/ $ make
> i586-mingw32msvc-gcc cpp.o file.o heap.o scanf.o testlist.o -o msvcrt_test.exe
> -L../../../dlls -lmsvcrt -L../../../libs/wine -lwine -L..
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This has missed the last two commits. Is this codes presence in shell32
> really a blocking issue? If so then I'd note that quite a lot of people
> have problems caused by the lack of this patch (can't quit apps etc).
That's why it needs to be fixed proper
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This too missed the last couple of commits. Did I get the style stuff
> wrong?
Yes, but I'll fix that. BTW if you are going to repost the whole
patch, at least send a real patch, not a quoted version (and please
send it to wine-patches).
--
Alexandre Jul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le Wednesday 03 December 2003 13:12, Lars Segerlund a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I don't know how far along the directX9 support in wine is, and I am
> having trouble getting a game to run to which there is a downloadable demo
> (http://www.gamershell.c
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Andreas Rosenberg
> Sent: 04 December 2003 18:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Status of InstallShield-Setup Engine
>
> Hi!
Hi!
> I'm new to this list. The company I'm working for, is developing
> so
On November 30, 2003 06:32 pm, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> I just posted a patch to the reactos list that gets whatever comctl32.dll
> reactos has building with -Wall -Werror. But I dont have a WINE tree or any
> way to "port" these fixes over to WINEHQ. Can someone do it for me?
Steven, can you plea
On December 2, 2003 03:40 am, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> Great. I have a few more patches at http://212.242.245.122/patches/.
> Maybe you can review them?
It's better to post them on the list. More people get to see them,
they get indexed by various search engines, and they get archived
for posteri
On December 2, 2003 02:25 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Yes, this is something I've been wanting to do for a long time. Not so
> much because of libwine_unicode, but because a lot of places use the
> lstr* functions for no reason, and this slows things down quite a
> bit. The problem is that some
> "Andreas" == Andreas Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> Hi! I'm new to this list. The company I'm working for, is
Andreas> developing software for Windows and as a personal Linux fan I
Andreas> was testing our software with Wine from time to time. The last
Andrea
:-D
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
There will be no further parts, sorry.
Feri.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is suprise.
Suprise and fear. Fear and suprise. Are TWO weapons are fear, suprise,
and ruthless eficiency.
On December 4, 2003 11:47 am, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> First of all, thank you very much for adapting and putting
> this into the tree! Losing some of the automation is not a
> problem as we seldom have new modules to test.
Indeed, it looks very nice.
Now Feri, let's try to integrate your CGI scri
> -Original Message-
> From: Boaz Harrosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 December 2003 19:20
> To: Robert Shearman
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Status : Multimedia section
>
> Dear Robert
> I meant to drop you a note, ask what is the status. But you bit me
On December 4, 2003 01:20 pm, Andreas Rosenberg wrote:
> I'm new to this list. The company I'm working for, is developing
> software for Windows and as a personal Linux fan I was testing
> our software with Wine from time to time. The last tries (several
> month ago) were still pretting bad, but wi
Hi!
I'm new to this list. The company I'm working for, is developing
software for Windows and as a personal Linux fan I was testing
our software with Wine from time to time. The last tries (several
month ago) were still pretting bad, but with the Wine from Suse 9.0
(snapshot from August 2003)
ther
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Added files:
> programs/winetest: winetest.h util.c send.c maketest main.c
> Makefile.in .cvsignore
First of all, thank you very much for adapting and putting
this into the tree! Losing some of the automation is not
Hi,
tor, 2003-12-04 kl. 08:01 skrev Sylvain Petreolle:
> What audio backend are you using ?
I'm using OSS, I would believe this is standard, right?
Greetings,
--Thomas
_
My worst enemy gave me a copy of Windows...
Hi,
Recently Wine CVS has started always matching "System" to "Bitstream
Vera Mono", and nothing I alter in the config file can seem to change
it. This is kind of annoying as it's not a very good match, I'd rather
it used Vera Sans, is there a way to override Wines choice?
thanks -mike
Hi Alexandre,
This too missed the last couple of commits. Did I get the style stuff
wrong?
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 00:40, Mike Hearn wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> Map (WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW & WS_CAPTION) to _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_UTILITY.
> This makes Delphi a bit easier to use, as floating palettes aren't
> unman
Hi Alexandre,
This has missed the last two commits. Is this codes presence in shell32
really a blocking issue? If so then I'd note that quite a lot of people
have problems caused by the lack of this patch (can't quit apps etc).
thanks -mike
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:16, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> But now I tried with the actual wine from cvs (2003-12-03) and it's still
>> there. The problem is that if I try to create a table in a Access database
>> the last char of the name gets lost. I now have a small program which
>> shows this error, maybe someone can use it for finding this bug.
>>
What audio backend are you using ?
Directx audio capture has been implemented, but some audio backends
havent it at the moment.
> in the voice com program Skype (www.skype.org), I'm able to hear
> other
> people but I can't talk to them myself.
>
> Does anyone have a clue why?
>
> I believe this
What audio backend are you using ?
Directx capture has been implemented, but some audio backends havent it
at the moment.
> in the voice com program Skype (www.skype.org), I'm able to hear
> other
> people but I can't talk to them myself.
>
> Does anyone have a clue why?
>
> I believe this progr
36 matches
Mail list logo
