Hello,
I am making slow progress with this thing. It grew sort of
usable: can be cross compiled and run to produce sensible
output (tested on XP only). Present questions:
1. How to integrate cross compilation into the Makefile?
2. It is possible to compile this as a Winelib application,
but
Has anyone actually tried to get a patent licence from the patent holder
(i.e. Borland) for this?
At 02.11 11/11/2003, Steven Edwards wrote:
Further run fails for Captive as 'secdrv.sys' is somehow broken driver as
it does not provide any way to mount a filesystem. :-?
secdrv isn't a filesystem, nor a volume driver. Filesystems and volume
drivers, in Windows NT, are special, and secdrv is nei
At 18.17 09/11/2003, Steven Edwards wrote:
The problem is how emulate windows kernel internal behavior (ie assembly
tips as NtCurrentTeb)
We have been looking in to loading this driver under ReactOS and all of
the functions are implemented but it still returns STATUS_UNSUCESSFULL. I
think that t
Hello,
I guess we want to use compiler exceptions on Mingw/Windows?
gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include-Wall
-mpreferred-stack-bounda
ry=2 -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -D_WIN32_IE=0x0501
-D_WIN32_
WINNT=0x0501 -DWINVER=0x0501 -o spec16.o spec16.c
In file included f
Hello Jan!
--- Jan Kratochvil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:19:45 +0100, Raphaël Junqueira wrote:
> ...
> > > BTW, I have got as far with loading secdrv.sys as crashing on
> unimplemented
> > > IoCreateDevice. I believe the Io* functions will be the biggest
> problems
On November 10, 2003 15:34, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> You can easily upgrade to the october build, a GUI (winesetuptk) can write
> the config for you, see
> www003.portalis.it/115/
I am sending you email, because your message did not appear on the mailing
list, so I can't respond to it there
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:19:45 +0100, Raphaël Junqueira wrote:
...
> > BTW, I have got as far with loading secdrv.sys as crashing on unimplemented
> > IoCreateDevice. I believe the Io* functions will be the biggest problems.
It is no problem loading it and initializing it by Captive NTFS for GN
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:59, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> The DMCA does not require copyright violation, what is illegal is
> "circumventing" the protection measure, it doesn't really matter if
> the replacement code has the same functionality or not.
Decryption is a different matter - that's banned
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:00, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I don't get it. As far as I understand, so long as the code in the Wine
> archives does not allow running copied discs, we are not violating the
> DMCA. If someone else takes Wine code and modifies it, that's where the
> DMCA violation happens.
I
Okay... I've sendt the trace to Lionel, if anybody else wants it, I will
mail it to the list.
Greetings,
-- Thomas
_
My worst enemy gave me a copy of Windows...
Hello,
The patch:
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2003/11/0011.html
>Fixed type and protection values returned by NtQueryVirtualMemory to
>be closer to what Windows does.
>Allow using MEM_SYSTEM without MEM_RESERVE to avoid 64k alignment.
>Use pread instead of lseek+read when faking mmap
Mike Hearn wrote:
They can't post via the gmane interface. Google is OK I guess.
If you see this, then posting via gmane works fine. I've been doing it
for quite awhile now.
On Mon, Nov 10, Eric Pouech wrote:
> half of what you (rightfully) suggest to fix had been broken for very
> long in msdos/int21.c (so don't blame me too much... at least not for
> that half)
Yes, I know msdos/int21.c contains lots of broken code and
I'm pretty sure your patch did not add any ne
(This message was originally posted on wine-users who suggest it belongs on
wine-devel, my apologies if this is inappropriate.)
I am trying to build a program using the wine libraries. I am following the
recipies given in the docs without much understanding of what is actually
happening. The f
Jukka Heinonen wrote:
A few comments about this patch by Eric Pouech.
Structure DosHeap must not be moved to winedos.
There already exists per drive media ID byte which
should be used and biosdate, while it may be needed
by some programs, won't do any good in a separate 16-bit
segment. Also, INT2
Jeremy Newman wrote:
Actually is the date of the post. So setting it to
November 30th would be bad. I propose this instead:
--- /dev/null 2003-09-08 21:59:07.0 +0200
+++ news/2003111002.xml 2003-11-10 20:12:23.0 +0100
+
+ November 10, 2003
+ Wine presentation at the Tel-Aviv U
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:25:29 -0800, Sir Dan Kegel scribed thus:
> It's a myth that mailing lists are outdated.
> The web-based forums and wikis people are advocating
> all have their own drawbacks IMHO.
They have distinct advantages too. But, let's not confuse wikis and web
forums here. My proposa
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:15:25 +0100, Sir Roderick Colenbrander scribed
thus:
> Personally I don't think the problem is where the forum is hosted. Installing
> a forum like for example phpbb is a piece of a cake.
So go do it. What, you don't have write access to WineHQ? I guess Jeremy
will have to
Actually is the date of the post. So setting it to
November 30th would be bad. I propose this instead:
--- /dev/null 2003-09-08 21:59:07.0 +0200
+++ news/2003111002.xml 2003-11-10 20:12:23.0 +0100
+
+ November 10, 2003
+ Wine presentation at the Tel-Aviv University Linux Club
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Lundi 10 Novembre 2003 16:18, Robert Shearman a écrit :
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Raphaël Junqueira
> > Sent: 10 November 2003 08:05
> > To: Lionel Ulmer; Marcus Meissner
> > C
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
[...]
> Make that "Tel-Aviv University Linux Club (Telux)", and I'm great with it.
Like so?
--- /dev/null 2003-09-08 21:59:07.0 +0200
+++ news/2003113001.xml 2003-11-10 20:12:23.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+
+ November 30, 2003
+ Wine pr
Francois Gouget wrote:
Great. I propose to add the following news item. Shachar, does it
look ok to you?
Newman, it's the first I hack the news items so I hope I got it right. I
was not sure about the date in particular: we want users to see the date
of the presentation so I was not sure whether t
Hi there,
On November 10, 2003 12:25 pm, Dan Kegel wrote:
> It's a myth that mailing lists are outdated.
> The web-based forums and wikis people are advocating
> all have their own drawbacks IMHO.
me too
I think news/smtp gateways, combined with a decent archive, are the best
all-round option f
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Last time the subject came up, someone suggested I make the date
> available so it can be published on the winehq.org site.
>
> I'm going to give a lecture about Wine in a club called "Telux". The web
> site is at http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/te
On 10 Nov 03, at 9:25, Dan Kegel wrote:
> It's a myth that mailing lists are outdated.
> The web-based forums and wikis people are advocating
> all have their own drawbacks IMHO.
I concur. I quite like having the email archived on my PC where I
can search quickly and easily. And that goes for
It's a myth that mailing lists are outdated.
The web-based forums and wikis people are advocating
all have their own drawbacks IMHO.
Why not simply point people to
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel
and/or
news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel
(or maybe even
http:
Personally I don't think the problem is where the forum is hosted. Installing
a forum like for example phpbb is a piece of a cake.
Roderick
On Monday 10 November 2003 16:40, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The idea of a user forum was raised on IRC a few weeks ago and Jeremy White
> suggested we use
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Mike Hearn wrote:
> What do people think? Good plan? Bad plan?
Never used linuxquestions.org before, but it seems to be a decent site.
I think it's a good start for such a forum, it is a quick way to see
if it's useful at all without investing a lot of work into it up front.
Hi,
The idea of a user forum was raised on IRC a few weeks ago and Jeremy White
suggested we use a web based forum as the newsgroups and mailing lists
were too hard to use/outdated.
I've talked to Jeremy Garcia who runs linuxquestions.org and he said he'd
be willing to host the forum, probably as
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Raphaël Junqueira
> Sent: 10 November 2003 08:05
> To: Lionel Ulmer; Marcus Meissner
> Cc: Alexandre Julliard; Wine Devel
> Subject: Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on
> WINE?
>
A few comments about this patch by Eric Pouech.
Structure DosHeap must not be moved to winedos.
There already exists per drive media ID byte which
should be used and biosdate, while it may be needed
by some programs, won't do any good in a separate 16-bit
segment. Also, INT21_CreateHeap is unnece
Hi all,
Last time the subject came up, someone suggested I make the date
available so it can be published on the winehq.org site.
I'm going to give a lecture about Wine in a club called "Telux". The web
site is at http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/telux/ (supposedly in Hebrew, but if
you click the "Adva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Le Lundi 10 Novembre 2003 08:11, Marcus Meissner a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 07:46:58PM +0100, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:32:02AM +, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > > Lionel, could QEMU be used here? I guess the drive
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 07:46:58PM +0100, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:32:02AM +, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > Lionel, could QEMU be used here? I guess the driver expects to have
> > kernel level access to the machine, so we could either:
>
> Well, as I have no idea how .SYS loadi
35 matches
Mail list logo
