don't know the codebase of either,
but you have to be careful with handing it back and forth. In particular,
take a look at wl_display_prepare_read:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/tree/src/wayland-client.c#n1078
I hope that's helpful,
--Jason Ekstrand
>
>
ine option.
This brings the wayland backend almost up to par, in terms of functionality
with the X11 backend.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
The new version makes window title handling a little more sane.
man/weston.ini.man | 4 +-
src/compositor-wayla
In retrospect, this should probably go earlier in the series, before the
second compositor-wayland patch. It doesn't actually matter, but it makes
more sense there.
--Jason Ekstrand
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This makes button handling more correct co
On Oct 30, 2013 3:59 AM, "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
>
> On 30 October 2013 09:44, Neil Roberts wrote:
> > Tomeu Vizoso writes:
> >
> >> What I fail to see is why a single sync should be enough, as we don't
> >> know when the GPU will signal that it's done with the buffer that we
> >> are waiting to b
ts for that
matter) are coming to the client, then I would consider that a weston bug.
We should really find a way to ensure that buffers do get flushed
eventually so clients don't starve(maybe once per frame).
I'm open to the possibility that this is a really bad idea. However, it
seems mor
This allows the caller to specify whether the wl_buffer.release event (if
one is generated) should be sent immediately or queued for later. This
only makes a difference if this weston_buffer_reference call will release
the buffer. If there are other references to the buffer remaining, the
argumen
y. Some comments below:
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> > Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> >> At this point, I think I can propose a solution which should allow for
> >> client control while still keeping the compositor in control:
> &
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> Yes, in theory they could read the configuration of the compositor.
>>
>
> I really don't want to build this kind of inconsistency into the system
>> and I don't see why it
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 31 October 2013 02:54, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30 October 2013 09:44, Neil Roberts wrote:
> >> > Tomeu Vizoso writes:
This is a better fix than 4a7409a1 because it maintains proper state in the
frame in the case where the client actually has a close handler. The other
would not properly reset the frame state and didn't check the last two
statusses
---
clients/window.c | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 10
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:24:53PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
> > ---
> > src/compositor-wayland.c | 76
> ++--
> > 1 file
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gregory Merchan
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> >>
> >> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, in theory
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gregory Merchan
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> >>
> >> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, in theory
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> ... snip
>
>
>> Gregory,
>> Thank you very much for your e-mail. I think that helps a lot. The lack
>> of code is ok because I think Rafael is
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/compositor-wayland.c | 48
1 file changed, 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compositor-wayland.c b/src/compositor-wayland.c
index 50bcb8d..f71faa7 100644
--- a/src/compositor-wayland.c
+++ b/src/compositor
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/compositor-wayland.c | 16
src/compositor.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compositor-wayland.c b/src/compositor-wayland.c
index e5c6726..e688820 100644
--- a/src/compositor-wayland.c
, it will create exactly one fullscreen output. If you want more
fullscreen outputs, you need to use the other method for now.
Jason Ekstrand (6):
compositor-wayland: Remove unused output handling code
compositor-wayland: rename wayland_compositor.inputs to input_list
compositor-wayland: Fix
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/compositor-wayland.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compositor-wayland.c b/src/compositor-wayland.c
index f71faa7..5f691a7 100644
--- a/src/compositor-wayland.c
+++ b/src/compositor-wayland.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7
This adds fullscreen support to the wayland backend. You can make any
output fullscreen by the shortcut CTRL+ALT+F. You can also run weston with
the --fullscreen option which causes it to create a single fullscreen
output.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/compositor-wayland.c | 296
This cleans up the configuration and command parsing and separates it from
compositor/output initialization.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/compositor-wayland.c | 172 +++
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/compositor-wayland.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compositor-wayland.c b/src/compositor-wayland.c
index 5f691a7..181d6bb 100644
--- a/src/compositor-wayland.c
+++ b/src/compositor-wayland.c
@@ -862,8 +862,6
On Nov 8, 2013 3:46 AM, "Pekka Paalanen" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:13:32 -0600
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
> > ---
> > src/compositor-wayland.c | 16
> > src/compositor.c | 1 +
>
crop&scale in the wl_subsurface protocol. It's worth noting that this same
issue makes putting a video (from an external source) in a SHM subsurface
frame really awkward. See also this e-mail from April:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2013-April/008875.html
Hope it
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
This belongs in the Wayland backend patch series
man/weston.man | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/weston.man b/man/weston.man
index 39d854b..2ee3616 100644
--- a/man/weston.man
+++ b/man/weston.man
@@ -148,9 +148,26
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
man/weston.man | 20 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/weston.man b/man/weston.man
index 39d854b..2095819 100644
--- a/man/weston.man
+++ b/man/weston.man
@@ -148,9 +148,27 @@ Name of the Wayland display to
On Nov 11, 2013 3:18 AM, "Pekka Paalanen" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:26:28 -0600
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
> > ---
> > man/weston.man | 20 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 del
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 2013 3:18 AM, "Pekka Paalanen" wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:26:28 -0600
> > Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
> > > ---
>
Without this, weston will segfault whenever the focus is a non-client
surface such as the black surface in fullscreen.
---
src/input.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/input.c b/src/input.c
index 6637882..b6130d6 100644
--- a/src/input.c
+++ b/src/input.c
---
My knowledge of the DRM backend is rather small, so I don't know if this is
really the right fix. I hit this when the the mode fails to set. See also
compositor-drm.c:606
src/compositor-drm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/compositor-drm.c b/src/comp
in windows.
Somewhere in here we would also need an event to let the client tell the
server whether it decided to decorate or not. There's also a race in here
that we need to solve, but I think we can handle that.
There's my thoughts.
be able to link against older versions? I'm thinking
that's probably not an issue.
3) might be good to add a note specifying that the marshalling functions
will create and return exactly one proxy if the given interface is non-null
and then enforce that.
Hope that helps.
--Jason Ekstrand
one:
http://people.collabora.com/~jonny/wayland/wl_surface.html#Request:attach
Thanks,
--Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have recently been working on some Wayland protocol stuff and found
> referring to the XML tiresome. Telepathy's
col. If we don't
alter the details of wl_drm in the rename, it shouldn't be too hard to move
everyone over from wl_drm to mesa_drm.
Hope that's sensible/helpful.
--Jason Ekstrand
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
Pekka and I already talked about this one and I think it's the right thing
to do.
--Jason Ekstrand
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Nov 26, 2013 11:20 AM, "Jonny Lamb" wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> This removes the calls to weston_surface_buffer_width/height() from
This one is also a good idea. Removes code duplication and keeps the
surface size calculations in compositor.c where they belong.
--Jason Ekstrand
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Nov 26, 2013 11:20 AM, "Jonny Lamb" wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Replace the two fu
This one is a nice cleanup.
--Jason Ekstrand
Kristian,
I would recommend pushing the first three right away as they will help with
removing weston_view.width/height.
--Jason Ekstrand
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Nov 26, 2013 11:20 AM, "Jonny Lamb" wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalane
This has a couple of additional implications for the internal weston API:
1) weston_view_configure no longer exists. Use weston_view_set_position
instead.
2) The weston_surface.configure callback no longer takes a width and
height. If you need these, surface.width/height are set before
ess minimum number of buffers. The proposed patch is for the
second case. Since the compositor releasing buffers at strange times is a
backend-specific thing, this allows the backend to say "the client probably
wants this now, go ahead and post it".
I hope that makes things more clear.
--Ja
of weston_surface manually.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
desktop-shell/shell.c | 9 +++--
src/compositor.c | 15 +++
src/compositor.h | 4
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/desktop-shell/shell.c b/desktop-shell/shell.c
index
Yeah, this is a good idea.
--Jason Ekstrand
Reviewed-By: Jason Ekstrand
On Dec 6, 2013 5:48 AM, "Giulio Camuffo" wrote:
> The device may not have a resource for the client yet, but install
> the listeners nevertheless.
> Fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id
that
weston_surface_set_size is only for non-client surfaces and therefore has
the assert.
--Jason Ekstrand
On Dec 9, 2013 2:16 PM, "Giulio Camuffo" wrote:
> 2013/12/9 Bryce W. Harrington :
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:32:03PM -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >> Surfaces that
Giulio,
Couple thoughts. First, you don't provide an implementation of the
clipping in any of the renderers. Probably have to wait on the Collabora
people for the RPi renderer, but we should have pixman and gl
implementations of this.
Second, is there any particular reason why you're using pixm
, that could be "if the app has the focus-stealing permission, show
the window, otherwise blink the notification bar" or something like that.
However, allowing the app to say "you need to show me now" and being able
to expect that its demand will be followed to the letter
One comment below. Otherwise, it looks good (though I haven't tested it
yet.) Also, I'd like to decide what I think about the first patch before
merging. I'll get back to you Monday or Tuesday.
--Jason
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Giulio Camuffo
wrote:
> this adds a mechanism to mask the
face
is destroyed. It's possible that we could remove the destructor and tie
the two lifecycles together. However, we need to be *really* careful about
doing so.
--Jason Ekstrand
>
> Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons
> ---
> desktop-shell/shell.c | 25 ++-
ds the "xdg_surface_present()" request,
> then a little blinking balloon, technically similar to a panel tooltip,
> will appear at the bottom of the screen for some time.
> When clicked, the balloon would then make the surface appear back on the
> current screen, positioned as it w
And whatever we choose, we should try to make it consistent with the
> subsurface roles, too, so we don't have different semantics for those.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sjoerd Simons <
> sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2014-07-21
Sorry for not looking at it. I'm mostly ok with the API so it's fine that
you pushed it. I did have a question or two though.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Marek Chalupa
>
> When an error occurs, wl_display_get_error() does not
> provide any way of getting kno
Thanks. I just pushed this (with a small fix to change the variable name
from "surface" to "id").
--Jason Ekstrand
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Boyan Ding wrote:
> Only when reading through mails today did I find I had duplicated
> efforts [1], sorry.
>
Fine with me. Pushed.
--Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Bryce W. Harrington <
b.harring...@samsung.com> wrote:
> Use function linking syntax instead of variable linking, to resolve two
> warnings:
>
> wayland-server.h:167: warning: explicit link request to
Yeah, I think this looks ok.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> It looks like that in the great conversion introducing weston_view, one
> conditional was forgotten from the code that builds the global fl
Couple thoughs. First, we need to also update
drm_output_prepare_cursor_view to check against the size coming from GBM
instead of against the hard-coded 64x64 it's currently checking against.
Without changing that, we are still restricted to 64x64 regardless of the
GBM checking.
Other questions b
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 29.07.2014 16:01, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Couple thoughs. First, we need to also update
> > drm_output_prepare_cursor_view to check against the size coming from GBM
> > instead of against the hard-coded 64x64 it
that we're
actually taking advantage of our new-found big cursors.
Thanks,
--Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 29.07.2014 16:36, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Michel Dänzer > <mailto:mic...@daenzer.net&
reuse
> an existing term. One reason is to prevent somebody else from adding a
> redundant api for that term, because they did not realize "present" is the
> thing they are looking for.
>
We also discussed the name "attention". The reason why we didn'
ns when you cycle through
> windows with "Mod-Tab" and choose one.
>
Given that it's not supposed to be directly tied to a specific compositor
action, that's probably best. I just wanted to make sure you were thinking
about this and had a reason.
--Jason
>
>
>
I just pushed this because it fixes a bug. I really don't like the fact
that we have to track this separately from spring.target. We should
probably fix the animation code so we don't.
--Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jonny Lamb
wrote:
> If we're
Both of these look good to me. I'll get around to pushing them soon.
--Jason
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> ---
> src/input.c | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/input.c b/src/input.c
> index 4aa8ca7..aaa2223 100644
> -
Bump. I just pushed Jasper's simple patch before seeing Daniel's comment
about this one. Did we ever figure out pekka's crash? I'd like to see
this committed soon.
--Jason Ekstrand
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:0
Sorry for not posting to the ML, but this looked good so I pushed it.
--Jason
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> This patch series introduces a new API to find an open Wayland display
> so that compositors don't need to reimplement all this code. This way,
> the code s
run/user/1000/wayland-1.lock, maybe another
> compositor is running
>unable to lock lockfile /run/user/1000/wayland-2.lock, maybe another
> compositor is running
> etc. ...
>
> only when manually adding the socket. It's really annoying when the
>
I think this is ok. To my knowledge, no one is re-binding wl_display or
even relying on that global being exposed.
--Jason
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> The idea here was that once upon a time, clients could rebind wl_display
> to a higher version, so we offered th
I squished in a little note for/from myself as to why this is OK. I pushed
this one and the other 3
--Jason
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> An error makes the client exit, which cleans up the resources anyway.
> ---
> desktop-shell/input-panel.c | 1 -
> desktop-she
ever, the client shouldn't expect
anything in particular. It could, for instance, result in no cursor.
> Obviously, no valid program should ever try to reuse a cursor surface as
> an xdg_surface.
>
Yeah, feel free to kill the client fo
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Pekka Paalanen
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:31:27 -0700
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Jasper St. Pierre <
> jstpie...@mecheye.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In the xdg-shell thread
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:13:06 +0300
> Giulio Camuffo wrote:
>
> > 2014-07-15 20:39 GMT+03:00 Daniel Stone :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, July 15, 2014, Giulio Camuffo
>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Libinput is stabilizing soon, so let's flip the default switch now. The
> old input code will still be carried as an option for a while.
>
> Cc: Peter Hutt
Pekka,
I have one nitpick below. However, if we can't find a good solution, I'm
ok with pushing as-is.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:29:21 +0300
> Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > From: Pekka
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>
>
> On 08/20/2014 03:06 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:04:54 -0700
>> Bill Spitzak wrote:
>>
>
> Destroying the last protocol object for the role does not remove the
>>> role, correct? The client can recreate a new p
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> Define what a role is, and what restrictions there are.
>
> A change to existing behaviour is that a role cannot be changed at all
> once set. However, this is
That applies to the whole series, BTW
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> LGTM
> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
>
>> From: Pekka Paalanen
>>
>> Define what a role is, a
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:55:49 -0400
> "Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
>
> > The idea here was that once upon a time, clients could rebind wl_display
> > to a higher version, so we offered the ability to rebind it
> > here. However, this is parti
As I mentioned on IRC, I don't really like adding and using an enum value
without bumping protocol version. However, the only time we ever use it is
to kill the client so the worst thing that can happen is that the client
doesn't report the error correctly. I think I'm ok w
we don't make any changes to xdg_shell
between 1.6 and 1.7, the universe will break again at 1.7. This is because
we'll pull the experimental_version request which changes the order of
things. Do we have a plan for how to keep this from going too badly?
--Jason Ekstrand
Just a couple quick comments below.
I can't fin where this goes, so I'm putting it here: Why are we having
compositors send an initial configure event again? Given that we have a
serial, tiling compositors can just send a configure and wait until the
client responds to the event. Non-tiling com
On Aug 26, 2014 4:32 AM, "Pekka Paalanen" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:36:58 +0100
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 23 August 2014 15:38, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:51:19 -0700
> > > Jason
On Aug 26, 2014 1:01 AM, "Giulio Camuffo" wrote:
>
> 2014-08-26 10:24 GMT+03:00 Pekka Paalanen :
> > On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:51:57 -0700
> > Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> >> Just a couple quick comments below.
> >>
> >> I can'
7:50:47 +0300
> >> > Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> 2014-08-26 17:39 GMT+03:00 Jason Ekstrand :
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Aug 26, 2014 1:01 AM, "Giulio Camuffo"
> wrote:
> >> >
Really, do we need a whole 30 seconds? You can easily do enough
interaction to crash something in 30 seconds. Other than that, this looks
fine.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> If weston-desktop-shell
his needs to be explicitly stated to be
double-buffered with commit.
I think popups look OK but I don't have much experience there.
--Jason Ekstrand
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail
eper changes to Weston:
https://github.com/jekstrand/weston/commits/wip/transforms
--Jason Ekstrand
On Aug 29, 2014 7:56 AM, "Derek Foreman" wrote:
> Currently if you try to zoom with mod+scrollwheel the pixman
> backend will stop rendering anything at all and will continuously
il with a bunch of bugs. Pick one and try to squash it! If you're
feeling more adventurous, I've got a project or two that I wouldn't mind
someone picking up. (I haven't had time lately for much weston hacking.)
--Jason Ekstrand
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
On Aug 29, 2014 6:25 PM, "Derek Foreman" wrote:
>
> On 29/08/14 06:42 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Derek,
> > I haven't had a chance to look that hard at or play with this patch yet.
> > Hopefully I can look at it before too long. One quick question though
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 23:35:37 -0700
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > On Aug 29, 2014 6:25 PM, "Derek Foreman" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 29/08/14 06:42 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > > Derek,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Derek Foreman
wrote:
> On 01/09/14 04:52 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 23:35:37 -0700
> >> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >>
> >&
I took a look at it too and it looks good to me
--Jason
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:47:14 +0200
> Marek Chalupa wrote:
>
> > Calling wl_display_read_events() after an error should be equivalent
> > to wl_display_cancel_read(), so that display
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:35:40 +0200
> Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:16:06PM +0300, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> > > 2014-09-17 23:11 GMT+03:00 Jonas Ådahl :
> > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:56:13PM +0300, Giulio Camuffo w
> >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:43:47AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Pekka Paalanen <
> ppaala...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 201
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Pekka Paalanen
wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:46:20 -0700
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:00:21AM -0600, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> >
> > > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:33:13 +0200
> > > > Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:43:47AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Pekka Paalanen <
> ppaala...@g
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Nils Chr. Brause
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:44:04 +0200
> > "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote:
> >
> > > This replaces "[PATCH wayland] Add "enum" attribute to "arg" elements".
> > > Previous concers h
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Pekka Paalanen
wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:43:22 -0700
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:20:53 +0200
> > > Jonas Ådahl wrote:
&
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Nils Chr. Brause <
>> nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:31:27AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Pekka Paalanen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:43:22 -0700
> > > Jason Ekstrand wrote
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Nils Chr. Brause
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:59:39 +0800
> > Boyan Ding wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:27 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >>
>
Hi Matthieu,
Could you please provide more explanation on what use-cases you are
considering and why the current proposal fails to accomplish them? All I
was able to get from your post was the example of a TV remote. It's all
well and good to completely disagree with the proposed approach, but
wi
Bill, That's an interesting idea, but there are a few problems (which may
be solvable). I do kind of like the way it completely sidesteps the
acceleration issue.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> In any case this all sounds excessively complicated. I think this will
> work
oposal can do that Jonas' one can't do ?
> => The only thing I can find is the case where a seat doesn't have a
> wl_pointer but have relative events. For all the rest, Jonas' proposal
> seems to work.
> => My proposition seems simpler to me. Less dependencies b
On Sep 25, 2014 3:04 PM, "Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>>
>> On 09/25/2014 01:57 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>>
>>>
https://github.com/magcius/weston/commit/c1e5a846f4f57400bca1262111f9793e451c5b49
>>
>>
>> That patch has nothing to do wi
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Carlos Garnacho
> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Clasen <
>> matthias.cla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
>>> wrote:
601 - 700 of 743 matches
Mail list logo