Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-10-03 Thread Giulio Camuffo
2014-09-26 19:39 GMT+03:00 Jason Ekstrand : > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Jasper St. Pierre > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Carlos Garnacho >> wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Clasen >>> wrote: On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-26 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Carlos Garnacho > wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Clasen < >> matthias.cla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Jasper St. Pierre >>> wrote:

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-26 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hey, > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Clasen < > matthias.cla...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Jasper St. Pierre >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Anyway, here's the list: >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> 7) Root

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-26 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hey, On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Jasper St. Pierre > wrote: > > > >> Anyway, here's the list: > > > > >> > >> 7) Root window drop > > > > > > When is this useful? > > One place where it is used is when dragging tabs out of a wi

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Bill Spitzak
On 09/25/2014 03:04 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: You mean like the existing set_parent request that has been there since xdg-shell has landed? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/tree/protocol/xdg-shell.xml#n140 Yes except it needs a guarantee about what happens when you change parent

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Well, it can't be a state enum, because that's from compositor to client. We certainly could make it a small extension as part of gtk_shell, though. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2014 3:04 PM, "Jasper St. Pierre" > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 25,

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Sep 25, 2014 3:04 PM, "Jasper St. Pierre" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote: >> >> On 09/25/2014 01:57 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> >>> https://github.com/magcius/weston/commit/c1e5a846f4f57400bca1262111f9793e451c5b49 >> >> >> That patch has nothing to do wi

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote: > On 09/25/2014 01:57 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > https://github.com/magcius/weston/commit/c1e5a846f4f57400bca1262111f979 >> 3e451c5b49 >> > > That patch has nothing to do with what is needed. > > You don't need a "modal window type". Thi

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Bill Spitzak
On 09/25/2014 01:57 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: https://github.com/magcius/weston/commit/c1e5a846f4f57400bca1262111f9793e451c5b49 That patch has nothing to do with what is needed. You don't need a "modal window type". This is trivial for a client to do by just pretending that whatever keyst

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote: > I agree it would be better to just hide the window. Pointer lock (being > discussed elsewhere) should not be lost when this happens. It sounds like > the loss of grabs is why you lower rather than hide in X. Also if your > client wants to id

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote: > On 09/25/2014 07:32 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > 1) Marking dialogs as modal (needed so we can implement the 'attached >> modal' visuals of gnome-shell >> > > I notice this one was ignored. There seems to be some set of people >

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Bill Spitzak
On 09/25/2014 07:32 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: 1) Marking dialogs as modal (needed so we can implement the 'attached modal' visuals of gnome-shell I notice this one was ignored. There seems to be some set of people working on wayland that hate overlapping windows and want to guarant

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> Anyway, here's the list: >> >> 1) Marking dialogs as modal (needed so we can implement the 'attached >> modal' visuals of gnome-shell What about this one ? >> 2) Lowering windows (used e.g. by GtkInspector to get out of the way >> w

Re: xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Hi, > > so yesterday we released what we described as a day-to-day usable > GNOME/Wayland. Congratulations to everybody involved in defining > xdg-shell on getting us this far. > > But... (I wouldn't write if there wasn't a but) we are not

xdg shell status and gaps

2014-09-25 Thread Matthias Clasen
Hi, so yesterday we released what we described as a day-to-day usable GNOME/Wayland. Congratulations to everybody involved in defining xdg-shell on getting us this far. But... (I wouldn't write if there wasn't a but) we are not yet calling it a '100% complete port' because there are still a numbe