On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Andrew Guertin wrote:
> There's been a bunch of talk recently about libXcursor and its
> (potentially unneeded) dependencies. There was some talk about splitting
> it up, and/or creating a libwlcursor. I looked into this a bit, and
> found the following:
>
> Every f
There's been a bunch of talk recently about libXcursor and its
(potentially unneeded) dependencies. There was some talk about splitting
it up, and/or creating a libwlcursor. I looked into this a bit, and
found the following:
Every function in the api (in Xcursor.h) falls into one of two categories
