On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:08:51PM +0100, Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar wrote:
> I was wondering whether we can find a better solution to the scenarios
> where Wayland crashes.
> You all know that for the X case, when it crashes, everything open is
> lost, you need to re-login and you need to reopen your
Sorry, I didn't reply-all
> I personally think this is feasible. On Mac os x there was a utility called
> Fermata which would actually freeze an application until you gave it the go
> ahead to continue. The kernels of both Linux and Mac derive from Unix, and so
> I would assume such core functi
2010/12/14 Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering whether we can find a better solution to the scenarios
> where Wayland crashes.
> You all know that for the X case, when it crashes, everything open is
> lost, you need to re-login and you need to reopen your apps again.
> Non-saved wor
Hi. As far as I know, X apps always had the ability to reconnect, its just
that none ever did. I don't know why, maybe piximaps or windows states/ID's
where lost or something... Or the idea never caught on. X apps don't crash
when they lose connection to the x server, its just that they all (mos
Hi,
I was wondering whether we can find a better solution to the scenarios
where Wayland crashes.
You all know that for the X case, when it crashes, everything open is
lost, you need to re-login and you need to reopen your apps again.
Non-saved work will be lost.
Is it possible to change this for
