On 03/16/2012 05:54 AM, yan.w...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> I may destroy (Hide) and re-construct surafce (show) to achieve this
> point. But I think we may have 2 reasons to implement show/hide:
> 1. It may reduce unnecessary cost when switch frequently.
Not really, since "destroy" in this case jus
I may destroy (Hide) and re-construct surafce (show) to achieve this
point. But I think we may have 2 reasons to implement show/hide:
1. It may reduce unnecessary cost when switch frequently.
2. re-construct surface may have to restore some user data. If wayland
could do this, it could avoid applic
There was a bit of discussion about this because I thought it was
necessary, too. However it appears that there is no actual reason to
differentiate hide from the destruction of the surface (you then show by
making a new surface and attaching the image buffer to that).
yan.w...@linux.intel.com
Hi, All,
Current Wayland seems not support to show/hide existed Wayland Window.
May it be implemented in the future? Many applications need this
feature. (E.g. chromium browser)
Thanks.
Best regards
Yan Wang
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland
