On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:49:16 -0800
Joel Winarske wrote:
> @pq
> I think this approach might better suit our use cases (CI health gate /
> client regression testing):
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/merge_requests/24
>
> I would be happy to push this forward, seeing it hasn't mov
> There's https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/266 about
this.
Thanks, yes I have that book marked.
@pq
I think this approach might better suit our use cases (CI health gate /
client regression testing):
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/merge_requests/24
I would
On 2022-11-07 10:27, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2022 16:14:44 -0700
> Joel Winarske wrote:
>
>> Does the base surface ever get occluded?
>
> Anything could be occluded or off-screen at any time.
>
> However, if parent surface is completely occluded/off-screen, then that
> should not
On Sat, 5 Nov 2022 16:14:44 -0700
Joel Winarske wrote:
> Okay thanks for the input. I sorted it out, and it's working great.
>
> My learning - Simply implement a frame callback for each sub surface and
> base surface, empty or otherwise. No need for any other commit calls.
>
> What is the rec
Okay thanks for the input. I sorted it out, and it's working great.
My learning - Simply implement a frame callback for each sub surface and
base surface, empty or otherwise. No need for any other commit calls.
What is the recommended solution for counting frame rate with sub
surfaces? Does th
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 15:14:00 -0700
Joel Winarske wrote:
> Hi pq,
>
> I was thinking of a more full-featured example using sub surfaces with
> runtime positioning and z-order control.
>
> That aside I am having an interesting problem. In case of multiple
> surfaces, I only see the frame event fo
Hi pq,
I was thinking of a more full-featured example using sub surfaces with
runtime positioning and z-order control.
That aside I am having an interesting problem. In case of multiple
surfaces, I only see the frame event for the last added surface.
Surface A is behind B and C (tiled), none oc
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:08:10 -0700
Joel Winarske wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. Much appreciated.
>
> I'm interested in implementing a sub-surface example. Is a MR/PR of
> interest?
To which repository, and what do you want to demonstrate with it?
E.g.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/w
Thanks for the clarification. Much appreciated.
I'm interested in implementing a sub-surface example. Is a MR/PR of
interest?
Thanks,
Joel
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:53 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 10:14:42 -0700
> Joel Winarske wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the enlightenment!
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 10:14:42 -0700
Joel Winarske wrote:
> Thank you for the enlightenment!
>
> Adding the ordered commit calls was the missing link.
>
> Do the commit calls need to happen based on the active Z-order, or based on
> the order of surface creation?
They need to be ordered by sub-s
Thank you for the enlightenment!
Adding the ordered commit calls was the missing link.
Do the commit calls need to happen based on the active Z-order, or based on
the order of surface creation?
Thanks again,
Joel
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:56:14 -0700
Joel Winarske wrote:
> When using sub_surfaces what is the expected behavior for frame callbacks
> on a given surface?
Hi,
frame callbacks will trigger at the compositor's discretion after the
wl_surface update with that frame callback request is applied, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
