On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:54 PM, 이상진 wrote:
> >> Also (on the patch) it looks like if there is an error it destroys the
> >> wl_socket object, could this do the wrong thing if the fd was supplied
> from
> >> outside?
>
> > So like if the socket object couldn't be initted or added to the display
>
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle
>> Also (on the patch) it looks like if there is an error it destroys the>> wl_socket object, could this do the wrong thing if the fd was supplied from>> outside?> So like if the socket object couldn't be initted or added to the display> for some reason
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:21:04AM -0800, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Also (on the patch) it looks like if there is an error it destroys the
> wl_socket object, could this do the wrong thing if the fd was supplied from
> outside?
So like if the socket object couldn't be initted or added to the display
f
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle
I don't see any reason for the wl_display_add_socket_fd_auto and wl_display_add_socket_auto functions, as they are the same as passing NULL for the name to wl_display_add_socket_fd, right?==> No, The wl_display_add_socket_fd_auto is different action to
I don't see any reason for the wl_display_add_socket_fd_auto and
wl_display_add_socket_auto functions, as they are the same as passing NULL
for the name to wl_display_add_socket_fd, right?
Also (on the patch) it looks like if there is an error it destroys the
wl_socket object, could this do the w
