: Freitag, 22. Dezember 2017 16:12
> To: Pekka Paalanen
> Cc: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB); wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Teyfel,
> Michael (ADITG/ESB)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen
>
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:01:09 -0600
> Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
>> Hi Pekka,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
>> wrote:
>> > Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
>> > Because it is violating w
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:01:09 -0600
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
> wrote:
> > Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
> > Because it is violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell
> > interface.
> >
> >
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> On 11/7/17 6:01 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pekka,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
>>> Because it is violating wayland protoc
On 11/7/17 6:01 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
Hi Pekka,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
wrote:
Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor.
Because it is violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell
interface.
The wl_shell protocol was designed fo
Hi Pekka,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
wrote:
> Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor. Because it is
> violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell interface.
>
> Therefore, we have to at least support wl_shell interface in ivi-shell. Wh
: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB); wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:08:19 -0500
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> I'm not at all familiar with the internal implementation of ivi-shell,
> so I can&
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the very reason why ivi-shell ever came to be was that the operating
> environment of graphical applications in IVI was so different from a
> normal desktop, that it was simply impossible to have desktop
> applications work in a mea
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:08:19 -0500
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> I'm not at all familiar with the internal implementation of ivi-shell, so I
> can't give much meaningful review. But I am very much in favor of this
> patch series. Without wl_shell and xdg_shell support, I've never been able
> to really gi
...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoosier
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 16:09
To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Teyfel, Michael (ADITG/ESB)
Subject: Re: [PATCH weston 00/14] Desktop Protocol Support for IVI-Shell
I'm not at all familiar with the int
I'm not at all familiar with the internal implementation of ivi-shell, so I
can't give much meaningful review. But I am very much in favor of this
patch series. Without wl_shell and xdg_shell support, I've never been able
to really give ivi-shell serious consideration on my products. The ability
to
Hi,
I already reviewed the patches before Michael sent:
Reviewed-by: Emre Ucan
Best regards
Emre Ucan
Engineering Software Base (ADITG/ESB)
Tel. +49 5121 49 6937
> -Original Message-
> From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel-
> boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Michael Tey
12 matches
Mail list logo
