Hey,
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:51 -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> I guess I never replied to you like I usually do when I merge patches,
> but I commited your patches Dec 2nd. If you have a few spare cycles,
> could you have a look at this bug that look like stacking regressions
> from those pat
Hi Philip,
I guess I never replied to you like I usually do when I merge patches,
but I commited your patches Dec 2nd. If you have a few spare cycles,
could you have a look at this bug that look like stacking regressions
from those patches:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72547
tha
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 15:22 -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> But we need to wait for Rafaels xdg-shell patches to land first.
How far away from landing are they?
Regardless of how far away they are, would it make sense to commit some
of the more self-contained patches from my patchset (such as p
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 06:01:29PM +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> Here’s a series of patches which work towards improving the shell window
> stacking. They clean up the code and implement a more organised approach to
> stacking. They add a new test client, weston-stacking, for testing window
>
Here’s a series of patches which work towards improving the shell window
stacking. They clean up the code and implement a more organised approach to
stacking. They add a new test client, weston-stacking, for testing window
stacking and ordering.
I don’t claim the ordering they impose is perfect
