* Josh Leverette schrieb:
> Take this idea, but have it implemented in Wayland. Ideally this could be
> negotiated with the window manager so that it could be done on a per-program
> basis. When an application, such as Blender, is being used on a slow
> computer or a netbook, it might be desirabl
On 18 March 2011 04:14, Trevour Crow wrote:
>> From: Josh Leverette
>> Subject: Re: HPC (High Performance Compute) Architecture
>> To: "jonsm...@gmail.com"
>> Cc: "wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
>>
>> Date: Thursday, March 17,
> From: Josh Leverette
> Subject: Re: HPC (High Performance Compute) Architecture
> To: "jonsm...@gmail.com"
> Cc: "wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
>
> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 9:13 PM
> http://www.onlive.com ? But yeah, I was
>
http://www.onlive.com ? But yeah, I was wanting this to be user transparent for
all applications, since there is no way we could modify proprietary
applications that use a lot of processor real estate and this would be a one
time deal, no need to do it on an app by app basis. But, I understand.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Josh Leverette wrote:
> (And I have been known to get overexcited about ideas sometimes, which may
> cause an idea to go from cool to killer)
A couple of years ago there was a startup doing exactly this for video
games. They would buy video games and let you play
On 17 March 2011 11:49, Josh Leverette wrote:
> Ah, ok, it's good to hear something remotely (no pun intended) similar is in
> the works. And I don't predict lion taking over by any means, just being the
> best for a little while, even if expensive, and that windows hasn't been
> feature compet
(And I have been known to get overexcited about ideas sometimes, which may
cause an idea to go from cool to killer)
Sincerely,
Josh
On Mar 17, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Josh Leverette wrote:
> Ah, ok, it's good to hear something remotely (no pun intended) similar is in
> the works. And I don't pre
Ah, ok, it's good to hear something remotely (no pun intended) similar is in
the works. And I don't predict lion taking over by any means, just being the
best for a little while, even if expensive, and that windows hasn't been
feature competitive with Linux in at least a couple of years in my op
Mostly, it is identically equal to "remote Wayland protocol". Except that this
iSwifter thing is specific to remoting Flash applications.
Speaking of which there is a GSOC'11 proposal over on X.org to do the remote
Wayland protocol.
The parts about Lion taking over the world I am skeptical of
Um.
This sounds overly grandiose and not really Wayland-specific. Also, most
people don't have lots of iron sitting in their garages. I think you may
have upgraded "Wouldn't it be cool if...?" to "Dude, this is a killer
feature!"
Sending from a mobile, pardon the brevity. ~ C.
On Mar 16, 2011 7:1
ill of course, make this nasty hack obsolete since you can specify
> automount points of /home/ as type sshfs.
>
> If you don't want any disks, not even a USB key, booting over the network
> with gpxe is pretty easy to set up these days and uses HTTP or HTTPS instead
> of tf
If you don't want any disks, not even a USB key, booting over the network
with gpxe is pretty easy to set up these days and uses HTTP or HTTPS instead
of tftp. It's really easy on DD-WRT or OpenWRT, or any system with dnsmasq.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Josh Leverette wro
HPC (High Performance Compute) Architecture
...the means by which we can make the Lion tremble.
I have hung around in the shadows of Wayland's development since it was an
infant, reading the different discussions that have taken place. I've
commented occasionally, but not very ofte
13 matches
Mail list logo
