Hi,
On 19 January 2018 at 16:21, Derek Foreman wrote:
> It's my opinion that supporting xdg-shell final is rather important for the
> wayland reference compositor.
>
> So, I think we need to consider removing xdg-shell v5 from weston and its
> included clients as soon as is reasonable.
>
> It sho
I think that keeping it only promotes using it and further propagating its
use, so I'm in favor of removal.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Derek Foreman
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you all may know, xdg-shell v5 and xdg-shell stable can't currently
> co-exist in the same compositor, as both define
Hello,
As you all may know, xdg-shell v5 and xdg-shell stable can't currently
co-exist in the same compositor, as both define structures with the same
name (such as struct xdg_surface_interface).
A solid effort was made to add functionality to wayland-scanner to
resolve this, but turned out
