Rick Stockton wrote:
IIRC, The Qt/KDE design is the opposite: If they "USED" the key within
some level of code (class or interface), then they suck it in and
nothing comes back to Weston.
Not quite. There is an "accepted()" field in events, which are passed by
reference to event handlers. Th
On 09/30/2012 09:08 AM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
<< SNIP >>
I hope these comments are useful; if they're just a bunch of obvious
"baggage", I apologize.
All the normal keystorkes that a client handles are a roundtrip, so I
really can't see this being a problem. I certainly agree with
Wayland's d
Hi,
On 1 October 2012 02:08, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On 09/30/2012 01:35 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>> You might invent elaborate schemes to overcome the latter cons,
[and this did happen]
>> but even the roundtrip argument alone is a serious one, and there
>> would have to be a serious benefit in
On 09/30/2012 01:35 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:21:44 +0200
Daniel wrote:
El dt 25 de 09 de 2012 a les 11:15 -0400, en/na Kristian Høgsberg va
escriure:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:53:20PM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote:
Keystrokes should be sent to the application first. Only
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:14:15 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:07:51 +0200
> Piotr Rak wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2012/9/25 Pekka Paalanen :
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > it sounds like you make a fundamental assumption on something, that
> > > makes global shortcuts insecure, a
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:21:44 +0200
Daniel wrote:
> El dt 25 de 09 de 2012 a les 11:15 -0400, en/na Kristian Høgsberg va
> escriure:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:53:20PM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> > > Keystrokes should be sent to the application first. Only if the
> > > application refuses the
El dt 25 de 09 de 2012 a les 11:15 -0400, en/na Kristian Høgsberg va
escriure:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:53:20PM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> > Keystrokes should be sent to the application first. Only if the
> > application refuses them should they be considered global shortcuts.
>
> No.
Could
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:07:51 +0200
Piotr Rak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/9/25 Pekka Paalanen :
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > it sounds like you make a fundamental assumption on something, that
> > makes global shortcuts insecure, and so you set out to solve these
> > problems.
> >
> > What is it that you assu
2012/9/25 Timothée Ravier :
> Le 25/09/2012 01:53, Bill Spitzak a écrit :
>> Keystrokes should be sent to the application first. Only if the
>> application refuses them should they be considered global shortcuts.
>
>
> According to me, the main goal is to _never_ have global shortcuts.
> That's why
Hi,
2012/9/25 Pekka Paalanen :
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:46:37 +0200
> Piotr Rak wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Although I am not security expert, I'd like to share my input into
>> this topic, so putting on my black hat...
>>
>> It is probably not great discovery, but I believe that minimal
>> requirement
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:53:20PM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Keystrokes should be sent to the application first. Only if the
> application refuses them should they be considered global shortcuts.
No.
Kristian
> I think this will fix most of the security problems you raise. It
> also means th
Le 25/09/2012 01:53, Bill Spitzak a écrit :
> Keystrokes should be sent to the application first. Only if the
> application refuses them should they be considered global shortcuts.
According to me, the main goal is to _never_ have global shortcuts.
That's why each applications should register the
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:46:37 +0200
Piotr Rak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although I am not security expert, I'd like to share my input into
> this topic, so putting on my black hat...
>
> It is probably not great discovery, but I believe that minimal
> requirement for given combination of keys, to be allo
Keystrokes should be sent to the application first. Only if the
application refuses them should they be considered global shortcuts.
I think this will fix most of the security problems you raise. It also
means there can be simpler shortcuts, currenlty global shortcuts require
the holding down
Hi,
Although I am not security expert, I'd like to share my input into
this topic, so putting on my black hat...
It is probably not great discovery, but I believe that minimal
requirement for given combination of keys, to be allowed as global
shortcut is that is not printable and not whitespace g
15 matches
Mail list logo
