On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:05:44 -0400
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:29:01PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > Fix few typos in wl_buffer description.
> >
> > Mention backing storage in wl_buffer.destroy.
> >
> > Try to clarify the wl_buffer.release semantics by not explainin
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:29:01PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Fix few typos in wl_buffer description.
>
> Mention backing storage in wl_buffer.destroy.
>
> Try to clarify the wl_buffer.release semantics by not explaining what
> *might* happen. It is important to not suggest, that if release d
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:29:01 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Fix few typos in wl_buffer description.
>
> Mention backing storage in wl_buffer.destroy.
>
> Try to clarify the wl_buffer.release semantics by not explaining what
> *might* happen. It is important to not suggest, that if release does n
Fix few typos in wl_buffer description.
Mention backing storage in wl_buffer.destroy.
Try to clarify the wl_buffer.release semantics by not explaining what
*might* happen. It is important to not suggest, that if release does not
come before frame callback, it will not come before attaching a new
