On 03/07/2013 02:32 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
At the very least, we're going to need flags on enter/leave events to note
when the pointer left towards a subsurface.
Why exactly?
The client will receive an enter for the sub-surface as the very next
thing.
If it is about the race of an app rep
Am 07.03.2013 12:56, schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:32:21 +0100
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
Statement:
The flattened output of overlapping transparent regions depend on the
intented order of painting the graph during compositing.
Question:
Does your following annotation has a sid
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:32:21 +0100
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> Am 07.03.2013 11:44, schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
> > On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 07:25:17 +0100
> > Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> >>> The biggest improvement over v1 is that we have some thought-out
> >>> commit behaviours. It is possible to resize a
Am 07.03.2013 11:44, schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 07:25:17 +0100
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
The biggest improvement over v1 is that we have some thought-out
commit behaviours. It is possible to resize a window so that all
surfaces stay in sync on screen, and it is also possible to h
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 07:25:17 +0100
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> Hello Pekka,
>
> Am 22.02.2013 16:07, schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
> > - A totally new demo client presenting sub-surfaces, including
> >Cairo-image rendered window with a pure EGL/GL widget in a
> >sub-surface, running independentl
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:58:58 -0800
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22 February 2013 07:07, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > The biggest improvement over v1 is that we have some thought-out
> > commit behaviours. It is possible to resize a window so that all
> > surfaces stay in sync on screen, and
Hello Pekka,
Am 22.02.2013 16:07, schrieb Pekka Paalanen:
- A totally new demo client presenting sub-surfaces, including
Cairo-image rendered window with a pure EGL/GL widget in a
sub-surface, running independently, but still without glitches
on resize (sans bugs).
http://people.coll
Hi,
On 22 February 2013 07:07, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> The biggest improvement over v1 is that we have some thought-out
> commit behaviours. It is possible to resize a window so that all
> surfaces stay in sync on screen, and it is also possible to have
> sub-surfaces running on their own (i.e.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:07:44 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Open issues:
>
> - What should wl_subsurface.destroy do? Nothing, or reset the
> wl_surface's role? Currently it resets the role, since it was
> easy to implement.
>
...
> To do, bugs:
>
> - destroying the wl_surface of a wl_subsur
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:07:44 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> To do, bugs:
>
> - destroying the wl_surface of a wl_subsurface will prevent
> destroying the wl_subsurface, fix this, and adjust the
> protocol description accordingly
>
> - double-buffering of sub-surface z-order changes
>
> - a
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:05:20 +0100
Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> Hi
>
> > - a demo client with window decorations stitched from 4
> > non-overlapping sub-surfaces
>
> I tought i may write here the problems i've seen when doing window
> decorations this way in QtWayland:
> (http://qt.gitorious.org/~
Hi
> - a demo client with window decorations stitched from 4
> non-overlapping sub-surfaces
I tought i may write here the problems i've seen when doing window
decorations this way in QtWayland:
(http://qt.gitorious.org/~giucam/qt/giucam-qtwayland/commits/csd-subsurface-collage
warning: very ver
Hi all,
this is a new spin of the sub-surfaces Wayland protocol
extension, v2. The v1 was announced in:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2012-December/006844.html
Earlier we have already landed some 14 patches of toytoolkit
restructuring, that was done after v1.
The major chan
13 matches
Mail list logo
